Page 22 - JSOM Summer 2025
P. 22

behavior. In: Schmorrow DD, Estabrooke IV, Grootjen M, eds.   21.  Meidenbauer KL, Choe KW, Cardenas-Iniguez C, Huppert TJ,
             Foundations of  Augmented  Cognition. Neuroergonomics and     Berman  MG.  Load-dependent relationships between frontal
             Operational Neuroscience. 5638. Springer; 2009:810-817. doi:   fNIRS activity and performance: A data-driven PLS approach.
             10.1007/978-3-642-02812-0_91                       Neuro-Image. 2021;230:117795. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.
           3.  O’Donovan MP, Hancock CL, Bode VG, Hasselquist L. A compar-  117795
             ison of Expert and Novice marksmanship performance and pos-  22.  Zohdi H, Amez-Droz V, Scholkmann F, Wolf U. differences be-
             tural mechanics using inertial measurement units (IMUs) during   tween good, moderate and poor performers of a verbal fluency
             dynamic live-fire shooting. Appl Ergon. 2024;114:104131. doi:   task under blue light exposure: An SPA-fNIRS study. Adv Exp Med
             10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104131                       Biol. 2023;1438:69–74. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42003-0_12
           4.  Anderson GS, Di Nota PM, Metz GAS, Andersen JP. The impact   23.  Zohdi H, Scholkmann F, Wolf U. Changes in cerebral oxygenation
             of acute stress physiology on skilled motor performance: impli-  and systemic physiology during a verbal fluency task: differences
             cations for policing. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2501. doi:10.3389/  between men and Women. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1395:17–22.
             fpsyg.2019.02501                                   doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14190-4_3
           5.  Andersen JP, Di Nota PM, Beston B, et al. Reducing lethal force   24.  Bunce SC, Izzetoglu K, Ayaz H, et al. Implementation of fNIRS
             errors by modulating police physiology. J Occup Environ Med.   for monitoring levels of expertise and mental workload. In:
             2018;60(10):867. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001401  Schmorrow DD, Fidopiastis CM, eds. Foundations of Augmented
           6.  Nibbeling N, Oudejans RRD, Ubink EM, Daanen HAM.  The   Cognition. Directing the Future of Adaptive Systems. Springer;
             effects of anxiety and exercise-induced fatigue on shooting accu-  2011:13–22. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21852-1_2
             racy and cognitive performance in infantry soldiers. Ergonomics.   25.  Friedman NP, Robbins TW. The role of prefrontal cortex in cog-
             2014;57(9):1366–1379. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.924572  nitive control and executive function.  Neuropsychopharmacol-
           7.  Choi HH, van Merriënboer JJG, Paas F. Effects of the physical   ogy. 2022;47(1):72–89. doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0
             environment on cognitive load and learning: towards a new   26.  Diamond A. Executive functions.  Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:
             model of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review. 2014;   135–168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
             26(2):225–244. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6    27.  Goris T, Brawner K.  Examining the influence of heartbeat on
           8.  Proctor S, Heaton K, Lieberman H, et al. Military cognitive per-  expert marksman performance [technical report] ARL-TN-0754.
             formance and readiness assessment initiative: Final Report. De-  Aberdeen  Proving  Ground  (MD):  US  Army  Research  Labora-
             fense Technical Information Center; 2017. Accessed August 28,   tory;  April 2016.  Accessed September 3, 2024.  https://search
             2024. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/trecms/AD1053085  lib.cwu.edu/permalink/01ALLIANCE_CWU/1jketq5/alma
           9.  Johnson RR, Stone BT, Miranda CM, et al. Identifying psycho-  99783744001866
             physiological indices of expert vs. novice performance in deadly   28.  McDuff D, Gontarek S, Picard R. Remote measurement of cog-
             force judgment and decision making. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;   nitive stress via heart rate variability. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng
             8:512. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00512                Med  Biol  Soc  IEEE  Eng  Med  Biol  Soc Annu  Int  Conf.  2014;
          10.  Biggs AT, Hamilton JA, Thompson AG, et al. Not according to   2014:2957–2960. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944243
             plan: cognitive failures in marksmanship due to effects of exper-  29.  Tremayne P, Barry RJ.  Elite pistol shooters: physiological pat-
             tise, unknown environments, and the likelihood of shooting un-  terning of best vs. worst shots.  Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int
             intended targets. Appl Ergon. 2023;112:104058. doi:10.1016/j.  Organ Psychophysiol. 2001;41(1):19–29. doi:10.1016/s0167-
             apergo.2023.104058                                 8760(00)00175-6
          11.  Biggs A, Huffman G, Hamilton J, et al. Small arms combat mod-  30.  Gong A, Liu J, Jiang C, Fu Y. Rifle shooting performance cor-
             eling: a superior way to evaluate marksmanship data. J Def Anal   relates with electroencephalogram beta rhythm network activity
             Logist. 2023;7(1):69–87. doi:10.1108/JDAL-11-2022-0012  during aiming.  Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018;2018:e4097561.
