Page 93 - JSOM Winter 2018
P. 93

to the shooter without decreasing shooter capability as long as   Disclosure
              added weapon length is not detrimental to mission outcomes.  The authors have nothing to disclose.

              Recommendations                                    Funding
                                                                 This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secre-
              We think .50-caliber rifles can be successfully integrated into   tary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Broad Agency
              operations with minimal disturbance and risk to shooters if   Announcement (Award no. W81XWH-16-2-0001) for all ma-
              care is taken. Where possible, avoid firing from inside enclosed   terial and transportation costs.
              spaces or atop rigid structures. Substantial attention should
              be applied to muzzle device selection. If resources allow the   Disclaimer
              integration of a suppressor onto the weapon platform, it is   Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations
              highly advisable. We also recommend firing from the stand-  are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by
              ing position where possible. To facilitate a stable platform,   the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
              secondary equipment such as rifle rest/tripods (e.g., Spec-rest,   No funding or discount was offered by TacFlow academy
              HOG Saddle, and Reaper Grip) is worth investing in for oper-  aside from access to subjects and facilities.
              ational deployments. Training doctrine should also note that
              when firing with multiple shooters on the line, or with spot-  Author Contributions
              ters and instructors near the shooter, it is possible that these   ML provided access to the training facilities and overall struc-
              immediate bystanders are also receiving OP of greater than   ture to the research questions and writing assistance. GHK
              the 4-psi threshold. In addition, due to the forces involved,   provided the scientific investigation, research protocol, fund-
              double ear-protection (i.e., in ear and over ear) devices are   ing, material, and writing assistance. AM collected the field
              strongly suggested to be used at all times for operators and   data, prepared the data for analysis, and provided editorial
              observers.                                         support. CRL conducted analyses and contributed signifi-
                                                                 cantly to the conceptualization and drafting of the manuscript.
                                                                 ANR and MYG assisted significantly in data preparation and
              Conclusion
                                                                 collection. MJE drafted the manuscript and conducted the
              Taken together, a capable .50-caliber rifle program can be de-  analyses.
              veloped that minimizes potential risk to shooter health and
              effectiveness without compromising field capability and read-  References
              iness. Resources did not allow sufficient investigation into   1.  Lang M. The emergence of the SWAT .50 caliber rifle. Tactical
              ammunition in this project, but we suspect that additional   Edge Magazine. 2017;Spring:64–70.
              benefits can be gained by careful selection of ammunition   2.  Westine PS. The blast field about the muzzle of guns. Shock and
                                                                    Vibration Bulletin. 1969;March:139–150.
              during training that does not compromise marksmanship   3.  Gill J, Motamedi V, Osier N, et al. Moderate blast exposure re-
              outcomes but does help reduce blast exposure. Other efforts   sults in increased IL-6 and TNFα in peripheral blood. Brain Be-
              have indicated the value in pairing ammunition to operational   hav Immun. 2017;65:90 –94.
              needs,  and treating training as a distinct environment may be   4.  Carr W, Stone JR, Walilko T, et al. Repeated low-level blast ex-
                  1
              appropriate to minimize operator risks to health and effective-  posure: a descriptive human subjects study. Mil Med. 2016;181:
              ness. Though these suggestions will likely not ensure a perfect   28–39.
              solution, substantial improvement over general practices can   5.  Tate CM, Wang KK, Eonta S, et al. Serum brain biomarker level,
                                                                    neurocognitive performance, and self-reported symptom changes
              be had for minimal adjustment to training and with some ad-  in soldiers repeatedly exposed to low-level blast: a breacher pilot
              ditional investment in equipment.                     study. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(19):1620–1630.
                                                                 6.  Kamimori GH, Da Silva U. Occupational over pressure (op) ex-
              In total, .50-caliber rifle fire represents a unique and nontriv-  posure in blast exposed military personnel during training: 946
              ial avenue of blast exposure to tactical response communities.   Board #262 June 1, 2:00 pm–3:30 pm. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
              Attention to these exposures as well as those of other sources   2016;48(5S, suppl 1):269.
              of blast (e.g., breaching, flash bang) is worthwhile to ensure   7.  Carr W, Polejaeva E, Grome A, et al. Relation of repeated low-
                                                                    level blast exposure with symptomology similar to concussion. J
              operational effectiveness and reduce potential health conse-  Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015;30(1):47–55.
              quences. OP can have negative consequences for performance   8.  Hirsch FG. Effects of overpressure on the ear—a review. Ann N Y
              and health in some scenarios. 10–13  Current reports on blast tend   Acad Sci. 1968;152(1):147–162.
              to have consensus that, to some degree, increased OP pres-  9.  Kubli LR, Pinto RL, Burrows HL, et al. The effects of repeated
              ents increased probability of harm to the recipient. The nature   low-level blast exposure on hearing in marines.  Noise Health.
                                                                    2017;19(90):227–238.
              of that relationship is not yet fully understood (e.g., current   10.  Dekosky ST, Milos D, Ikonomivic MD, et al. Traumatic brain
              findings cannot definitively say that X psi is exactly  n less   injury—football, warfare, and long-term effects. N Engl J Med.
              damaging than 2X) but the idea of minimizing OP exposure is   2010;363(14):1293–1296.
              generally accepted as a reasonable step that can help minimize   11.  Carr W, Yarnell AM, Ong R, et al. Ubiquitin carboxy-terminal
              potential for harm and maintain performance.          hydrolase-L1 as a serum neurotrauma biomarker for exposure to
                                                                    occupational low level blast. Front Neurol. 2015;6:49.
                                                                 12.  Goldstein LE, Fisher AM, Tagge CA, et al. Chronic traumatic en-
              Acknowledgments                                       cephalopathy in blast-exposed military veterans and a blast neu-
              We thank SPC Bill McQuiggan, SPC T. Reece, SGT A. Alviar,   rotrauma mouse model. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(134):134ra60.
              E. Rodriguez, and CPL J. Dougherty for their significant con-  13.  St Onge P, McIlwain DS, Hill ME, et al. Marine Corps Breacher
              tributions to the collection and preparation of the data used   Training Study: uuditory and vestibular findings. US Army Med
                                                                    Dep J. 2011;Jul-Sep:97–107.
              in this manuscript. We thank contributing staff of the Wal-
              ter Reed Army Institute of Research for their assistance in the
              completion of this study and the preparation of this article.

                                                                 Shooter-Experienced Blast Overpressure in .50-Caliber Rifles  |  91
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98