Page 117 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Summer 2015
P. 117

Figure 3  Training load by individual training events. Total   training that can be performed and better understand
              load is calculated by heart rate (HR) and minutes spent in   how this is impacting on physical fitness.
              each respective training event over the week.
                                                                 Importantly, the Operator can use total and individual
                                                                 training loads to assist with “return to training” after a
                                                                 lack of a regular training plan, which may occur with
                                                                 prolonged deployments or injury. During these times,
                                                                 aerobic fitness and overall strength can significantly de-
                                                                 crease and need to slowly be rebuilt in a manner that
                                                                 supports the safest, yet quickest, return to duty. For
                                                                 instance, the cardiovascular system (heart and lungs)
                                                                 experiences significant detraining in less than 2 weeks,
                                                                 whereas muscle strength and power are preserved  for
                                                                 longer periods of time.  Given that cardiovascular fit-
                                                                                     32
                                                                 ness is the foundation for physical fitness, reestablishing
                                                                 the training load for aerobic fitness could be periodized
                                                                 (e.g., prioritized) to occur first, followed by a training
                                                                 load for strength and power development and then mili-
                                                                 tary specific performance.

                                                                 Conclusion

                                                                 Quantifying training can allow Operators to enhance
              bike and run loads, they must be multiplied by an event   their physical and mental resiliency through minimiz-
              rate (swimming = 0.75, biking = 0.50, and running =   ing fatigue, objectively evaluating and improving physi-
              1.0).  Note: The times for the events are for running but   cal fitness, and targeting time frames to enhance specific
                  2
              have been made equal for swimming and biking to show   mission relevant performance goals. Given how complex
              how each form of conditioning is different. 2      the nature of an Operator’s training is due to the multiple
                                                                 skills they must train, a scientific approach to quantify-
              Training Load for Maintenance and Retraining       ing training is necessary for managing stress and ensur-
              Knowing the maximal training load that can be tolerated   ing optimal mission readiness. Although the benefits of
              by the body and how each form of training stress influ-  quantifying training load have not yet been performed
              ences the maximum load can assist SOF in maintain-  for Operators, it has shown significant success with ath-
              ing physical fitness during deployment and key periods   letes. Units or individual SOF personnel are encouraged
              where retraining must occur due to the absence of regular   to seek the guidance of individuals with advanced knowl-
              training. For instance, reductions in training time most   edge of physical training to develop the best practices
              frequently come under stressful periods of deployment;   for quantifying and monitoring training, in order to help
              however, during these times, internal load (e.g., mental   minimize the potential for injury, improve career lon-
              stress) also becomes elevated. The  Operator should use   gevity and achieve performance goals while at the same
              the increase in internal load as a signal to decrease total   time maintain optimal health and well-being. Individu-
              training volume to offset the increase in mental stress.   als qualified to assist Operators and their teams should
              In addition, when regular training routines may not be   possess coaching experience and demonstrated success
              possible—due to mission environment—SOF can use a   using the training load concept to improve physical per-
              measure of internal load, such as RPE, to quantify the   formance and overall stress management. Additional


              Table 5  Training Equivalents Prescribed Using External vs. Internal Load at 83% of Performance
                                                     Running Training
                                     Internal Load     Load (RTL)      Swimming Training Load   Cycling Training Load
              External Load (Speed)*    (RPE)          (RPE ✕ min)          (RTL ✕ 0.75)          (RTL ✕ 0.5)
                                               Recovery between intervals is 60 seconds
              10✕200m in 43 seconds   RPE 7–8         7.5 ✕ 0.72 = 5.4     5.4 ✕ 0.75 = 4.0      5.4 ✕ 0.5 = 2.7
              10✕300m in 71 seconds   RPE 7–8         7.5 ✕ 1.18 = 8.9      8.9 ✕ .75 = 6.7      8.9 ✕ 0.5 = 4.5
              10✕400m in 104 seconds  RPE 7–8         7.5 ✕ 1.73 = 13       13 ✕ .75 = 9.8       13 ✕ 0.5 = 6.5
              Note: *Speed is for running distance, not for swimming or cycling, but is provided for context and comparative purposes.



              Monitoring Training for Human Performance Optimization                                         107
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122