Page 106 - JSOM Fall 2025
P. 106

An Ongoing Series



                                        Capability-Based Blueprinting

                          Lessons Learned in Scaling Community-Based Health and
                                        Performance Needs Assessments



                                 Rachel Chamberlin, PhD, MPH *; Rory McCarthy, PhD ;
                                                                                     2
                                                              1
                                              Daniel R. Clifton, PhD, ATC 3







          ABSTRACT
          Enhancing unit-mission effectiveness is a priority and challenge   Keywords: needs assessment; human performance
          in the U.S. military, especially in a landscape of wide-ranging   optimization; total force fitness; community-engaged
          mission capabilities and diverse career-field health and per-  research; community-based participatory research
          formance needs. The first step to addressing mission-relevant
          health and performance needs is identifying those needs within
          context. Capability-based blueprinting (CBB) is designed to   Introduction
          address mission-relevant health and performance needs by us-
          ing a “bottom up” approach, beginning with career-field and   Enhancing unit-mission effectiveness continues to be both
          unit perspectives at an installation level. Despite the value of   a priority and  a challenge in  the U.S. military, especially  in
          a capability-based blueprint to a specific installation, it is un-  the existing landscape of competing requirements, limited re-
          clear if a CBB with a career field at a specific installation pro-  sources, wide-ranging mission capabilities, and diverse career
          vides actionable insight for health and performance personnel   fields with varying health and performance needs.  Efforts
                                                                                                      1
          and career-field leadership that is transferable to members of   have had to grapple with the question of how to support
          the same career field at other installations with different mis-  evolving operational health and performance needs of career
          sion requirements. CBB was conducted in collaboration with   fields across innumerable job tasks with different missions, op-
          Weapons Armament System communities at three installations   erational requirements, risks, and working environments. Hu-
          to address this question. Findings across three capability-based   man performance optimization (HPO) and Total Force Fitness
          blueprints  articulate  the  link  between  career-field  require-  (TFF) emerged as two models to align health and performance
          ments, working environments, and career-field–specific health   service delivery with operational needs.  TFF highlights the
                                                                                            2–5
          and performance considerations. Gaining an understanding of   importance of addressing multiple areas of the human being
          career-field–critical tasks and the associated health and perfor-  (e.g., physical, psychological, spiritual, social) and the inter-
          mance priorities at one installation can provide some trans-  relational influence of each domain on the others and the indi-
          ferable knowledge for health and performance assets at other   vidual as a whole (Figure 1). HPO provides specificity, aligning
          installations, such as physical, ergonomic, and nutritional   efforts with Operator mission-critical tasks across the spec-
          demands. Continual learning is still necessary, however, since   trum from rehabilitation to performance enhancement (Fig-
          considerations, such as team dynamics and organizational cli-  ure 2). When used in concert with one another, HPO and TFF
          mate, are likely site- and time-specific and should be explored   have the potential to help identify the most impactful health
          at each site. Finally, it is important to understand that health   and performance opportunities and threats to Servicemem-
          and performance domains (e.g., physical, psychological) inter-  bers as well as devise community-engaged solutions to address
          act with and impact each other, ultimately shaping health and   the needs and wants of the operational communities being
          performance demands and, therefore, readiness.     served. 2–5
          *Correspondence to Rachel Chamberlin, Consortium for Health and Military Performance, DoD Center of Excellence, Department of Military
          and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd., Bethesda, MD, 20814
          or rachel.chamberlin.ctr@usuhs.edu
          1 Dr. Rachel Chamberlin is the Senior Anthropologist and a community-based research subject matter expert at the Consortium for Health and
          Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University,
          Bethesda, MD.  Dr. Rory McCarthy is a Qualitative Researcher and cultural anthropologist at the Consortium for Health and Military Perfor-
                     2
          mance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD.
          3 Dr. Daniel R. Clifton, is a Research Scientist and injury prevention subject matter expert at the Consortium for Health and Military Performance,
          Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD.
                                                          104
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111