Page 77 - JSOM Summer 2018
P. 77

Optimizing Tactical Medical Performance

                                       The Effect of Light Hue on Vision Testing



                                                                         2
                                                     1
                            J. Preston Van Buren, DO *; Jeffrey Wake, DO ; Jared McLaughlin, DO ;
                                                                                                 3
                                      4
                 Anthony LaPorta, MD ; Robert W. Enzenauer, MD, MPH, MSS, MBA ; Chris Calvano, MD, PhD       6
                                                                                   5
              ABSTRACT
              Background: Red and blue are the historical tactical lighting   Introduction
              hues of choice to ensure light discipline and to preserve dark
              adaptation. As yet, no scientifically ideal hue for use in Spe-  The austere combat conditions typifying Special Operations
              cial Operations medicine has been identified. We propose red/  medicine (SOFMED) require balance between successful visual
              green polychromatic light as a superior choice that preserves   task completion and preservation of tactical light discipline to
              visual function for tactical medical tasks in austere settings.   minimize risk. A survey of SOFMED Operators published in
              Methods:  Thirty participants were enrolled in this institu-  2013 indicated that casualty outcomes were directly affected,
                                                                                                                1
              tional review board–approved study. Participants completed   both positively and negatively, by the lighting system used.
              four vision tasks in low-light settings under various lighting   Our goal for this study was to identify the optimal lighting
              conditions. The Pelli-Robson Near Contrast Sensitivity test   hue for performance of SOFMED visual and technical tasks
              (PR), tumbling E visual acuity test, Farnsworth D-15 color-   while maintaining Operator and casualty concealment across
              vision test (FD15), and pseudoisochromatic plate (PiP) testing   ground, marine, and aviation settings.
              was performed under white, green, or red light illumination
              and also red/green and red/green/yellow lights. PR and tum-  In this study, we quantify the impact of illumination wave-
              bling E tests were performed using blue and blue/red lights.   length on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and color vision.
              Results: The test results for each light were compared against   We predicted that red/green polychromatic lights would out-
              a white-light standard. Contrast sensitivity as measured by   perform other polychromatic lights and monochromatic lights
              PR testing showed no statistical difference when white light   when compared with a white-light standard.
              was used compared with red/green or red/green/yellow light,
              and the differences between red, green, blue, and blue/red all   Methods
              were statistically  different from when white light was used.
              When measuring visual acuity, blue light was the only color   A total of 30 healthy, first- and second-year volunteer medical
              for which there was a statistically significant decrease in visual   students from Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic
              acuity in comparison with white. There was no reduction in vi-  Medicine (RVUCOM) and Kansas City University of Medicine
              sual acuity with any other lights compared with white. Perfor-  and Biosciences College of Osteopathic Medicine volunteered
              mance on FD15 testing with all single-hue and multihue lights   to be a part of this study, which took place between May 1
              was significantly worse than with white light for measuring   and May 14, 2016. RVUCOM’s Human Institutional Review
              color-vision perception. Color discrimination as measured by   Board approved the study (HIRB approval no. 2014-003).
              PiP testing showed red and green light was significantly worse   Participants were not color blind and, if needed, used any cor-
              than with white light, whereas test results when green/red and   rective vision devices such as contacts or glasses so that vision
              green/red/yellow lights were used were not statistically differ-  was corrected to at least 20/20. Colorblind participants and
              ent from white. Conclusion: Red/Green/yellow and red/green   participants with corrected or uncorrected vision worse than
              were superior light sources and performance results only were   20/20 were excluded.
              worse than white light on FD15 testing.
                                                                 Each subject completed four vision tasks in low-light indoor
                                                                 settings  under different  lighting  conditions.  All lights  were
              Keywords: SOFMED; tactical lighting; visual acuity; contrast   Tomahawk tactical lights (First-Light USA, https://www.first
              sensitivity; color vision
                                                                 light-usa.com; Figure 1). The white, monochromatic red, mono-
                                                                 chromatic blue, monochromatic green, duochromatic blue/red,
              *Correspondence to 3001 South Downing St, Englewood, CO 80113; or jeffrey.vanburen@rvu.edu.
              1 ENS Van Buren was a medical student of the class of 2018 at Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine (RVUCOM). He is
              currently enrolled in the Navy Health Professional Scholarship Program.  2LT Wake was a medical student of the class of 2018 at RVUCOM.
                                                                 2
              He is currently enrolled in the Army Health Professional Scholarship Program. He has maintained his status as a Certified Athletic Trainer and
                                                                    3
              has worked in many capacities as an athletic trainer prior to medical school.  2LT McLaughlin was a medical student of the class of 2018 at
              RVUCOM. He is currently enrolled in the Air Force Health Professional Scholarship Program.  COL (Ret) LaPorta retired from the US Army as
                                                                               4
              a Colonel after over 26 years of service. He has served in every aspect of medical education and is currently the professor of Surgery and director
              of Rocky Vista University’s Military Medicine Honors Program.  BG (Ret) Enzenauer is a retired M-day Guardsman who served most recently
                                                           5
              as the assistant adjutant general for space and missile defense, Colorado Army National Guard, 2010–2015. In the civilian sector, Dr Enzenauer
              is professor of ophthalmology and pediatrics and chief of ophthalmology at the Children’s Hospital of Colorado in Aurora. D. Enzenauer has
                                                                           6
              over four decades of uniformed service on active duty and in the Army National Guard.  MAJ Calvano is an oculoplastic surgeon and currently
              serves as the US Army Reserve Ophthalmology Consultant to the Surgeon General. A Fellow of the American College of Surgeons and also the
              American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dr Calvano has been deployed as a flight surgeon with combat aviation to
              Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Iraq. He recently was in an Active Duty Operational Support position as medical liaison officer in the US Army Special
              Operations Command G9 Science and Technology division.
                                                              75
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82