Page 110 - JSOM Winter 2017

27. Luippold RS, Sulsky SI, Amoroso PJ. Effectiveness of an external 31. Department of the Army. Risk management. Army Techniques
ankle brace in reducing parachute-related ankle injuries. Inj Prev. Publication 5-19. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of
2011;17(1):58–61. the Army; 2014.
28. Knapik JJ, Spiess A, Swedler DI, et al. Systematic review of the 32. Weather Spark. Average weather on May 19 in Fort Bragg, North
parachute ankle brace for injury risk reduction and cost benefit. Carolina, United States. https://weatherspark.com/d/19562/5/19
Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:S182–S188. /Average-Weather-on-May-19-in-Fort-Bragg-North-Carolina
29. Department of the Army. Static line parachuting techniques and -United-States#Sections-Wind. Accessed 14 November 2017.
training. Training circular 3-21.220. Washington DC: Headquar-
ters, Department of the Army; 2013.
30. Knapik JJ, Graham B, Steelman R, et al. The advance tactical
parachute system (T-11): injuries during basic military parachute
training. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2011;82:935–940.

108 | JSOM Volume 17, Edition 4/Winter 2017