Page 34 - JSOM Summer 2023
P. 34

suggesting that the model should not be used in high-heat en-  5.  Schauer SG, Naylor JF, Maddry JK, et al. Prehospital airway man-
          vironments in which direct sunlight exposure is prevalent. The   agement in Iraq and Afghanistan: a descriptive analysis. South Med
                                                                J. 2018;111(12):707–713.
          models that scored lower in comparison with the rest of the   6.  Blackburn MB, April MD, Brown DJ, et al. Prehospital airway pro-
          models (i.e., King LTS-D, LMA Supreme, air-Q, Baska Mask)   cedures performed in trauma patients by ground forces in Afghani-
          may not be optimal for military field use. However, all SGA   stan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(1S Suppl 2): S154–S160.
          models must be taken in context with clinical performance of   7.  Schauer SG, Naylor JF, Chow AL, et al. Survival of casualties un-
          the devices, packaging, and cost.                     dergoing prehospital supraglottic airway placement versus crico-
                                                                thyrotomy. J Spec Oper Med. 2019;19(3):86–89.
                                                              8.  Schauer SG, April MD, Fairley R, et al. A comparison of the iGel
          Funding                                               versus cricothyrotomy by combat medics using a synthetic cadaver
          Our study was supported by a grant from the Defense Health   model:  a  randomized,  controlled  pilot  study.  J  Spec  Oper  Med.
                                                                2020;20(4):68–72.
          Program 6.7.                                        9.  Butler FK Jr, Blackbourne LH, Gross K. The combat medic aid
                                                                bag: 2025. CoTCCC top 10 Recommended battlefield trauma care
          Acknowledgments                                       research, development, and evaluation priorities for 2015. J Spec
                                                                Oper Med. 2015;15(4):7–19.
          This research was supported in part by the Oak Ridge Institute   10.  Schauer SG, JRD Fernandez, JL Roper, et al. A randomized cross-
          for Science and Education through an interagency agreement   over study comparing surgical cricothyrotomy techniques by com-
          between the US Department of Energy and US Army Institute   bat medics using a synthetic cadaver model.  Am J Emerg Med.
          of Surgical Research. The low-pressure (altitude) test was com-  2018;36(4):651–656.
          pleted with assistance from the Hypersonics Laboratory at the   11.  Command  USATaE.  Environmental  Engineering Considerations
                                                                and Laboratory Tests. In. H ed: Department of Defense; 2019.
          University of Texas at San Antonio.                12.  Berard D, Navarro JD, Bascos G, et al. Novel expandable archi-
                                                                tected breathing tube for improving airway securement in emer-
          Disclaimer                                            gency care. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;114:104211.
          The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and   13.  IngMar Medical. QuickLung RespiTrainer Advance Manual Ven-
                                                                tilation Task Trainer.  https://www.ingmarmed.com/wp-content
          do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Army   /uploads/2014/09/RespiTrainer-Advance-Operations-Manual
          Medical Department, Department of the Army, Department of   -05-21-14.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed 4 January 2021.
          Defense, or the US Government.                     14.  Banoo H, Nusrat N. Implications of low stomach acid: an update.
                                                                Rama Univ J Med Sci. 2016;2(2):16–26.
                                                             15.  Kim M-S, Oh J-T, Min JY, Lee K-H, Lee J-R. A randomised com-
          Disclosures                                           parison of the i-gel and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic in in-
          None.                                                 fants. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(4):362–367.
                                                             16.  Lopez AM, Agusti M, Gambus P, Pons M, Anglada T, Valero R. A
          Author Contributions                                  randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA
          Carlos Bedolla, BS, and Danielius Zilevicius, BS, contributed   supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery.
                                                                J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(6):1255–1262.
          equally to this study. CB, DZ, GC, MG, SS, and RLH designed   17.  Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Gabbott DA, Haslam GM, Muchatuta
          and conducted the experiments. CB and DZ wrote the initial   N, Cook TM. I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients.
          draft of the paper. MDA, BL, JFN, RAD, SGS, and RLH pro-  Anaesthesia. 2008;63(9):991–995.
          vided expert knowledge and substantial edits to the paper.   18.  Gatward JJ, Cook TM, Seller C, et al. Evaluation of  the size 4
                                                                i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia.
          RAD, SGS, and RLH conceived the study concept and super-  2008;63(10):1124–1130.
          vised the overall research plan. All authors read and approved   19.  Sabuncu U, Kusderci HS, Oterkus M, et al. AuraGain and i-Gel
          the final draft.                                      laryngeal masks in general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystec-
                                                                tomy: performance characteristics and effects on hemodynamics.
                                                                Saudi Med J. 2018;39(11):1082–1089.
          References                                         20.  Durrani HD, Butt KJ, Sadaf S, Rehan A, Khan AM, Umar A. Com-
          1.  Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battlefield   parison of LMA Classic and i-gel in anesthetized, spontaneously
            (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J   breathing patients during elective surgical procedures. Anaesth Pain
            Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–437.  Intensive Care. 2013;17(3):274–278.
          2.  Mazuchowski EL, Kotwal RS, Janak JC, et al. Mortality review of   21.  Bielski A, Smereka J, Madziala M, Golik D, Szarpak L. Compari-
            US Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities. J Trauma   son of blind intubation with different supraglottic airway devices
            Acute Care Surg. 2020;88(5):686–695.                by inexperienced physicians in several airway scenarios: a manikin
          3.  Kotwal RS, Mazuchowski EL, Janak JC, et al. United States military   study. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178(6):871–882.
            fatalities during Operation New Dawn. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.   22.  Gupta B, Gupta S, Hijam B, Shende P, Rewari V. Comparison of
            2021;91(2):375–383.                                 three  supraglottic  airway  devices  for  airway  rescue  in  the  prone
          4.  Adams BD, Cuniowski PA, Muck A, De Lorenzo RA. Registry of   position: a manikin-based study. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2015;8
            emergency airways arriving at combat hospitals. J Trauma. 2008;   (4):188–192.
            64(6):1548–1554.
                                                             PMID: 37083896; DOI: 10.55460/B4KU-GB0V




















          32  |  JSOM   Volume 23, Edition 2 / Summer 2023
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39