Page 31 - JSOM Summer 2018
P. 31

patent. If a needle thoracostomy becomes obstructed, it is sim-  followed by either simple (finger) thoracostomy or chest tube
              pler to put in a second one rather than attempt a chest tube in   placement, but only if shocks persists after two attempts at
              the field. The 2nd needle thoracostomy should be just as effec-  needle decompression and after having accomplished the other
              tive as the first one. Continuous monitoring and reassessment of   circulation measures listed above. In cases of pneumothorax
              patients is necessary whether a needle or chest tube is in place.” 85  or hemothorax, a simple (finger) thoracostomy will defini-
                                                                 tively ensure that the pleural cavity has been entered and de-
                                                                 compressed, while tube thoracostomy will drain the chest and
              Recommendation:
                                                                 allow the lung to re-expand. Only those combat medical pro-
              If the initial NDC was successful, but symptoms later recur:  viders who have the appropriate skills, equipment, and autho-
              –  Perform another NDC at the same site that was used previ-  rization should perform these invasive procedures.
                ously. Use a new needle/catheter unit for the repeat NDC.
              –  Continue to re-assess!                          A description of finger thoracostomy (FT) was provided by
                                                                 High: “FT is performed the same way (as tube thoracostomy),
              What should be done if the second NDC is also not successful?  but a tube is not introduced immediately into the pleural cav-
              If two needle decompressions have been attempted and there   ity. FT serves as a quick and definitive way to address or rule
              has been no clinical improvement, the casualty’s signs and   out tension pneumothorax.”  No studies were identified,
                                                                                        53
              symptoms may be caused by hemorrhagic shock or other con-  however, that document that finger thoracostomies will reli-
              ditions. The treating combat medical provider should there-  ably remain patent and continue to prevent tension pneumo-
              fore turn his or her attention to the next step in the sequence   thorax in the presence of an ongoing air leak from the lung
              of care in the TCCC Guidelines—Circulation.        injury without chest tube insertion.

                                                                 Chest trauma that causes clinically significant pneumothorax
              Recommendation:
                                                                 or hemothorax will be treated with immediate tube thoracos-
              If the second NDC is also not successful:          tomy at the casualty’s first medical treatment facility, but insert-
              –  Continue on to the Circulation section of the TCCC   ing chest tubes in the prehospital combat setting has not been
                Guidelines.                                      well-documented to improve outcomes. A 1985 Israeli study
                                                                 reported that only 8 of 16 prehospital chest tubes were inserted
              What is the prehospital treatment of refractory shock?  correctly and for the appropriate indications by physicians.
                                                                                                               88
              Although untreated tension pneumothorax can potentially re-  A more recent study from the Israeli Defense Force noted that
              sult in shock and death, a far more common cause of prevent-  35 prehospital chest tubes had been placed after failed NDC,
              able death on the battlefield is shock that results from ongoing   but the difference in outcomes associated with use of this more
              noncompressible hemorrhage. Shock from massive hemorrhage   invasive intervention were not well described.  There are reports
                                                                                                   6
              and shock from tension pneumothorax may be difficult to dif-  from the civilian sector that indicate that simple or tube tho-
              ferentiate in the prehospital setting, since there may be con-  racostomy can be safely and effectively accomplished by pre-
              siderable overlap in the physical findings. Since hemorrhagic   hospital personnel and should be considered when NDC has
              shock is a far more common cause of preventable death in com-  failed. 31,34,53,57,68,89,90  The importance of experience in perform-
              bat casualties than shock from tension pneumothorax,  and   ing tube thoracostomy was highlighted by a 2017 study which
                                                         1
              since NDC will treat only the latter condition, it is important   noted that the complication rate for chest tube insertion was sig-
              to undertake hemorrhage control and resuscitation measures   nificantly greater (17%) when the procedure was performed by
              before returning to the possibility of a tension pneumothorax.  interns compared with 7% when the procedure was performed
                                                                 by residents.  Another study found that clinical improvement
                                                                          91
              The combat medical provider should, therefore, proceed   after tube thoracostomy was 61% compared with an improve-
              through the circulation section of the TCCC Guidelines and:  ment rate after NDC of 54%. The lack of a large increase in the
              –  Ensure that all external hemorrhage is controlled 3  clinical improvement rate in this study is an important point to
              –  Apply a pelvic binder if indicated 86           bear in mind when considering more invasive interventions.
                                                                                                               92
              –  Assess for shock                                The authors of that study concluded: “From these data, we
              –  Start an IV or IO infusion if needed            conclude that (needle decompression) is a relatively rapid inter-
              –  Administer TXA if hemorrhagic shock is present or likely 87  vention in the treatment of suspected (tension pneumothorax)
              –  Perform fluid resuscitation with blood products if possible 25  in the prehospital setting; however, (tube thoracostomy) is an
                                                                 effective adjunct for definitive care without increasing morbid-
              After all of the above interventions have been performed as in-  ity or mortality. A better understanding of the physiology of
              dicated, if the shock state persists, the combat medical provider   intrapleural air masses is needed to determine the most effective
              should consider untreated tension pneumothorax as a possible   decompression requirements prior to aeromedical transport.” 92
              cause of refractory shock. Findings of thoracic trauma, per-
              sistent respiratory distress, absent breath sounds on one side   Consideration should also be given to decompressing the con-
              of the chest, and hemoglobin oxygen saturation less than 90%   tralateral side of the chest if the injury pattern suggests that
              would lend support to this diagnosis. In a casualty who has   that is appropriate. Other interventions that may alleviate
              had at least two failed NDCs and who is suffering from refrac-  shortness of breath include ketamine administration for pain
              tory shock, more definitive measures need to be considered. 82  control  and supplemental oxygen.
                                                                      3
              Suspected tension pneumothorax should be treated in the   Recommendation:
              prehospital setting with the least invasive intervention that
              will successfully resolve the casualty’s shock and/or respira-  If a casualty in shock is not responding to fluid resuscitation,
              tory distress. This translates to needle decompression first,   consider untreated tension pneumothorax as a possible cause

                                                                                      TCCC Guidelines Change 17-02  |  29
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36