Page 80 - JSOM Fall 2024
P. 80

Lest We Forget                                      2.  DeBakey ME, Simeone FA. Battle injuries of the arteries in World
                                                                War II; an analysis of 2,471 cases. Ann Surg. 1946;123(4):534–579.
          The Korean War, among the many challenges faced by mili-  3.  Hughes CW. Use of an intra-aortic balloon catheter tamponade
          tary medicine, provided incredible advancements in the care   for controlling intra-abdominal hemorrhage in man.  Surgery.
          of the wounded. Retaining the knowledge gained from these   1954;36(1):65–68.
          advances and the lessons learned is invaluable. As we shift our   4.  Hughes CW. Arterial repair during the Korean war. Ann Surg.
          focus to LSCOs, we need to look not just to the future for   1958;147(4):555–561.
          innovative strategies, but also to the past, to the advancements   5.  Sidhu RS, Park J, Brydges R, MacRae HM, Dubrowski A. Lab-
                                                                oratory-based vascular anastomosis training: a randomized con-
          made by our predecessors who dared to innovate and applied   trolled trial evaluating the effects of bench model fidelity and level
          their lessons learned. Our future success will depend on apply-  of training on skill acquisition. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(2):343–349.
          ing the lessons learned in blood by those who bore the torch   doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.040
          before us, so the sacrifices of those wounded or killed in the   6.  Turner CA, Stockinger ZT, Gurney JM. Vascular surgery during
          larger wars of the 20th century are not in vain. Lest we forget.  U.S. combat operations from 2002 to 2016: Analysis of vascu-
                                                                lar procedures performed to inform military training. J Trauma
                                                                Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(1S Suppl 2):S145–S153. doi:10.1097/
          Author Contributions                                  TA.0000000000001849
          WY and JA conceived of the manuscript, wrote, and conducted   7.  Vertrees A, Fox CJ, Quan RW, et al. The use of prosthetic grafts
          research. JJ and SK are subject matter experts who provided   in complex military vascular trauma: a limb salvage strategy for
          guidance and reviewed the accuracy of the writing. All authors   patients with severely limited autologous conduit.  J Trauma.
          read and approved the final manuscript.               2009;66(4): 980–983.
                                                              8.  O’Hara PJ, Hertzer NR, Mascha EJ, Krajewski LP, Clair DG, Ou-
                                                                riel K. A prospective, randomized study of saphenous vein patch-
          Disclosures                                           ing versus synthetic  patching during  carotid endarterectomy.  J
          The authors have nothing to disclose.                 Vasc Surg. 2002;35(2):324–332. doi:10.1067/mva.2002.120047
                                                              9.  Stonko DP, Betzold RD, Abdou H, et al. In-hospital outcomes in
          Disclaimer                                            autogenous vein versus synthetic graft interposition for traumatic
          The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do   arterial injury: A propensity-matched cohort from PROOVIT. J
          not reflect the official policy or position of the Brody School   Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;92(2):407–412. doi:10.1097/TA.
                                                                0000000000003465
          of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, the Scott   10.  Steinberg JB, Nickell SA, Jacocks MA, Stelzer P. Replacement of
          Department of Urology, the Uniformed Services University,   the abdominal aorta with an aortic homograft in a patient with
          the U.S. Army Medical Department, the U.S. Army Office of   an aortic dissection.  Ann Vasc  Surg. 1991;5(6):538–541. doi:
          the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army, the Depart-  10.1007/BF02015279
          ment of the Navy, or the Department of Defense, or the U.S.   11.  Bisdas T, Bredt M, Pichlmaier M, et al. Eight-year experience with
          Government.                                           cryopreserved arterial homografts for the in situ reconstruction
                                                                of abdominal aortic infections. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(2):323–330.
                                                                doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.27714
          Funding                                            12.  Snyder SO,  Wheeler JR, Gregory RT, Gayle RG, Zirkle PK.
          No funding was received for this work.                Freshly harvested cadaveric venous homografts as arterial con-
                                                                duits in infected fields. Surgery. 1987;101(3):283–291.
          References                                         13.  Hughes CW, Cohen A. The repair of injured blood vessels. Surg
          1.  Ottaway JC, Yeo CJ, Phillips BR. Major General Carl W. Hughes,   Clin North Am. 1958;38(6):1529–1543.
            MD–soldier, surgeon, innovator.  Am Surg. 2023;89(11):5047–
            5048. doi:10.1177/00031348221142576              PMID: 39243402; DOI: 10.55460/QIKQ-DYF9



































          78  |  JSOM   Volume 24, Edition 3 / Fall 2024
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85