Page 92 - JSOM Spring 2025
P. 92

ii
          SOF medic’s practical skills as the most important aspect of   achieve the mission  Character refinement enables real-time
          change agency by which performance possibilities are trans-  change agency across the individual medic, team, and orga-
          formed in real time. Pragmatic power to change the perfor-  nization to orient toward the political hospitality needed to
          mance space amid SOF missions lies with those who utilize   perform SOF missions.
          everyday  pressures  to  embrace,  absorb,  and  direct  force  of
          movement, creating fluid family formations that support un-  Our use of the term center of gravity (COG) describes how
          conventional resilience.                           relationship systems influence the individual medic’s, team’s,
                                                             and organization’s ability to engage the whole weight of per-
          Family Formations: Merging Family Systems          formance pressure at the point where “the downward force
                                                                                                          7(p20)
          with the Pragmatic Purpose of Tactical Formations  of gravity appears to act on” the SOF mission as a whole.
                                                             Optimal engagement with COG influences the force of move-
          Social  determinants  are  connections  that  positively  and/or   ment during the character refinement process toward dynamic
          negatively facilitate the medic, team, and organization’s abil-  equilibrium, refining the family formation toward higher actu-
          ity to bear the weight of dynamic freedom of maneuver amid   alization and performance. 1
          the ambiguity of SOF missions. In military vernacular, family
          is  expressed  in a  multitude  of ways.  Different  family struc-  Qualitative Exemplars
          tures emerged in our data set as a strong influence on uncon-  We present two contrasting examples of family formations that
          ventional resilience, leading us to construct the term  family   optimize and degrade unconventional resilience. Optimal fam-
          formation by integrating family systems theory with tactical   ily formations compose and coordinate momentum such that
          formations during the character refinement process.  individual medic, team, and organizational freedom of maneu-
                                                             ver acts fluidly when integrating new relationships across the
          Family  systems  theory  suggests  relationship  groups  develop   military, medical, and civilian communities. Degraded family
          cultures that tightly pattern performances of individual mem-  formations compose and coordinate momentum such that in-
          bers, the nuclear group, and the entire relationship system   dividual medic, team, and organizational freedom of maneu-
          in both in-group and out-group performance spaces.  Con-  ver is restricted when encountering new relationships.
                                                     5
          sequently, the unique arrangement of relationship systems
          strongly  shapes  how  individual,  group,  and  organizational   Optimization of Unconventional Resilience
          character is developed and expressed. Our analysis of family   The first family formation we discuss is an ensemble formation
          in this data set illustrates how these arrangements influence   with irregular gifts and talents gained from relationships in the
          the medic’s, team’s, and organization’s engagement.  civilian, medical, and military communities. The COG trans-
                                                             lates social connections into focused action amid the character
          Tactical formations compose and coordinate collective force   refinement process.
          of movement through battlefield maneuvers. They vary in size
          and capability according to the assigned task and purpose of   Everyone has a unique perspective that is structured by
          the military mission. The functional goal of tactical maneuvers   family, medical, and military experiences. It’s really fun
          is to efficiently, effectively, and expediently direct force on tar-  to see what kind of magic can be created in SOST when
          get while maintaining equilibrium of the tactical formation. 6  we appreciate the idiosyncrasies that everyone’s diverse
                                                               background brings to the team and organization. You
          Qualitative analysis of ethnographic data led us to define   never  know  how  valuable  someone’s  particular  experi-
          family formations as unique relationship arrangements found   ences are until a team gets to a deployed location. When
          within the social context  of military, medical, and civilian   we appreciate all the interests, hobbies, and skills each
          communities that compose and coordinate momentum toward   SOST teammate brings, the team finds quirky ways to
          character refinement. Resilient performance is continuous and   combine our different backgrounds to achieve mission
          adaptive when character refinement is optimized in a family   objectives in deployment. You never know how important
          formation, engages in: 1) observation of value hierarchies in   one person’s obscure skill might be or when someone’s
          different performance spaces across the deployment-cycle; 2)   different viewpoint will come in handy. During one de-
          examination of priorities against SOF truths;  3) discernment   ployment people were getting tense. One teammate was
                                             i
          between what change is necessary and/or possible; and 4) will-  passionate about yoga for relaxation. We tried it and it
          ingness to press for change when priorities need shifting to   made a huge difference with the edginess. Another time,
          i.  For our possible readers who are unfamiliarized with the Special Operations Truth, they are as follows: 1. Humans are more important than
            hardware. People—not equipment—make the critical difference. The right people, highly trained and working as a team, will accomplish the
            mission with the equipment available. On the other hand, the best equipment in the world cannot compensate for a lack of the right people.
            2 Quality is better than quantity. A small number of people, carefully selected, well trained, and well led, are preferable to larger numbers of
            troops, some of whom may not be up to the task. 3. Special Operations Forces cannot be mass produced. It takes years to train operational
            units to the level of proficiency needed to accomplish difficult and specialized SOF missions. Intense training—both in SOF schools and
            units—is required to integrate competent individuals into fully capable units. This process cannot be hastened without degrading ultimate
            capability. 4. Competent Special Operations Forces cannot be created after emergencies occur. Creation of competent, fully mission-capable
            units takes time. Employment of fully capable special operations capability on short notice requires highly trained and constantly available
            SOF units in peacetime. Most special operations require non-SOF support. The operational effectiveness of our deployed forces cannot be,
            and never has been, achieved without being enabled by our joint service partners. The support Air Force, Army, Marine and Navy engineers,
            technicians, intelligence analysts, and the numerous other professions that contribute to SOF, have substantially increased our capabilities and
            effectiveness throughout the world.
          ii.  1. Understand the operational environment; 2. Recognize political implications; 3. Facilitate interagency activities; 4. Engage the threat dis-
            criminately; 5. Consider long-term effects; 6. Ensure legitimacy and credibility of Special Operations; 7. Anticipate and control psychological
            effects; 8. Apply capabilities indirectly; 9. Develop multiple options; 10. Ensure long-term sustainment; 11. Provide sufficient intelligence; 12.
            Balance security and synchronization.

          90  |  JSOM   Volume 25, Edition 1 / Spring 2025
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97