Page 74 - JSOM Spring 2018
P. 74

Racemic  ketamine was administered  by PJs on missions on   short flight time that there was not enough time to administer
          which PJs were performing rotary wing (i.e., HH-60) tacti-  a second dose.
          cal evacuation. Each patient had some sort of ground medical
          response before PJs picked up the patient. The details of who   The most common route of ketamine administration was IM
          (i.e., what level of provider) treated the patient on the ground   (n = 10 patients), and the most common dose given was 50mg,
          were not recorded.                                 though it is noteworthy that two patients received only one
                                                             25mg dose IM and still had significant enough reduction of
          After any mission during which ketamine was administered, the   their pain documented that they did not require additional
          PJs were asked to complete a simple survey form indicating the   analgesia.
          patient’s injuries, mechanism of injury, pain level, need for ad-
          ministration of ketamine, dosing of ketamine, route of admin-  None of the patients experienced adverse reactions. The dos-
          istration, and any changes in status during the course of their   ing, route, pain levels before and after ketamine, and details of
          flight, including adverse reactions or the need to administer an-  ketamine administration are listed in Table 1.
          other dose. After each mission, the flight surgeon debriefed the
          PJs for confirmation of indications, outcomes, or unexpected   Discussion
          results before entering deidentified data into a tracker.
                                                             Analgesia for battlefield injuries has traditionally been accom-
          Clinical Guidelines                                plished with opioid medications such as morphine since the
          The standard analgesic dosage recommended was 25mg in-  time of the US Civil War until very recently in the Operation
          travenously (IV) or intraosseously (IO) over 1 minute with   Iraqi Freedom/OEF campaigns. In World War I, dressing sta-
          repeated doses of 20mg every 15–30 minutes as needed or un-  tions outside of the immediate battlefield used morphine as the
          til nystagmus occurred, or 50mg intramuscularly (IM) every   primary method of pain control. At that time, these dressing
          15–30 minutes or until nystagmus occurred.         stations were considered the frontline of medicine; fortunately,
                                                             our current Combat Medics provide analgesic treatment at the
          Contraindications for use of this medication included hyper-  location of the active combat engagement. Since the inception
          sensitivity and acute ocular globe injury. Medics were in-  of morphine in 1804, it has been the standard for treatment
          structed on the ketamine adverse-effect profile, including   of pain. However, it is common knowledge that morphine
          hypertension, laryngospasm, respiratory depression, emer-  and other opioids have significant drawbacks and adverse ef-
          gence reaction, and hypersalivation.  Of note, study findings   fects that complicate their use, especially in trauma patients.
                                      12
          suggest that increased intraocular pressure may be as low as   Known adverse effects include addiction, nausea and vomit-
          1.6mmHg, which is likely of little to no consequence, and has   ing, hypotension, and decreased respiratory drive; the latter
          subsequently felt to be not clinically relevant.  Head injuries   two can be detrimental in an acutely injured patient.  In the
                                              13
                                                                                                       16
          were previously considered a contraindication for ketamine;   current battle space, traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been a
          however, this contraindication was associated with very high   major injury and the potential for opioids to cause respira-
          doses of ketamine. Results of several recent studies, compris-  tory depression with subsequent hypoxia/anoxia can worsen
          ing more than 900 critically ill patients, caused researchers to   TBI symptoms and outcome. This is not a new phenomenon;
          conclude ketamine did not adversely affect cerebral perfusion   anoxic brain injury from morphine toxicity was well docu-
          pressure, neurologic outcome, or mortality. 14,15  mented in World War II. 17

                                                             It was not until 1960, when fentanyl citrate was incorporated
          Results
                                                             in clinical practice, that there was an alternative to morphine
          A total of 12 patients received ketamine for analgesia during   without the potential hypotensive effects. Forty years later, the
          the course of this deployment. Eight had been involved in im-  fentanyl citrate trans-buccal lozenge was created. However,
          provised explosive device explosions, five sustained gunshot   only 25% of the lozenge is absorbed directly; 75% is swal-
          wounds, and one sustained a nonbattle related injury. Pain   lowed  and  undergoes  first-pass  hepatic  metabolism.  Studies
          relief was determined by the treating PJ on the basis of their   from Camp Bastion in 2010 showed frequent delay of anal-
          clinical evaluation and patient interaction after administration   gesic onset with the trans-buccal fentanyl route.  In addition,
                                                                                                  18
          of each dose of pain medication. Two patients were excluded   the risk of adverse effects such as decreased respiratory drive
          from the study because of incomplete data collection or short   and hypotension prevent fentanyl from being an ideal analge-
          time from administration of ketamine to landing, and uncer-  sic for many patients in tactical locations where medical per-
          tainty about the clinical response.                sonnel are few and evacuation times are unreliable.

          Of the 10 patients included in this report who required pain   Concurrently with the efforts the Pararescue community, the
          control with ketamine, seven had received an opioid medica-  MERTs, who were colocated at Camp Bastion, began report-
          tion before PJ evaluation. No patients required redosing of   ing the effectiveness of ketamine for prehospital analgesia.
          ketamine for pain control. Pain was scored as mild, moderate,   From that time, the Pararescue community began to exam-
          or severe on the basis of the PJs’ judgement. This included   ine the role of ketamine as a primary method for analgesia
          clinical appearance of patients who did not speak English.  on the battlefield and for TACEVAC. It was not long after
                                                             that ketamine became the drug of choice for providers on the
          Eight of the 10 patients experienced a significant decrease in   battlefield. 19
          pain, with initial pain being reduced to mild or none. One of
          the 10 patients did not have a postketamine pain assessment   In 2011, USAF PJs began carrying ketamine for analgesic use
          documented. Another was assessed to be in severe pain after   and for sedation, including RSI. After its inception in the Para-
          the initial ketamine 50mg IM dose (patient 2) but had such a   rescue community, anecdotal stories began to emerge that,


          70  |  JSOM   Volume 18, Edition 1/Spring 2018
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79