Page 38 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2014
P. 38

ReSTART:
                         A Novel Framework for Resource-Based Triage

                                          in Mass-Casualty Events



                             Alex F. Mills, PhD; Nilay T. Argon, PhD; Serhan Ziya, PhD;
                                  Brian Hiestand, MD, MPH; James Winslow, MD





          ABSTRACT
          Objective: Current guidelines for mass-casualty triage   Further   validation is required before field implemen-
          do not explicitly use information about resource avail-  tation; however, the framework proposed in here can
          ability. Even though this limitation has been widely   serve as the foundation for future work in this area.
          recognized, how it should be addressed remains largely
          unexplored. The authors present a novel framework de-  Keywords: triage, mass-casualty event, prioritization
          veloped using operations research methods to account
          for resource limitations when determining priorities for
          transportation of critically injured patients. To illustrate
          how this framework can be used, they also develop two   Introduction
          specific example methods, named ReSTART and Sim-   There is very little existing research to validate the reli-
          ple-ReSTART, both of which extend the widely adopted   ability and effectiveness of triage systems and algorithms
          triage protocol Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment   currently in use. In a mass-casualty situation, triage is
                                                                           1
          (START) by using a simple calculation to determine pri-  required to maximize the delivery of limited resources so
          orities based on the relative scarcity of transportation   as to benefit injured patients to the greatest extent pos-
          resources.  Methods: The framework is supported by   sible. For example, within the START triage guidelines,
          three techniques from operations research: mathemati-  patients are classified as expectant (not expected to sur-
          cal analysis, optimization, and discrete-event simulation.   vive injuries given severity or care available), immediate
          The authors’ algorithms were developed using mathe-  (survivable injuries but requires definitive medical treat-
          matical analysis and optimization and then extensively   ment within 1 hour to survive), delayed (potentially seri-
          tested using 9,000 discrete-event simulations on three   ous but not expected to deteriorate over the next several
          distributions of patient severity (representing low, ran-  hours), and minor.  In the START framework, all im-
                                                                              2
          dom, and high acuity). For each incident, the expected   mediate patients in a mass-casualty incident should be
          number  of  survivors  was  calculated  under  START,   transported before delayed patients, regardless of the
            ReSTART, and Simple-ReSTART. A web-based decision   resource availability. Previous authors have suggested,
          support tool was constructed to help providers make pri-  however, that there is potential to improve outcomes
          oritization decisions in the aftermath of mass- casualty   if prioritization decisions explicitly account for the re-
          incidents based on ReSTART.  Results: In simulations,   source limitations that may arise in various stages of the
          ReSTART resulted in significantly lower mortality than   response effort. 1-5  Research to date has not addressed
          START regardless of which severity distribution was   whether there is evidence to support this claim or how
          used (paired t test, p < .01). Mean decrease in critical   existing triage protocols such as START could be ex-
          mortality, the percentage of immediate and delayed pa-  tended in a way that takes into account resource limi-
          tients  who  die,  was  8.5%  for  low-acuity  distribution   tations. Despite the fact that one of the core concepts
          (range –2.2% to 21.1%), 9.3% for random distribution   of mass-casualty triage is that triage systems should be
          (range –0.2% to 21.2%), and 9.1% for high-acuity dis-  resource dependent,  existing triage guidelines fail to de-
                                                                              3
          tribution (range –0.7% to 21.1%). Although the critical   scribe how “the decision of whom to treat and/or trans-
          mortality improvement due to ReSTART was different   port first and how best to use the resources on hand,”
          for each of the three severity distributions, the varia-  should be made.  Currently, there is no guideline or
                                                                            2
          tion was less than 1 percentage point, indicating that the   rule-of-thumb to help emergency responders make such
            ReSTART policy is relatively robust to different severity   decisions based on resource limitations. To fill this gap,
          distributions. Conclusions: Taking resource limitations   we report the findings of a research project that uses op-
          into account in mass-casualty situations, triage has the   erations research methodologies including mathematical
          potential to increase the expected number of survivors.   analysis, optimization, and discrete-event simulation.



                                                          30
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43