Page 40 - JSOM Winter 2021
P. 40

challenges managing physiological arousal) builds tolerance   in providing performance enhancement training. Training ef-
          and a skill set that can “inoculate” the trainee to more signif-  forts were  found to be sporadic, resulting in SIT  not being
          icant stressors, thereby reducing the negative impact of stress   used to its full potential among high-intensity/high-risk occu-
          psychologically and physically, thus increasing resilience and   pa tional groups. More importantly, researchers isolated the
          performance in the face of stressors.              challenges that were limiting the integration of SIT more
                                                             formally and deliberately for human performance, 30–32  which
          Traditional SIT protocols incorporate an interlocking tripha-  mirrored those identified with SIT protocols in the clinical
          sic design: Phase I (Education/Conceptualization), Phase II   context. 40,41  These challenges included a lack of core content,
          (Skills Acquisition and Rehearsal), and Phase III (Application   manualization, and measurement capability (which was lim-
          and Follow-Through). 29,30  Targets of a specific intervention   iting reproducibility), as well as formalized processes for de-
          are identified; then education and skill elements are carefully   ployment in group settings. Recommendations were made to
                                                                                  30
          selected for each phase. Skills and training elements are then   overcome these limitations;  those most salient to the current
          scaffolded to confer a rapidly enhancing skill set, with each   project included:
          skill building upon the others, culminating in exposure in sim-
          ulations and/or real-world applications to solidify target skills   1.  Develop curricula for SIT with an emphasis on core skills
          in relevant environments. 29,30                      that facilitate performance enhancement.
                                                             2.  Identify opportunities to integrate common stressors from
          Psychological Performance Enhancement Context        downrange experiences.
          In 2014, a large-scale review of modern stress theories and for-  3.  Ensure that applicable skills are mastered before exposure
          malized state-of-the-art strategies being utilized by US Military   to stressful conditions.
          assets examined  SIT and stress exposure  training (a similar   4.  Continue to provide sufficient opportunities to practice
          paradigm). The RAND Study (Project Air Force), Enhanc-  new coping skills under “real” performance conditions.
          ing Performance Under Stress: Stress Inoculation Training   5.  Consider supporting SIT with virtual reality technology.
          for Battlefield Airmen,  outlined a body of evidence demon-  6.  Continue efforts to identify valid screening tools to predict
                            30
          strating the efficacy of SIT in the human performance context   success in stressful conditions.
          among military personnel in multiple high-risk/high-intensity   7.  Develop measures to support the evaluation of screening
          occupational specialties. Training targets included enhancing   tools and SIT.
          stress tolerance, managing physiological arousal, increasing   8.  Provide information to increase awareness of support ser-
          complex adaptive skill sets, and improving general function-  vices for mental health.
          ing, performance, and resilience to stress. 31–39
                                                             Development of SIT-NORCAL
          Key findings demonstrated that individuals can be trained to   This project was undertaken in direct response to the recom-
                                                                                       30
          effectively minimize the destructive effects of stress on human   mendations of the RAND study.  The resulting protocol is
          performance: (1) Through formalized training and stepwise,   a unique, culturally congruent psychological performance en-
          structured exposure to stressors, individuals can cultivate nec-  hancement and health sustainment (i.e., evidence-based treat-
          essary skills and countermeasures (i.e., can be “inoculated”   ment) hybrid, designed specifically for warfighters and combat
          against the adverse impact of physical and psychological   veterans. SIT-NORCAL is a manualized but flexible protocol
          stress), thereby improving optimal performance capability   delivered on a continuum that interlocks evidence-based psy-
          under a range of stressful conditions. (2) Formalized educa-  chological performance enhancement techniques with key ele-
          tion, skills training, and focused exposure to occupationally   ments from “gold standard” psychological health interventions
                                                                    40
          relevant stressors are important core components for prepar-  for PTSD  (i.e., cognitive processing therapy and prolonged
          ing military personnel in high-risk/high-intensity occupational   exposure). This protocol can be delivered in both individual
          specialties to perform well under stress. 30       and group formats, and directly targets Neuropsychological
                                                             Optimization and Repair of Cognitive flexibility and agility
          Clinical Context                                   (i.e., thinking skills) and  Affect regulation (i.e., emotional
          While a far greater number of studies have established the   control/physiological control skills), using enhanced Learning
          potential of SIT in human performance enhancement appli-  science methods (NORCAL) to speed efficiency in acquisition
          cations,  SIT has also been recognized by the Veterans Ad-  and recall of task- and goal-relevant skill sets.
                30
          ministration (VA) and Department of Defense (DoD) as a
          second-line treatment for PTSD.  Preliminary investigations
                                    40
          on forms of SIT have suggested potential promise in overcom-  Methods
          ing barriers to treatment initiation, reducing the symptoms of   Initial content and process elements of the SIT-NORCAL pro-
          posttraumatic stress among combat veterans 31,40,41  and enhanc-  tocol were configured for performance enhancement and battle-
          ing resilience against PTSD and stress disorders among mil-  field applications via phased education among both individuals
          itary personnel. 31,32  This combined body of literature makes   and groups of US Air Force personnel in special tactics (combat
          SIT an ideal paradigm for configuration as an evidence-based/  controllers, joint terminal attack controllers, tactical air control
          evidence-driven human performance and health sustainment   party) and first response personnel (combat medics) from 2010
          hybrid.                                            to 2013. Subject matter experts from multiple specialty fields
                                                             were consulted in regard to initial material designs: operational
          Implementation (Content and Process Challenges)    psychology (n = 2), clinical psychology (n = 1), and neuropsy-
          Despite being a well-established, well-accepted strategy, the   chology (n = 2). Formal study of the efficacy of SIT-NORCAL
          RAND study  identified that instructors providing training in   as a health sustainment and restoration (i.e., treatment) proto-
                    30
          SIT techniques to airmen were mostly offering skills ad hoc,   col began in 2013, when it was revised and expanded for appli-
          and there was usually very limited support from psychologists   cations among combat veterans with PTSD and TBI.


          38  |  JSOM   Volume 21, Edition 4 / Winter 2021
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45