          12.  Morrison GB,  Vila BJ.  Police handgun qualification: practical   doi:10.1155/2018/4097561
             measure  or aimless  activity?  Polic Int  J Police  Strateg Manag.   31.  Department of the Army.  Training and qualification – individ-
             1998;21(3):510–533. doi:10.1108/13639519810228804  ual weapons (TC 3-20.40). Published online 2019. Accessed May
          13.  Cooper D, Fuller J, Wiggins MW, Wills JA, Main LC, Doyle T.   7, 2024.  https://rdl.train.army.mil/catalog-ws/view/100.ATSC%
             Negative consequences of pressure on marksmanship may be   2FD6C17734-DD08-40FD-A50B-09448575646F-
             offset by early training exposure to contextually relevant threat   1564595433375/tc3_20x40wc1.pdf
             training: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Hum Factors.   32.  Scholkmann F, Wolf M. General equation for the differential path-
             2024;66(1):294–311. doi:10.1177/0018720821106590   length factor of the frontal human head depending on wavelength
          14.  Brown S, Villa J, Hancock C, Hasselquist L. Stance and transition   and age. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(10):105004. doi:10.1117/1.JBO.
             movement effects on marksmanship performance of expert shoot-  18.10.105004
             ers during a simulated multiple target engagement task. Proceedings   33.  Cohen J.  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
             of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.   2nd ed. Academic Press; 1988.
             2018;62(1):1444-1448. doi:10.1177/1541931218621328  34.  Causse M, Chua Z, Peysakhovich V, Del Campo N, Matton N.
          15.  Rao HM, Smalt CJ, Rodriguez  A, et al. Predicting cognitive   Mental workload and neural efficiency quantified in the prefron-
             load and operational performance in a simulated marksmanship   tal cortex  using fNIRS.  Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5222. doi:10.1038/
             task.  Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:222. doi:10.3389/fnhum.   s41598-017-05378-x
             2020.00222                                      35.  Stuss DT, Shallice T, Alexander MP, Picton TW. A multidisciplinary
          16.  Chung GKWK, O’Neil HF, Delacruz GC, Bewley WL. The Role   approach to anterior attentional functions.  Ann  N Y Acad  Sci.
             of anxiety on novices’ rifle marksmanship performance. Educ As-  1995;769:191–211. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38140.x
             sess. 2005;10(3):257–275. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1003_6  36.  Ortiz KR, Hunter JG, Thorpe AJ, et al. Assessing the Relation-
          17.  Smith CD, Cooper AD, Merullo DJ, et al. Sleep restriction and   ship Between Learning Stages and Prefrontal Cortex Activation
             cognitive load affect performance on a simulated marksmanship   in a Psychomotor Task. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet.
             task. J Sleep Res. 2019;28(3):e12637. doi:10.1111/jsr.12637  Published online August 28, 2024:10711813241260675. doi:10.
          18.  Bonilauri A, Sangiuliano Intra F, Baselli G, Baglio F. Assessment   1177/10711813241260675
             of fNIRS signal processing pipelines: towards clinical applica-  37.  Keles HO, Cengiz C, Demiral I, Ozmen MM, Omurtag A. High
             tions. Appl Sci. 2021;12(1):316. doi:10.3390/app12010316  density optical neuroimaging predicts surgeons’s subjective ex-
          19.  Herold F, Wiegel P, Scholkmann F, Müller NG. Applications of   perience and skill levels. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0247117. doi:
             functional  near-infrared  spectroscopy  (fNIRS)  neuroimaging  in   10.1371/journal.pone.0247117
             exercise–cognition science: a systematic, methodology-focused   38.  Nemani A, Yücel MA, Kruger U, et al. Assessing bimanual motor
             review. J Clin Med. 2018;7(12):466. doi:10.3390/jcm7120466  skills with optical neuroimaging. Sci Adv. 2018;4(10):eaat3807.
          20.  Perrey S. Evaluating brain functioning with NIRS in sports: Cere-  doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat3807
             bral oxygenation and cortical activation are two sides of the same   39.  Leff DR, Orihuela-Espina F, Atallah L, Darzi A, Yang GZ. Func-
             coin.  Front  Neuroergonomics.  2022;3:1022924. doi:10.3389/  tional near infrared spectroscopy in novice and expert surgeons—a
             fnrgo.2022.1022924                                 manifold embedding approach. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist

          20  |  JSOM   Volume 25, Edition 2 / Summer 2025
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27