Page 36 - JSOM Winter 2017
P. 36

Glove effects on performance were found consistently with
          three of eight glove types. Furthermore, performance times
          (i.e., time to hemorrhage control, trial time, overall time) with
          thicker gloves were generally slower than those with thinner
          gloves. The thinnest glove type, examination gloves, resulted   Figure 2  Four
          in  performance  much  like  bare  hands,  whereas  the  thickest   Components of
          glove type, cold gloves layered under mittens, was significantly   Best Care.
          outperformed by bare hands. Glove effects were negative by
          slowing and worsening performance, and three groups (cold
          gloves, mittens, and cold gloves layered under mittens) of-
          ten had significant effects, whereas others, like examination
          gloves, flight gloves, and glove liners, had no significant ef-  Best care can be seen as that type of pyramid with only four faces,
          fects. For time to determination of bleeding control and blood   each of which is a triangle, as shown in the diagram. For example,
                                                             tourniquet caregiving includes dynamic interplay of its components: a
          loss, the glove effects for each of these same three groups were   patient, a caregiver, a situation, and an intervention, as represented in
          worse than bare hands.                             the pyramid. Each corner is a component, and each edge is a potential
                                                             interaction between components. Each component can change, which
                                                             may alter the status of any other component. In tourniquet use, the
          Actionable insights about gloves include the following: (1)   first change sought is in the patient: control of bleeding. The patient
          instructors can underscore that, on average, first aid perfor-  changes over time because of the intervention (tourniquet use) as the
          mance while already wearing examination gloves is similar to   limb under the tourniquet is compressed and gets smaller. A limb be-
          performance with bare hands; (2) tactical instructors can un-  coming smaller under the tourniquet over time can cause the wound
          derscore that, on average, first aid performance while already   to restart bleeding, another patient change. Such another change indi-
          wearing tactical gloves like flight gloves is similar to perfor-  cates a need for the caregiver to periodically recheck the patient and
                                                             the tourniquet to detect rebleeding early for prompt correction, such
          mance with bare hands; and (3) instructors can inform users   as by tightening the tourniquet more. This pyramid organizes many
          that, on average, performance is worse with thicker gloves like   observations in caregiving.
          cold weather gloves. However, in this study, the time to don
          gloves was not studied. Situations regarding gloves in standard   with different levels of experience. Performance was biased to-
          precautions are outlined in World Health Organization guid-  ward user 1 because he owned the gloves, had the best fit, and
          ance,  although the guideline is hospital oriented.  was most experienced user.
              10
          Device effects in use of tourniquets were found only for con-  Future directions for scholarly work are many. A literature re-
          tinuous metrics and were minor because they were often domi-  view of glove science, including textile and garment sciences,
          nated by user effects.                             may find information relevant to operational medicine. The
                                                             operational medicine community may develop subject matter
          The US Army reported in 2016 a new concept of tourniquet use   experts in topics such as glove science (e.g., personal protec-
          as four dynamically interrelated components: patient, caregiver,   tive equipment topic assigned to the gear guy as a committee’s
          situation, and intervention.  Interaction among these compo-  point man), skill development education, and talent manage-
                               21
          nents was represented schematically as a pyramid (Figure 2).   ment. In this study, pressures were problematic yet varied little
          Corners represented components and edges represented rela-  by user; additional research may lead to an explanation. Other
          tionships between components. Each component can change,   directions are listed in Table 4.
          and any change may affect any other component. The pyramid
          alters the perception from just seeing the tourniquet to look-  Table 4  Other Directions for Research
          ing at each component and at each interaction between com-  Control groups can be either negative (bare hands) or positive
          ponents. It is easy for people to repeat that tourniquets save   (examination gloves).
          lives. 38,39  Tourniquets do not save people. People save people.   Survey instructors and course directors for precautions practiced,
          A person uses a tourniquet. A tourniquet is just a tool. It is not   problems with compliance, and awareness challenges (e.g.,
                                                              comprehension of precaution guidelines or glove science).
          magic. In the end, lifesaving is about people. When we demys-
          tify tourniquets in this way for caregivers, they are empowered   User performance assessments may be useful, especially if
                                                              conducted locally.
          as they realize that it makes sense, and they can learn this new   Study time to don or doff gloves, performance effects, and benefits
          skill like they learned prior skills. Furthermore, we paraphrase   and risks to user and patient.
          what educators have told us about the pyramid idea, “Well,   Gloves as fomites may be worthy of study.
          duh! Users are the focus and need help preparing for care.   Other first aid interventions may have user effects worthy of analysis.
          That’s why education exists.” The pyramid is a general way
          to understand best care, and tourniquet use is one intervention   Videotape survey of student compliance with precautions during
                                                              classes.
          with substantial evidence illustrating such understanding.  Measure duration of assessments of wounds, tourniquets, pulses,
                                                              bleeding, and patients.
          The limitations of this study are based in its design as labora-  Measure torques of rod required by hand dominance, sex, age, and
          tory simulation and not caregiving in the wild. The findings   number of hands used.
          of this study pertain to the present methods, gloves, users,   Study decisions or judgments under uncertainty while rendering
          and tourniquet model, so readers should not extrapolate its   first aid.
          findings beyond that. The numbers of users, glove types, and   Study the qualities of supervision of users.
          tourniquet devices were limited, and so findings are not fully   Study space-suit gloves, firefighter gloves, nuclear-biological-
          generalizable. This study was a first attempt to compare glove   chemical gloves, military cold-weather gloves, and medieval
          types that may be used under different military situations and   chainmail layered under armored gauntlet gloves among jousting
          how gloves affect tourniquet performance as applied by users   knight reenactors.

          34  |  JSOM   Volume 17, Edition 4/Winter 2017
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41