Page 58 - JSOM Fall 2025
P. 58

advances in tightening. We believe these windlass-rod versus   to affect occlusion results: a desire to be fast promotes not
          ratcheting-buckle tightening-system differences are the reasons   using a “listening pause” to be sure of occlusion before saying
          for evidence of beneficial first-use learning regarding occlusion   “Done,” and making “Done” a non-reversible endpoint pre-
          at “Done” occurring only with the ratcheting-buckle systems.  cludes fixing a hasty utterance.

          Regarding applier experience and occlusion at “Done,” many   Conclusion
          experienced appliers used a brief “listening pause” with their
          hands off the tourniquet before saying “Done.” Because remov-  Knowledge-of-results is critical for, but does not guarantee,
          ing any hand pressure from the tourniquet can easily result in   tourniquet-application-useful first-use learning. The existence
          a pulse return if one is near the occlusion-pressure threshold,   of first-use learning can allow limited experience with one
          this is quite helpful to having Doppler-audible occlusion still   tourniquet to improve performance with a different tourniquet
          present when saying “Done.” Also, experienced appliers in this   with shared-design features. Therefore, exposure to different
          study had all been well-indoctrinated with the importance of   designs may have value, and providing tourniquet-training
          having arterial occlusion with emergency-use tourniquets, and   knowledge-of-results, whether intrinsically or via instructor
          all had prior research or teaching applications of tourniquets   feedback, is important.
          on their own limbs.
                                                             Acknowledgments
          Regarding applier experience and training scars, use of a   We thank the following Drake University undergraduates of the
          “listening pause” was part of all prior tourniquet research   Trauma Research Team for their help carrying out the exper-
          studies in which any of the experienced appliers participated.   iments: JaNiese Jensen, Alex White, Jared Defriend,  Mikayla
          This means use of a “listening pause” may not have been a   Soelter, Amanda Gregory, Bryan Williams, Mia Fidanze, Erin
          conscious decision in this study. A definite training scar was   O’Keefe, Quynh Pham, Lindsey Skerrett, Kristen Skriver, Erin
          noted in the securing process of a CAT7 application: one ex-  Steffenson, Dani Eernisse, Jack Libbesmeier, Kayla Markuson,
          perienced applier did not place the limb-encircling strap in the   Taylor Rentschler, and Stephanie Richardson.
          bracket before placing the time strap across the bracket. The
          applier knew the correct strap-securing processes, but all prior   Author Contributions
          research in which the applier had participated that involved   PW and CB contributed to concept development and project
          CATs did not include complete, double strap securing of the   design.  All authors contributed to the acquisition, analysis,
          rod in the bracket (different study objectives).   and interpretation of data and the drafting and revising of the
                                                             article. All authors had final approval of the manuscript.
          Data from others regarding the speed of tourniquet learning
          in appliers with some level of tourniquet experience support   Disclosures
          rapid learning regarding some tourniquet processes. 20–23  Our   None of the authors have any financial relationships relevant
          data indicates beneficial first-use learning can occur regard-  to this article to disclose, and there was no outside funding. As
          ing tourniquet applications. We believe this makes it highly   stated in reference 1, tourniquets were requested from manu-
          desirable to teach possible tourniquet users general applica-  facturers or distributors, and seven of the eight models of tour-
          tion principles and, ideally, provide possible tourniquet users   niquets were donated. PW and CB are paid by their respective
          hands-on experience with more than one general strap/redirect   institutions, and CHR was a volunteer researcher. None of the
          system and more than one general tightening system. Training   authors has stock in any tourniquet companies, and none do
          with each design should include intrinsic and instructor- origin   any paid consulting with any tourniquet companies. The au-
          knowledge-of-results feedback with fully- secured, arterially-   thors communicate and share data with any and all interested
          occlusive, correct applications. To maximize training benefit,   companies and individuals, and do not keep any tourniquet-
          major design aspects and critical endpoints should be specifi-  related secrets. The lab equipment belongs to Drake University
          cally noted (major design aspects: clip/no clip, hook-and-loop   and UnityPoint Health Iowa Methodist Medical Center.
          strap/self-securing redirect,   windlass-rod tightening system,
          ratcheting-dial  tightening  system,   ratcheting-buckle  tighten-  Funding
          ing system; endpoints: strap security, tightening-system secu-  No funding was received for this work. Please see the Disclo-
          rity, arterial occlusion with hands off the tourniquet).  sures section for information regarding equipment and mate-
                                                             rial support.
          Our data suggest that, with inclusion of knowledge-of- results,
          even limited training with tourniquets with different strap/   References
          redirect systems and different tightening systems would in-  1.  Wall P, Buising C, Jensen J, White A, Davis J, Renner CH. Effects
          crease the potential for application success if faced with a new   of tourniquet features on application processes. J Spec Oper Med.
          tourniquet (such as might be the case with public access bleed-  2023;23(4):11–30. doi:10.55460/8FFG-1Q48
          ing control kits or with someone else’s first aid kit).  2.  Wall P, Buising C, White A, Jensen J, Davis J, Renner CH. Effects
                                                               of tourniquet features on application processes times. J Spec Oper
                                                               Med. 2023;23(4):31–42. doi:10.55460/RPO1-CB79
          Study Limitations                                  3.  Wall P.  Brief,  General Tourniquet Training Video. Vimeo.  2020.
          The data came from a preplanned subset from a larger study.   Accessed January 24, 2022.  https://vimeo.com/447166122/aefd
          The study had the laboratory-associated limitations of no   4b257a
          actual injuries, no bleeding, low stress as compared to clini-  4.  Wall P.  Combat  Application  Tourniquet Gen 7 application.
          cal-use environments, and all tourniquet applications occur-    Vimeo. 2020.  Accessed January 21, 2022.  https://vimeo.com/
                                                               447166808/df55fa1603
          ring in quick succession, immediately after watching training   5.  Wall P.  Special Operations Forces Tactical Tourniquet-W Gen 3
          videos. Additionally, being timed and being prevented from   application.  Vimeo. 2020.  Accessed January 21, 2022.  https://
          doing any more tightening after saying “Done” are both likely   vimeo.com/447167377/1d70b203bb

          56  |  JSOM   Volume 25, Edition 3 / Fall 2025
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63