Page 144 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Winter 2014
P. 144

Prospective studies have identified greater movement of     7.  Manusov EG. Evaluation and diagnosis of low back pain.
          the patella as a risk factor for knee pain. 27,28  Other risk   Prim Care. 2012;39:471–479.
          factors for anterior knee pain include lower quadriceps     8.  Dagenais S, Tricco AC, Haldeman S. Synthesis of recom-
          flexibility; lower vertical jump performance (lower leg   mendations for the assessment and management of low
          power); greater hip adduction; lower isometric strength   back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines. Spine J.
                                                                 2010;10:514–529.
          in hip adduction, knee extension, and knee flexion; and     9.  Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK, et al. Interventional ther-
          a smaller knee flexion angle (unloaded). 27,29  Because   apies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low
          specific weaknesses of the hip adductors, knee flexors,   back pain. Spine. 2009;34:1066–1077.
          and knee extensors appear to be injury risk factors, 27,29    10.  Orloff HA, Rapp CM. The effects of load carriage on spi-
          specific strengthening exercises for these muscle groups   nal curvature and posture. Spine. 2004;29:1325–1329.
          may reduce knee pain during load carriage. Likewise,   11.  Rodriguez-Soto AE, Jaworski J, Jensen A, et al. Effect of
          increasing quadriceps flexibility and knee extension   load carriage on lumbar spine kinematics. Spine. 2013;
          power may assist in knee pain reduction. 27            38:E783–E791.
                                                             12.  Goh, JH, Thambyah A, Bose K. Effects of varying back-
                                                                 pack loads on peak forces in the lumboscral spine during
          Additional Information                                 walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1998;13(Suppl 1):
                                                                 S26–S31.
          Additional information on foot marching, especially   13.  Gallagher S, Marras WS. Tolerance of the lumbar spine
          general guidance on care of the feet, can be found in FM   to shear: a review and recommended exposure limits. Clin
          21-19 (Foot Marches).                                  Biomech. 2012;27:973–978.
                                                             14.  Meakins JR, Smith FW, Gilbert FJ, et al. The effect of
                                                                 axial load on the sagittal plane curvature of the upright
          Summary
                                                                 human spine in vivo. J Biomech. 2008;41:2850–2854.
          In general, lighter loads (taking only what is needed   15.  Pal P, Milosavljevic S, Gregory DE, et al. The influence of
          for the mission), improving load distribution, using ap-  skill and low back pain on trunk postures and low back
          propriate physical training procedures, selecting proper   loads of shearers. Ergonomics. 2010;53:65–73.
          equipment, and choosing specific techniques directed at   16.  Holt KG, Wagenaar RC, LaFiandra ME, et al. Increased
          injury prevention will facilitate load carriage. An under-  musculoskeletal stiffness during load carriage at increas-
                                                                 ing walking speeds maintains constant vertical excursion
          standing of injury mechanisms and implementation of    of the body center of mass. J Biomech. 2003;36:465–471.
          appropriate prevention strategies will provide Special   17.  Reynolds KL, Kaszuba J, Mello RP, et al. Prolonged tread-
          Operations Forces with a higher probability of mission   mill load carriage: acute injuries and changes in foot an-
          success.                                               thropometry. Technical Report No. T1/91. Natick, MA:
                                                                 US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine;
                                                                 1990.
          Disclosures
                                                             18.  Roy TC, Lopez HP, Piva SR. Loads worn by soldiers pre-
          The author has nothing to disclose.                    dict episodes of low back pain during deployments to Af-
                                                                 ghanistan. Spine. 2013;38:1310–1317.
                                                             19.  Johnson RF, Knapik JJ, Merullo DJ. Symptoms during
          References
                                                                 load carriage: effects of mass and load distribution dur-
          1.  Knapik JJ, Reynolds K. Loads carried in military opera-  ing a 20-km road march.  Percept Mot Skills. 1995;81:
            tions: a review of historical, biomechanical and medical   331–338.
            aspects. In Friedl KE, Santee WR, eds. Military quantita-  20.  Espinosa N, Brodsky JW, Maceira E. Metatarsalgia. J Am
            tive physiology: Problems and concepts in military opera-  Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:474–485.
            tional medicine. Washington, DC: Borden Institute; 2012:   21.  Kinoshita H. Effects of different loads and carrying sys-
            303–338.                                             tems on selected biomechanical parameters describing
          2.  Dean CE. The modern warrior’s combat load. Dismounted   walking gait. Ergonomics. 1985;28:1347–1362.
            operations in Afghanistan April-May 2003. Fort Leaven-  22.  Kang JH, Chen MD, Chen SC, et al. Correlations between
            worth, KS: Army Center for Lessons Learned; 2004.    subjective treatment responses and plantar pressure pa-
          3.  Knapik J, Reynolds K, Staab J, et al. Injuries associated   rameters of metatarsal pad treatment in metatarsalgia pa-
            with strenuous road marching. Mil Med. 1992;157:64–67.  tients: a prospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.
          4.  Reynolds KL, White JS, Knapik JJ, et al. Injuries and risk   2006;7:95.
            factors in a 100-mile (161-km) infantry road march. Prev   23.  Hull JB, Hobbs C, Sidebottom S. Anterior knee pain syn-
            Med. 1999;28:167–173.                                drome. A review of current concepts and controversies. J
          5.  Knapik JJ. Prevention of foot blisters. J Spec Oper Med.   R Army Med Corps. 1999;145:89–94.
            2014;14:95–97.                                   24.  Calmbach WL, Hutchens M. Evaluation of patients pre-
          6.  Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, et al.. Diagnosis and treat-  senting with knee pain: Part II. Differential diagnosis. Am
            ment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline   Fam Physician. 2003;68:917–922.
            from the American College of Physicians and the American   25.  Harman EA, Han KI, Frykman PN, et al. The effects of
            Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:478–491.      backpack weight on the biomechanics of load carriage.



          134                                    Journal of Special Operations Medicine  Volume 14, Edition 4/Winter 2014
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149