Page 138 - JSOM Fall 2022
P. 138

rather than the same Servicemembers over time. In our study,   performance and preserving complete mental health in combat
          being mid­career was our proxy for continued stressor expo­  Servicemembers.
          sure rather  than a direct  measurement. Directly  measuring
          combat stress exposure is beyond the scope of this project, but   Disclosures
          the current study is foundational for this as a critical next step.   The authors have nothing to disclose.
          Additionally, more granular military environment information,
          such as organizational structures, should be considered in fu­  References
          ture studies as well as deployment factors, such as combat and   1.  Hoge  CW,  Castro  CA,  Messer  SC,  et  al.  Combat  duty  in  Iraq
          blast exposure. 37,38                                 and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. N
                                                                Engl J Med. 2004;351:13–22.
                                                              2.  Fischer H.  U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New
          The prevailing COVID­19 pandemic limited access to study   Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Free-
          participants rendering a small sample size for our study, es­  dom. Washington, DC; 2013. Accession Number: ADA590694
          pecially for SOF mid­career Servicemembers (n = 20). Small   3.  Hoge CW, Auchterlonie JL, Milliken CS.  Mental health prob­
          sample sizes can increase the possibility of Type II error in   lems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military
          findings. Due to detecting significant associations, we believe   service after returning from deployment to iraq or afghanistan.
                                                                J Am Med Assoc. 2006;295(9):1023–1032
          Type II error to be unlikely. Per our a priori alpha value (.05),   4.  Meadows SO, Engel CC, Collins RL, et al. 2015 Department of
          five degrees of freedom, and a noncentrality parameter cal­  Defense Health Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS). Vol 8.; 2018.
                                                  2
          culated via sensitivity analysis (12.83), a critical χ  value of   5.  Belding JN, Casta SF, Jacobson IG, et al. The Millennium Cohort
                                                39
          11.07 was needed to achieve a power of 80%.  The criti­  Study: the first 20 years of research dedicated to understanding
              2
          cal χ  value was achieved for each overall models indicating   the  long­term  health  of  us  service  members  and  veterans.  Ann
          that we were sufficiently powered. Beyond these previously   Epidemiol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.12.002
          addressed statistical limitations, small samples can be very   6.  Jacobson IG, Adler AB, Roenfeldt KA, et al. Combat experience,
                                                    40
          useful in underrepresented populations, such as SOF.  With   new­onset mental health conditions, and posttraumatic growth in
                                                                U.S. service members. Psychiatry. 2021;84(3):276–290. doi:10.1
          this, we have considered the present study’s generalizability   080/00332747.2021.1929770
          to other military/tactical populations or among SOF combat   7.  Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters
          Servicemembers. Importantly, the present study was not meant   EE. Lifetime prevalence and age­of­onset distributions. Arch Gen
          to generalize broadly, but, due to the significant findings, it   Psychiatry. 2005;62:593–602. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593
          should generalize locally to other SOF combat Servicemem­  8.  Vyas KJ, Fesperman SF, Nebeker BJ, et al. Preventing PTSD
          bers. A consideration that can compensate for small sample   and  depression  and  reducing  health  care  costs  in  the  military:
                                                                a call for building resilience among service members. Mil Med.
          size research is measurement reliability.  Acceptable internal   2016;181:1240. doi:10.7205/MILMED­D­15­00585
                                         41
          consistency values, which are an indication of psychometric   9.  Barczak-Scarboro NE, Cole WR, DeLellis SM, et al. Mental
          reliability, were found in the present study.  Additionally, we   health  symptoms  are  associated  with  mild  traumatic  brain  in­
                                           20
          visualized our data and used descriptive statistics to focus on   jury history in active Special Operations Forces (SOF) combat
          the raw data collected in addition to hypothesis testing, as sug­  and combat support Soldiers. Mil Med. 2020;185(11–12):e1946–
                                                                e1953. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaa167
                              41
          gested with small samples.  Based on these considerations, we   10.  Keyes CLM. Mental health as a complete state: how the salutogenic
          are confident that the present study results merit consideration   perspective completes the picture. In: Bauer GF, Hämmig O, eds.
          to inform future specialized military research.       Bridging Occupational, Organization and Public Health: A Trans-
                                                                disciplinary Approach. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Busi­
          Considering clinical mental health diagnoses increased in vet­  ness Media; 2014:179–192. doi:10.1007/978­94­007­5640­3_11
          erans following the start of the Iraq War, the present study is   11.  Keyes CLM. The mental health continuum: from languishing
          limited in that it did not also measure SOF combat Service­  to flourishing in life.  J Heal Soc Behav. 2002;43(2):207–222.
                                                                https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197
          members nearing the end of their career.  Various studies have   12.  Campbell DJ, Nobel OB-YY. Occupational stressors in military
                                         37
          reported poor mental health in retired Servicemember popu­  service: a review and framework. Mil Psychol. 2009;21:47–67.
          lations. 42,43  The present study only investigated positive and   doi:10.1080/08995600903249149
          negative mental health symptom differences between combat   13.  Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Transactional Theory and Research on
          Servicemembers either directly entering their SOF organization   Emotions and Coping. Vol 1.; 1987. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.
          (SOF career start) or years into SOF service (SOF mid­ career).   com/doi/pdf/10.1002/per.2410010304.
          Evidence from this study enhances knowledge regarding men­  14.  Jaffee MS, Helmick KM, Girard PD, Meyer KS, Dinegar K,
                                                                George K. Acute clinical care and care coordination for traumatic
          tal health in early to mid­career specialized combat Service­  brain injury within Department of Defense. J Rehabil Res Dev.
          members, yet the implications do not span a full SOF career.   2009;46(6):655. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2008.09.0114
          Further, the present study focused heavily on military and in­  15.  Stein MB, Kessler RC, Heeringa SG, et al. Prospective longitu­
          jury stressors directly related to SOF service. Other stressors   dinal evaluation of the effect of deployment­acquired traumatic
          (e.g., relationships with friends or partners, owning a home,   brain injury on posttraumatic stress and related disorders: results
          children) should be considered to produce a more holistic pic­  from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Service­
                                                                members (Army STARRS).  Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:1101–
          ture of operational readiness.                        1111. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14121572
                                                             16.  Block J, Kremen AM. IQ and ego­resiliency: conceptual and em­
          The present study took a necessary step to better describe   pirical connections and separateness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;
          mental health symptoms at different SOF career stages,   70(2):349–361. doi:10.1037/0022­3514.70.2.349
          and the role resilience  plays in SOF Servicemember  mental   17.  Petros N, Opacka-Juffry J, Huber JH. Psychometric and neu­
          health. The health and safety of combat Servicemembers as   robiological assessment of resilience in a non­clinical sample of
          well as the effectiveness of combat initiatives have domestic   adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(10):2099–2108. doi:
                                                                10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.03.022
          and global ramifications. This research is of particular im­  18.  Losoi H, Silverberg ND, Wä ljas M, et al. Resilience is associated
          portance as it informs the future development of evaluation   with outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma.
          tools that support prophylactic approaches to sustaining   2015;32(13):942–949. doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3799


          134  |  JSOM   Volume 22, Edition 3 / Fall 2022
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143