Page 134 - 2022 Spring JSOM
P. 134

FIGURE 2  Tactical medics evaluating a standardized patient.   FIGURE 3  Evaluator remotely observing a standardized patient
                                                             encounter.











         (Photo courtesy of author NT.)                                                                       (Photo courtesy of author NT.)











          appreciated  the  ability to  intently  observe provider  perfor-
          mance in a highly controlled and consistent setting without the   4.  Johns Hopkins Medicine Simulation Center. Standardized Patient
          need to also monitor the actions and responses of role players.  Program.  https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/simulation_center/
                                                                training/standardized_patient_program. Accessed January 09, 2022.
                                                              5.  University of Pennsylvania Standardized Patient Program. What is
          Discussion                                            a Standardized Patient?  https://www.med.upenn.edu/spprogram
                                                                /what-is-a-standardized-patient.html. Accessed January 09, 2022.
          The development of enhanced patient assessment skills   6.  Oregon Health & Science University. Simulation at OHSU.
          amongst TEMS providers is a complex endeavor requiring   https://www.ohsu.edu/simulation/standardized-patient-program.
          leadership support, management commitment, and proactive   Accessed January 09, 2022.
          medical oversight. Tactical medical education will always rely,   7.  Felix HM, Simon LV. Types of Standardized Patients and Recruit-
                                                                ment in Medical Simulation. [Updated 2021 Oct 1]. In: StatPearls
          to varying degrees, upon traditional approaches such as di-  [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-.
          dactic teaching, procedural skills training, and scenario-based   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549907. Accessed Jan-
          practical exercises. For the lattermost, use of the relatively un-  uary 19, 2022.
          differentiated role player has seemingly maintained utility to   8.  Lewis KL, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, Hölzer H, Lyman L, Smith
          prepare for high-threat scenarios resulting in life-threatening   C, Thompson TM, Wallace A, Gliva-McConvey G. The Associa-
          traumatic injuries.                                   tion of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best
                                                                Practice (SOBP). Adv Simul (London). 2017 Jun 27;2:10. PMID:
          As greater understanding emerges for the full breadth of tac-  29450011.
          tical medicine encounters, so should the appreciation for the   9.  Alsaad AA, Davuluri S, Bhide VY, Lannen AM, Maniaci MJ. As-
          prevalence of those lower acuity clinical encounters with the   sessing the performance and satisfaction of medical residents uti-
          potential to negatively impact operational team wellness and   lizing standardized patient versus mannequin-simulated training.
                                                                Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Jul 18;8:481–486. PMID: 28765717.
          performance. Novel approaches to TEMS education such as   10.  Jaberi A, Momennasab M. Effectiveness of standardized patient
          the use of standardized patients for “sick call” training may   in abdominal physical examination education: A randomized,
          offer distinct advantages albeit at unspecified increased costs.   controlled trial. Clin Med Res. 2019 Jun;17(1–2):1–10. PMID:
          At present, it appears the availability of standardized patient   31160473.
          training is primarily through medical education programs at   11.  Downar J, McNaughton N, Abdelhalim T, Wong N, Lapointe-
          academic medical institutions. Further efforts are needed to   Shaw L, Seccareccia D, Miller K, Dev S, Ridley J, Lee C, Rich-
                                                                ardson L, McDonald-Blumer H, Knickle K. Standardized patient
          better  establish  the educational  value  and cost effectiveness   simulation versus didactic teaching alone for improving residents’
          of using standardized patients to augment tactical medical   communication skills when discussing goals of care and resusci-
          education.                                            tation: A randomized controlled trial. Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;31
                                                                (2):130–139. PMID: 27307057.
                                                             12.  Herbstreit F, Merse S, Schnell R, Noack M, Dirkmann D, Besuch
          References
          1.  American College of Emergency Physicians. Policy Statement:   A, Peters J. Impact of standardized patients on the training of
            High-Threat Event Casualty Care (April 2021).  https://www   medical students to manage emergencies. Medicine (Baltimore).
            .acep.org/globalassets/new-pdfs/policy-statements/high-threat   2017 Feb;96(5):e5933. PMID: 28151877.
            -event-casualty-care.pdf. Accessed January 09, 2022.
          2.  Tang N, Kubit J, Berrett OM, Levy MJ. A multiyear analysis of
            the clinical encounters of the ATF tactical medical program. J Spec
            Oper Med. 2014 Fall;14(3):102–6. PMID: 25344717.  Keywords: Tactical Emergency Medical Support; TEMS; tactical
          3.  Levy MJ, Smith R, Gerold KB, Alves DW, Tang N. Clinical en-  medicine; standardized patient methodology
            counters in tactical medicine: a mission-specific analysis of the
            Maryland State Police experience. J Spec Oper Med. 2014 Sum-
            mer;14(2):98–104. PMID: 24952050.







          132  |  JSOM   Volume 22, Edition 1 / Sping 2022
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139