Page 50 - JSOM Summer 2018

endorsement or approval of the products or services of these 15. White L, Dressendorfer R, Muller S, et al. Effectiveness of cy-
organizations. The views expressed in this report are those of cle cross-training between competitive seasons in female distance
the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy runners. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17:319–323.
of the Department of Defense, Department of the Army, US 16. Mutton D, Loy S, Roger D, et al. Effect of run vs combined cy-
Army Medical Department or the US Government. cle/run training on VO2 max and running performance. Med Sci
Sports Exerc. 1993;25:1393–1397.
17. Reynolds K, Harman E, Worsham R, et al. Injuries in women
Disclosures associated with a periodized strength training and running pro-
The authors have indicated they have no financial relation- gram. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15:136–143.
ships relevant to this article to disclose. 18. Grier T, Canham-Chervak M, Anderson M, et al. The effects of
cross-training on fitness and injury in women. US Army Med Dep
J. 2015;April–June:33–41.
Author Contributions 19. Knapik JJ, Rieger W, Palkoska F, et al. United States Army phys-
TG was responsible for project plan development, data man- ical readiness training: rationale and evaluation of the physical
agement, data analysis, interpretation, and reporting. MA was training doctrine. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23:1353–1362.
responsible for data management, data analysis, interpreta- 20. Grier T, Chervak M, McNulty V, et al. Extreme conditioning pro-
tion, and reporting. PD, RE, BN, and BJ were responsible for grams and injury risk in a U.S. Army brigade combat team. US
project plan development, interpretation, and reporting. Army Med Dep J. 2013;Oct–Dec:36–47.
21. Bullock SH, Jones BH, Gilchrist J, et al. Prevention of physical
training-related injuries. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:S156–S181.
References 22. Kraemer W, Mazzetti S, Nindl B, et al. Effect of resistance train-
1. Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Harman E. Soldier load carriage: histor- ing on women’s strength/power and occupational performances.
ical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects. Mil Med. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;33:1011–1025.
2004;169:45–56. 23. Rana S, Chleboun G, Gilders R, et al. Comparison of early phase
2. Taylor N, Peoples G, Peterson S. Load carriage, human perfor- adaptations for traditional strength and endurance, and low
mance, and employment standards. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. velocity resistance training programs in college-aged women. J
2016;41:S131–S147. Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:119–127.
3. Kelly TK, Masi R, Walker B, et al. An assessment of the Army’s 24. Hendrickson N, Sharp M, Alemany J, et al. Combined resistance
tactical human optimization, rapid rehabilitation and recondi- and endurance training improves physical capacity and perfor-
tioning program. Rand Health Q. 2013;3(2):8. mance on tactical occupational tasks. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;
4. US Army. FM 7-22 Army Physical Readiness Training. Washing- 109:1197–1208.
ton, DC: US Army Physical Fitness School; 2012. 25. Kraemer W, Vescovi J, Volek J, et al. Effects of concurrent resis-
5. Knipscher B. THOR3: humans are more important than hard- tance and aerobic training on load-bearing performance and the
ware [thesis]. Monterey, CA: Navy Postgraduate School; 2010. Army physical fitness test. Mil Med. 2004;169:994–999.
6. Martin R, Grier T, Canham-Chervak M, et al. Validity of self-re- 26. Kraemer WJ, Vogel JA, Patton JF, et al. The Effects of Various
ported physical performance and BMI in a military population. J Physical Training Programs on Short Duration, High Intensity
Strength Cond Res. 2016;30:26–32. Load Bearing Performance and the Army Physical Fitness Test.
7. Feger M, Herb C, Fraser J, et al. Supervised rehabilitation versus Technical Report. Natick MA: US Army Research Institute of En-
home exercise in the treatment of acute ankle sprains: a system- vironmental Medicine; 1987. Report No.: T30-87.
atic review. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34:329–346. 27. Hirofumi T, Swensen T. Impact of resistance training on endur-
8. Franche R, Cullen K, Clarke J, et al. Workplace-based return-to- ance performance. Sports Med. 1998;25:191–200.
work interventions: A systematic review of the quantitative liter- 28. Bell G, Syrotuik D, Martin T, et al. Effect of concurrent strength
ature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:607–631. and endurance training on skeletal muscle properties and hormone
9. Larson M, Renier C, Konowalchuk B. Reducing lost workdays concentrations in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81:418–427.
after work-related injuries. The utilization of athletic trainers in a 29. Dudley GA, Djamil R. Incompatibility of endurance- and
health system transitional work program. J Occup Environ Med. strength-training modes of exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1985;59:
2011;53:1199–1204. 1446–1451.
10. Zimmerman G. Industrial medicine and athletic training: cost- 30. Arazi H, Faraji H, Moghadam M, et al. Effects of concurrent ex-
effectiveness in the non-traditional setting. J Athl Train. 1993;28: ercise protocols on strength, aerobic power, flexibility and body
131–136. composition. Kinesiology. 2011;43:155–162.
11. Garcia-Pinillos F, Camara-Perez J, Soto-Hermoso V, et al. A high 31. Hakkinen K, Alen M, Kraemer W, et al. Neuromuscular adapta-
intensity interval training (HIIT)-based running plan improves tions during concurrent strength and endurance training versus
athletic performance by improving muscle power. J Strength strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;89:42–52.
Cond Res. In press. 32. Nindl B. Physical training strategies for military women’s per-
12. Gibala M, Gagnon P, Nindl B. Military applicability of interval formance optimization in combat-centric occupations. J Strength
training for health and performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; Cond Res. 2015;29:S101–S106.
29:S40–S45. 33. Nindl B, Williams T, Deuster P, et al. Strategies for optimizing mil-
13. Walker T, Lennemann L, Zupan M, et al. Adaptations to a New itary physical readiness and preventing musculoskeletal injuries
Physical Training Program in the Combat Controller Training Pipe- in the 21st century. US Army Med Dep J. 2013;Oct–Dec:5–23.
line. Technical Report. Brooks City-Base, TX: Air Force Research
Laboratory; 2010. Report No.: AFRL-RH-BR-TR-2010-0067.
14. Aspenes S, Kjendlie P, Hoff J, et al. Combined strength and en-
durance training in competitive swimmers. J Strength Cond Res.
2009;8:357–365.

48 | JSOM Volume 18, Edition 2/Summer 2018