Page 66 - JSOM Fall 2025
P. 66

The present study was limited by the measures. Blood volume   performed poorly throughout and cannot be recommended as
          was inferred from the weight (mass) of the bag and blood us-  presently taught within Valkyrie. PC and OG conferred mixed
          ing a digital scale, which is unlikely to be available in a combat   results, with OG largely superior to BC and PC. Combined,
          environment. Time to fill (i.e., rate of fill) was not a measured   present findings highlight the importance of studying tech-
          variable.                                          niques to determine accurate donor blood bag fills towards
                                                             preserving  the  life of  the traumatically  hemorrhaging  warf-
          The present study was limited by the design. While employing   ighter. Finally, we do recommend that the JTS validate whether
          a true experimental randomized within-subjects design was a   the ±10% tolerance for WBB is clinically appropriate for WBB
          study strength, each participant was measured only once, so it   operations or establish an appropriate tolerance standard to
          was not feasible to determine the stability of findings over time   facilitate targeted training feedback and quality control.
          or the impact of practice repetitions on the relative efficacy of
          BC, PC, and OG.                                    Acknowledgments
                                                             The Authors wholeheartedly thank the Corpsmen of the 1st
          Areas for Future Research                          Marine Division, Navy Education and  Training Office, for
          The present study should be replicated with larger, more di-  their support during this study and for their dedication to ex-
          verse samples, including SOF medics and Corpsmen/medics   cellence in combat resuscitation.
          across service branches.  The present study should be repli-
          cated in challenging, battlefield-relevant environments, such   Author Contributions
          as wind, simulated casualty collection points (e.g., fighting   JA, DC, GJZ, and SW designed the study. DC submitted QI/PI
          holes, bunkers), and low-light conditions with tactical light-  protocol approval. DC, CJ, KM, BD, and SW developed study
          ing, night-vision goggles, and night-vision goggles with focus-  procedures and executed data collection. Data were reviewed
          ing adaptors. 19                                   by all authors. GJZ conducted statistical analyses. MC drafted
                                                             the initial manuscript. All authors made contributions to the
          It is important to measure the fill rate differences between BC,   final manuscript.
          PC, and OG. Study participants reported perceptions that BC
          fill rates slowed as the bag filled (suspected due to increasing re-  Disclaimer
          striction-induced pressure within the donor bag). This is an em-  The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and
          pirical question that can be answered by measuring flow rates   do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the
          during bag fills using a similar method to that of Wier et al. 17  Department of the Navy, the Department of Defense, or the
                                                             United States Government.
          The relative impact of underfilled versus overfilled donor blood
          bags on patient outcomes remains unclear. It is therefore cru-  Disclosures
          cial to accurately determine the relationships between blood-  All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
          to-citrate ratios and the physiological impact on the blood
          recipient. We modeled our 450mL ±10% target on Meledeo et   Funding
          al., who followed the procedures of the Armed Services Blood   This work was supported by a Naval Medical Center San Diego
          Program. The origin of this standard is unclear. FDA guidelines   (NMCSD) Clinical Investigation Department Grant ($10,000).
          and AABB Technical Manual justify the ±10% standard in the
          context of quality control for fractionation blood products   References
          from whole blood (e.g., PRBCS, Platelets), not in the context   1.  Eastridge BJ, Holcomb JB, Shackelford S. Outcomes of traumatic
          of citrate effects (or RBC survivability, etc.). While the JTS de-  hemorrhagic shock and the epidemiology of preventable death
          scribes a target of 450mL for blood volume (585g with bag   from injury.  Transfusion. 2019;59(S2):1423–1428. doi:10.1111/
                                                               trf.15161
          weight), they do not specify an acceptable range. Empirically   2.  Murdock  AD, Berséus O, Hervig  T, Strandenes G, Lunde  TH.
          determining safety tolerances above and below the 450mL   Whole blood: the future of traumatic hemorrhagic shock re-
          target may prove fruitful towards fostering safe blood trans-  suscitation.  Shock. 2014;41(Suppl 1):62–69. doi:10.1097/SHK.
          fusions in WBB scenarios. As a first step towards this goal,   0000000000000134
          our laboratory is presently  conducting a study to measure   3.  Nessen SC, Eastridge BJ, Cronk D, et al. Fresh whole blood use by
          ionized  calcium  before  donation  and  following  autologous   forward surgical teams in Afghanistan is associated with improved
          transfusion, then correlating the relationships between blood-  survival compared to component therapy without platelets. Trans-
                                                               fusion. 2013;53(Suppl 1):107S–13S. doi:10.1111/trf.12044
          to- citrate ratios and ionized calcium concentrations.  4.  Gurney JM, Spinella PC. Blood transfusion management in the se-
                                                               verely bleeding military patient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31
          Lastly,  given  the  relatively  poor  overall  performance  of  BC,   (2):207–214. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000574
          PC, and OG, it is clear that there is room for improvement in   5.  Gurney JM, Staudt AM, Del Junco DJ, et al. Whole blood at the tip
          determining an optimal technique. For example, weighing the   of the spear: a retrospective cohort analysis of warm fresh whole
          blood bag using a spring scale (also known as a fisherman’s   blood resuscitation versus component therapy in severely injured
                                                               combat casualties. Surgery. 2022;171(2):518–525. doi:10.1016/j.
          scale) or marking the blood bag with a fluorescent stripe that   surg.2021.05.051
          indicates a 450mL fill line may prove fruitful in fostering ac-  6.  Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl JG, Beekley  AC, Holcomb
          curate blood bag fills in WBB scenarios.             JG.  Warm fresh whole blood is independently associated with
                                                               improved survival for patients with combat-related traumatic
                                                               injuries.  J Trauma. 2009;66(4 Suppl):S69–S76. doi:10.1097/TA.
          Conclusion                                           0b013e31819d85fb
                                                             7.  Spinella PC, Reddy HL, Jaffe JS, Cap  AP, Goodrich RP. Fresh
          The present study of Valkyrie program novices and experts   whole blood use for hemorrhagic shock: preserving benefit while
          found high rates of failure in accurately filling blood bags to   avoiding complications.  Anesth Analg. 2012;115(4):751–758.
          the 450mL ±10% target using BC, PC, and OG techniques. BC   doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318261f40e

          64  |  JSOM   Volume 25, Edition 3 / Fall 2025
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71