Page 87 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2015
P. 87

remains the ideal training pathway. Until that training     9.  Hile DC, Morgan AR, Laselle BT, et al. Is point­of­care ul­
              pathway is fully established to include training for pre­  trasound accurate and useful in the hands of military medical
              viously graduated medics and training for SOM not at­  technicians? A review of the literature. Mil Med. 2012;177:
                                                                    983–987.
              tending JSOMTC, much of this training will rely on the   10.  Polk JD, Fallon WF. The use of focused assessment with so­
              individual medical units and a training and sustainment   nography for trauma (FAST) by a prehospital air medical
              standard should be addressed.                         team in the trauma arrest patient. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000;
                                                                    4(1):82–84.
              POCUS is working its way onto the front lines of today’s   11.  Paydar S, Rouhezamin MR, Mousavi M, et al. On­scene
                                                                    echocardiography and focused assessment with sonography
              battlefield. Initially in the hands of physicians, it has   for trauma (FAST), screening modalities to limit early pre­
              proven its value in triage, diagnosis, and treatment. Now   hospital thoracotomy, means to reduce the expenditure of
              it has extended to the prehospital/field setting and most   resources. J Trauma. 2011;71(4):1096.
              military branches are providing their SOM access to the   12.  Byhahn C, Bingold TM, Zwissler B, et al. Prehospital ultra­
              machines for use. It is the job of the senior medical leader­  sound detects pericardial tamponade in a pregnant victim of
                                                                    stabbing assault. Resuscitation. 2008;76:146–148.
              ship to provide our operators with the tools and training   13.  Hoyer HX, Vogl S, Schiemann U, et al. Prehospital ultrasound
              to help them accomplish their mission. It is with this in   in emergency medicine: incidence, feasibility, indications and
              mind that we hope you find this article a useful starting   diagnoses. Eur J Emerg Med. 2010;17(5):254–259.
              point for preparing your SOM for the next conflict.  14.  Backlund BH, Bonnett CJ, Faragher JP, et al. Pilot study to
                                                                    determine the feasibility of training Army National Guard
                                                                    medics to perform focused cardiac ultrasonography. Prehosp
              Funding                                               Emerg Care. 2010;14(1):118–123.
                                                                 15.  Jorgensen H, Jensen CH, Dirks J. Does prehospital ultra­
              The authors report no funding was received with respect   sound improve treatment of the trauma patient? A systematic
              to this article.                                      review. Eur J Emerg Med. 2010;17(5):249–253.
                                                                 16.  American College of Emergency Physicians. Policy statement:
                                                                    emergency ultrasound. 2008. http://www.acep.org/Clinical
              Disclaimer                                            ­­­Practice­Management/Ultrasound.
                                                                 17.  Iverson K, Haritos D, Thomas R, et al. The effect of bed­
              The views expressed in this article are those of the au­  side ultrasound on diagnosis and management of soft tissue
              thors and do not reflect the official policy or position of   infections in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(8):
                                                                    1347–1351.
              the Department of the US Navy, Department of Defense,   18.  Freeman KM, Trank TV, Sherman SS. A descriptive analysis
              or the US government.                                 of medical encounters aboard 15 Navy surface ships home­
                                                                    ported in San Diego. San Diego, CA: Naval Health Research
                                                                    Center San Diego CA, 2002.
              Disclosures                                        19.  Warman P, Nicholls B. Ultrasound­guided nerve blocks: effi­
              The authors have no financial or other disclosures.   cacy and safety. Best Prac Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23(3):
                                                                    313–326.
                                                                 20.  Herring A, Nagdev A, Durant A, et al. Cadaveric models for
              References                                            training emergency medicine residents in ultrasound­guided
                                                                    peripheral nerve blocks. Presented at the 2010 Innovations in
              1.  Pian L, Gillman LM, McBeth PB, et al. Potential use of remote   Emergency Medicine Education, Phoenix, AZ; 2010.
                telesonography as a transformational technology in underre­  21.  Tayal VS, Neulander M, Norton HJ, et al. Emergency depart­
                sourced and/or remote settings.  Emerg Med Int. 2013;2013:   ment sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diame­
                986160.                                             ter to detect findings of increased intracranial pressure in adult
              2.  Whelan L, Justice W, Goodloe JM, et al. Trauma ultrasound in   head injury patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(4):508–514.
                civilian tactical medicine. Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012:781570.  22.  Nolting L, Hunt P, Cook T. Ultrasound­guided foreign body
              3.  Nelson BP, Chason K. Use of ultrasound by emergency medical   simulation: a novel use of Spam. Presented at the 2011 Innova­
                services: a review. Int J Emerg Med. 2008;1:253–259.  tions in Emergency Medicine Education, Boston, MA; 2011.
              4.  Blaivas M, Kuhn W, Reynolds B, et al. Change in differential   23.  Salmon M, Kwan E. A simple model for teaching ultrasound
                diagnosis and patient management with the use of portable ul­  guided nerve block technique. Presented at the 2010 Innova­
                trasound in a remote setting. Wilderness Environ Med. 2005;   tions in Emergency Medicine Education, Phoenix, AZ; 2010.
                16:38–41.                                        24.  Johanson K, Wall CT, Kwon M. Birds and balloons: a novel
              5.  Blazier SJ, Leach RA, Perez G, et al. Running a local national   simulation model for ultrasound­guided central venous cath­
                medical clinic for Special Forces/Special Operations medical   eterization. Presented at the 2011 Innovations in Emergency
                personnel. J Spec Oper Med. 2007;7(1): 51–57.       Medicine Education, Boston, MA; 2011.
              6.  Morgan AR, Vasios WN, Hubler DA, et al. Special operator   25.  Heiner JD, Baker BL, McArthur TJ. The ultrasound detection
                level clinical ultrasound: an experience in application and train­  of simulated long bone fractures by U.S. Army Special Forces
                ing. J Spec Oper Med. 2010;10(2):16–21.             medics. J Spec Oper Med. 2010;10(2):7–10.
              7.  Keenan S, Morgan AR, Blankenship R, et al. Ultrasound in   26.  Heiner JD, McArthur TJ. A simulation model of the ultra­
                Special Operations medicine: a proposal for application and   sound diagnosis of long­bone fractures. Simul Healthc. 2009;
                training. J Spec Oper Med. 2008;8(4):47–54.         4(4):228–231.
              8.  Vasios WN. Fracture detection in a combat theater: four cases   27.  Nomura JT. Web­based asynchronous e­learning emergency
                comparing ultrasound to conventional radiography.  J Spec   ultrasound education. Presented at the 2011 Innovations in
                Oper Med. 2010;10(2):11–15.                         Emergency Medicine Education, Boston, MA; 2011.



              Operational Point-of-Care Ultrasound Review                                                     77
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92