Page 110 - JSOM Fall 2025
P. 110

considerations  may  be  consistent  (e.g.,  physical,  ergonomic,   products from those assessments are more widely applicable
          nutritional demands), differences are certain to exist (e.g., op-  while remaining grounded by the Servicemember communities
          erational tempo, social dynamics).                 that these needs assessments are designed to serve.

          Psychological, spiritual, and social priorities are more likely   Acknowledgments
          than the physical/ergonomic domain to be tied to a specific   The authors would like to thank those 2W1 community mem-
          context, particularly since those three domains significantly   bers who participated at each of the three installations, their
          overlap and can be challenging to tease apart from context.   health and performance personnel, and the HAF/MAJCOM
          For that reason, it may be tempting to skip exploring the   Career-field Managers for their engagement and enthusiasm
          health and performance priorities in those domains altogether   during the CBB and for their passion for supporting the 2W1
          or to over-extrapolate from one base to the next. Either would   community. Without them, the CBB and all the efforts that
          be a mistake. Working with career-field members across instal-  have emerged from it would not have been possible. The au-
          lations has highlighted how important those three domains are   thors would also like to thank Dr. Roger Erich and Mr.  Lindsay
          to enhancing performance across the TFF wheel, mitigating   Buckalew  of  the  711th  Human  Performance Wing  for  their
          risks, and improving sustainability. Physical injuries, for exam-  support. Finally, the authors would like to thank our CBB team
          ple, have social, spiritual, and psychological components that   members current and emeritus—Dr. Travis Lunasco, Col (ret)
          must be attended to in order to ensure Servicemembers seek   Kylene Ruth, Col (ret) Colleen McBratney, Ms. Elizabeth Al-
          and connect with the care they need, experience a full recovery,   ders, Ms. Brooks Ford, Ms. Kelsey McCoskey, Dr. Gloria Park,
          and reintegrate smoothly with the capabilities required to be   and Dr. Patricia Deuster—for all their contributions to the CBB.
          mission ready. Simultaneously, strain or injury in the social,
          spiritual, or psychological domains of TFF can have cascading   Author Contributions
          implications for physical readiness as it relates to critical tasks.  RC and DC were part of the original CBB pilot and conceived
                                                             the study design. RC, DC, and RM were a part of the CBBs
          Working across 2W1 sites also highlighted how these ca-  with 2W1s referenced in this article and contributed to the
          reer-field requirements, working environments, missions, etc.   data collection, analysis, and write-up of the 2W1 CBBs, as
          can shape how career fields interface with health and per-  well as the compiled analysis and the writing and revision of
          formance personnel. The team structure that provided 2W1s   this manuscript.
          with a strong sense of community and social support, and
          was foundational for mentorship and performance, also made   Disclaimer
          some 2W1s hesitant to seek medical attention when they were   The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the
          injured because they did not want to let their team down or   authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the
          become a burden. The same pride 2W1s took in being knowl-  Uniformed Services University or the Department of Defense.
          edgeable, physically and mentally strong, and dependable made
          it challenging at times for them to take a knee when they were   The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of
          injured, especially if those injuries were invisible. These kinds   the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions
          of contextual factors add dimension to understanding how and   or policies of The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Ad-
          why 2W1s interface with health and performance personnel   vancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Mention of trade names,
          and the need to engage with these factors at each site.  commercial products, or organizations does not imply en-
                                                             dorsement by the U.S. Government.
          Conclusion
                                                             Disclosures
          Understanding the ways in which the various domains of   The  authors  have  no  financial  interests  or  relationships  to
          TFF interact with and impact each other, and how those in-  disclose.
          teractions can shape health and performance demands and
          outcomes for U.S. Servicemembers can be critical to ensuring   Funding
          that individuals and units are mission ready. CBB, as a unit-  This work was supported by the Defense Health Agency and
          based health and performance needs assessment, has shown   the United States Air Force.
          itself to be useful for identifying key barriers and facilitators
          to critical task completion. In this article, we have examined   References
          what we can say beyond the unit level about the scalability of   1.  Office of Inspector General. Evaluation of Department of Defense
          this type of rapid qualitative inquiry. Through the compari-  Military Medical Treatment Facility Challenges During the Coro-
          son of three separate blueprints conducted with 2W1 work-  navirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in Fiscal Year 2021
          ing on three separate airframes within a single career field,   (DODIG-2022-081). Department of Defense; 2022.
          we have identified health and performance factors that can be   2.  Deuster. PA, O’Connor FG, Henry KA, et al. Human perfor-
          generalized across a career field, as well as some factors that   mance optimization: an evolving charge to the Department of De-
                                                               fense.  Mil Med. 2007;172(11):1133–1137. doi:10.7205/milmed.
          remain context specific. We have also identified relationships   172.11.1133
          that  can  exist  between  generalizable  and  context-dependent   3.  Lunasco T, Chamberlin R, Deuster P. Human performance optimi-
          health and performance factors that could prove helpful for   zation: an operational and operator-centric approach. J Spec Oper
          assets tasked with providing support for Servicemembers in   Med. 2019;19(3):101–106. doi:10.55460/sn5g-cmoa
          these career fields and across TFF domains. While we have   4.  Tvaryanas A, Brown L, Miller NL. Managing the human weapon
          shown the opportunities of beginning with “thick” data and   system: a vision for an Air Force human performance doctrine. Air
                                                               & Space Power Journal. 2009:34–41.
          moving towards “big” data, future health and performance   5.  Total Force Fitness DOTmLPF-P Change Recommendation.
          needs assessments may benefit from combining approaches to   JROCM 073-182018. Joint Requirements Oversight Council,
          capture breadth and scope and to ensure the processes and   Joint Chiefs of Staff; 2018.

          108  |  JSOM   Volume 25, Edition 3 / Fall 2025
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115