Page 43 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2017
P. 43

non-surgeons; however, no published data are available,     8.  Morrison JJ, Percival TJ, Markov NP, et al. Aortic balloon
              to our knowledge, regarding the efficacy or outcomes of   occlusion is effective in controlling pelvic hemorrhage. J Surg
              these patients, or details of the providers.          Res. 2012;177:341–347.
                                                                   9.  Brenner ML, Moore LJ, DuBose JJ, et al. A clinical series of
                                                                    resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for
              Technology  will  undoubtedly  help  push  REBOA  into   hemorrhage control and resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care
              the prehospital environment as lower-profile devices are   Surg. 2013;75:506–511.
              developed and are Food and Drug Administration ap-  10.  US Army Institute of Surgical Research. Joint Theater Trauma
              proved. The newest balloon catheter, and the only one   System Clinical Practice Guideline. Resuscitative endovascu-
                                                                    lar balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for hemorrhagic
              made specifically for REBOA, is now available and is   shock. 2014.
              compatible with a 7F sheath, making upsizing less dif-  11.  Borden Institute, Office of the Surgeon General. Emergency
              ficult than the sheaths initially available on the market   war surgery. 4th ed. Fort Sam Houston, TX: Office of the
              (11F–14F). However, regardless of how small the device   Surgeon General; 2013.
              and sheath become in the future, the ability to perform   12.  Brenner M, Hoehn M, Pasley J, et al. Basic endovascular
                                                                    skills for trauma course: bridging the gap between endovas-
              REBOA will be contingent on accessing the CFA rap-    cular techniques and the acute care surgeon. J Trauma Acute
              idly and correctly, and choosing the appropriate patient.   Care Surg. 2014;77:286–291.
              Along with the actual technique, these areas should be-
              come a focus of training.

                                                                 Dr Teeter is with the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Cen-
              Disclosures
                                                                 ter at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; and
              The authors have nothing to disclose.              University of North Carolina Department of Emergency Medi-
                                                                 cine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
                                                                 E-mail: WilliamTeeter@umm.edu.
              References
                                                                 Dr Romagnoli is a resident at the Walter Reed National Mili-
              1.  Kotwal RS, Butler FK, Gross KR, et al. Management of junc-
                tional hemorrhage in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: TCCC   tary Medical Center.
                Guidelines proposed change 13-03. J Spec Oper Med. 2013;
                13(4):85–93.                                     Dr Glaser is with the Naval Medical Research Unit, San An-
              2.  Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battle-  tonio, Texas.
                field (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casu-
                alty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:S431–437.  Mr Fisher is a first year medical student at the Texas A&M
              3.  Rasmussen TE, Baer DG, Doll BA, et al. In the ‘golden hour’:   College of Medicine.
                combat casualty care research drives innovation to improve
                survivability and reimagine future combat care. Army AL&T   Dr Pasley is with the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Cen-
                Magazine. 2015;January–March:80–85.
              4.  Midwinter MJ. Damage control surgery in the era of damage   ter at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
                control resuscitation. J R Army Med Corps. 2009;155:323–326.
              5.  Morrison JJ, Ross JD, Houston RT, et al. Use of resuscita-  Dr Scheele is with the Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center,
                tive endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a highly   Depart ment of Emergency Medicine, Toledo, Ohio.
                lethal model of noncompressible torso hemorrhage.  Shock.
                2014;41:130–137.                                 Dr Hoehn is with the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Cen-
              6.  Markov NP, Percival TJ, Morrison JJ, et al. Physiologic toler-  ter at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
                ance of descending thoracic aortic balloon occlusion in a swine
                model of hemorrhagic shock. Surgery. 2013;153:848–856.  Dr Brenner is with the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma
              7.  Scott DJ, Eliason JL, Villamaria C, et al. A novel fluoroscopy-  Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
                free, resuscitative endovascular aortic balloon occlusion system
                in a model of hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.
                2013;75:122–128.





















              Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta                                                                  21
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48