Page 101 - JSOM Fall 2018
P. 101
Functional Capacity SMD (95% CI) 0.49 (0.35, 0.63) 0.56 (0.24, 0.87) 0.60 (0.37, 0.83) 0.22 (0.07, 0.37) 0.52 (0.39, 0.64) 0.15 (0.04, 0.26) 0.20 (0.08, 0.32) ND ND ND ND ND 0.56 (0.39, 0.73) 0.64 (0.28, 1.00) 0.49 (0.33, 0.65) 0.75 (0.52, 0.98) 0.10 (−0.13, 0.33)
Outcomes Trials a (no.) 35 8 23 10 44 10 7 ND ND ND ND ND 50 19 31 8 4
SMD (95% CI) 0.50 (0.39, 0.62) 0.67 (0.39, 0.94) 0.62 (0.45, 0.79) 0.16 (−0.04, 0.37) 0.49 (0.39, 0.59) 0.24 (0.14, 0.35) 0.08 (−0.15, 0.30) 0.53 (0.29, 0.70) 0.40 (−0.25, 1.06) 0.49 (0.29, 0.70) 0.23 (−0.03, 0.48) 0.22 (−0.06, 0.51) 0.57 (0.42, 0.73) 0.62 (0.32, 0.93) 0.52 (0.35, 0.68) 0.77 (0.41, 1.13) 0.23 (0.04, 0.42)
Pain
Trials a (no.) 47 9 32 13 44 12 6 4 4 6 3 2 56 22 34 8 5
Any exercise versus no exercise Aerobic versus control Strength versus control Mixed exercise versus control treatment Exercise versus control at 2–6 months Exercise versus control >6 months (<3.3 months) Landbased exercise versus control on WOMAC (<3.3 months) (<3.3 months) Landbased exercise versus control on WOMAC (4–12 months) Landbased exercise versus control on WOMAC (>12 months) Any strength training versus control contro
Comparisons Exercise versus control immediately after Aquatic exercise versus control on WOMAC Landbased exercise versus control on VAS Strength training using ACSM guidelines versus Strength training not using ACSM guidelines Chinese exercise versus nonexercise control
Inclusion Criteria, Type of Exercise (Range of Years Considered in Review) Patients with clinically or radiologically diagnosed knee OA. Exercise group compared with nonexercise control group. (Study Participants with knee OA according to accepted criteria. Any landbased exercise program compared with nonexercise control. Adults with clinically or radiologically diagnosed hip OA. Any aquatic or landbased exercise program. Compared effects
years up to 2012) (Study years up to 2013) months. (Study years up to 2014) years up to 2015) Scale; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. c One study excluded by authors because of large effect size.
TABLE 1 Cont. Row First Author No. Juhl 59 11 Fransen 60 12 Beumer 61 13 Bartholdy 62 14 Zhang 63 15 Magni 64 16 within the single study.
Osteoarthritis and Exercise | 99

