Page 115 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Summer 2015
P. 115

Table 3  Example of a Favorable Response to a Training Session Performed Once Weekly for 4 Weeks
                                                     Rate of        Recovery    Training Duration
               Week     Repetition   Heart Rate  Perceived Effort  Heart Rate        (min)        Training Load
                           1            150           7.0             135              5              35.0
                           2            155           7.5             145              3              22.5
                 1
                           3            157           8.0             150              1               8.0
                                                                                                    Total 65.5
                           1            150           7.0             120              5              35.0
                           2            155           7.0             130              3              21.0
                 2
                           3            155           7.5             135              1               7.5
                                                                                                    Total 63.5
                           1            145           6.0             120              5              30.0
                           2            150           7.0             125              3              21.0
                 3
                           3            155           7.5             130              1               7.5
                                                                                                    Total 58.5
                           1            140           6.0             115              5              30.0
                           2            145           6.5             120              3              19.5
                 4
                           3            150           7.0             120              1               7.0
                                                                                                    Total 56.5


              performance. Negative changes in training measures are   understand how they are changed by training and other
              often accompanied by poor sleep and mood,  which may   factors such as nutrition and sleep, which significantly
                                                   26
              be the first sign of under recovery from work or training.  influence hormone levels. 29,30
              In conjunction with objective measures of internal load,
              subjective information determined from personal logs   Application of the Training Load Method
              or questionnaires can confirm what is identified through
              measures of HR and RPE.  Subjective measures, in-  Determining Total Training Load
                                      18
              cluding overall sense of recovery, muscle soreness from   Total training load is the sum of the overall physical and
              training, and quality of sleep, can be related to training   mental loads placed on the body by each component of
              load. Recovery scores, measures of muscle soreness, and   training. SOF typically train many skills for their mis-
              sleep quality (Table 4) can be combined with measures   sions, much like a modern pentathlete, triathlete, or com-
              of internal and external load to understand “accumu-  bative athlete (e.g., wrestling, taekwondo). The training
              lated fatigue” and whether the body is adapting to the   load for each individual skill should be determined in-
              total stress placed on it.                         dividually and then summed by day, week, month, and
                                                                 training cycle to provide a full picture of how the total
              Measures of hormones are considered advanced mea-  and individual training loads are performed during the
              sures of internal load that can be unbalanced when the   training cycle. Monitoring each skill or aspect of train-
              training load is sustained without recovery.  During   ing individually is necessary to ensure the training load
                                                     27
                periods of high training stress, hormones such as testos-  is not too high when attempting to improve a key skill
              terone can decrease and, as a result, the body’s ability to   or fitness component related to Operator performance.
              recover is reduced; conversely, when the training load   Examples of calculating the total training load by day
              has been applied appropriately, it has been shown that   for each skill and by day and week for total training
              testosterone levels increase for SOF.  Monitoring hor-  load can be seen in Figures 1, 2, and 3.
                                             28
              monal changes in relationship to training can assist SOF
              in determining the “ideal” dose of training, which will   Periodization of Training Load
              help promote career longevity for the Operator through   to Improve Physical Performance
              improving the ability to balance work stress, physical   Monitoring the training load can measure training prog-
              training,  and  the  high operational tempo  maintained   ress, intensity of training, and most importantly can
              by SOF personnel. Benefits from measuring changes in   help design training to improve a skill within a specific
              hormones require measurements to be done regularly to   time frame and not cause the performance of other skills



              Monitoring Training for Human Performance Optimization                                         105
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120