Page 68 - JSOM Fall 2024
P. 68

translation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(3):594–599. doi:   28.  McKee CH, Heffernan RW, Willenbring BD, et al. Comparing the
             10.1097/TA.0000000000000561                        accuracy of mass casualty triage systems when used in an adult
          11.  Service Médical du RAID. Tactical emergency medicine: Lessons   population. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020;24(4):515–524. doi:10.1
             from Paris marauding terrorist attack. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):37.   080/10903127.2019.1641579
             doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1202-z                   29.  Heffernan RW, Lerner EB, McKee CH, et al. Comparing the ac-
          12.  Hirsch M, Carli P, Nizard R, et al. The medical response to multi-  curacy of mass casualty triage systems in a pediatric population.
             site terrorist attacks in Paris.  Lancet. 2015;386(10012):2535–  Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019;23(3):304–308. doi:10.1080/109031
             2538. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01063-6            27.2018.1520946
          13.  Bobko JP, Sinha M, Chen D, et al. A tactical medicine after- action   30.  Ryan K, George D, Liu J, Mitchell P, Nelson K, Kue R. The use
             report of the San Bernardino terrorist incident.  West J Emerg   of field triage in Disaster and mass casualty incidents: A survey
             Med. 2018;19(2):287–293. doi:10.5811/westjem.2017.10.31374  of current practices by EMS personnel.  Prehosp Emerg Care.
          14.  Stralen DV, McKay SD, Williams GT, Mercer TA.  Tactical im-  2018;22(4):520–526. doi:10.1080/10903127.2017.1419323
             provisation:  After-action/comprehensive analysis of the active   31.  Vayer JS,  Ten Eyck RP, Cowan ML. New concepts in triage.
             shooter incident response by the San Bernardino City Fire De-  Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(8):927–930. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644
             partment, December 2, 2015. San Bernardino Fire Protection Dis-  (86)80677-1
             trict; 2018. https://www.elementrescue.com/SBAAR_Final_.pdf  32.  Horne S, Nutbeam T. You can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s
          15.  Crews C, Heightman AJ. City on Alert. Lessons learned from the   ear: Time to start again with MCI triage. Prehosp Disaster Med.
             San Bernardino terrorist attack. JEMS. 2016;41(8):26–31.  2016;31(4):459–460. doi:10.1017/S1049023X16000406
          16.  U.S. Health and Human Services  Assistant Secretary for Pre-  33.  Kamler JK, Taube S, Koch EJ, et al. Effectiveness of and adher-
             paredness and Response. Healthcare Response  to a No-Notice   ence to triage algorithms during prehospital response to mass
             Incident: Las Vegas webinar. March 28, 2018. Accessed July 17,   casualty incidents.  J Spec Oper  Med. 2023.23(1):60–67. doi:
             2022.  https://files.asprtracie.hhs.gov/documents/aspr-tracie-no-   10.55460/73Y0-FSLB
             notice-incident-las-vegas-webinar-ppt-508.pdf   34.  Shackelford SA, Remley MA, Keenan S, et al. Evidence-based
          17.  Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1 October After-Action   principles of time, triage and treatment: Refining the initial
             Report; 2018:61. Accessed November 14, 2022. https://www.hsdl   medical response to massive casualty incidents. J Trauma Acute
             .org/?view&did=814668                              Care Surg. 2022;93(2S Suppl 1):S160–S164. doi:10.1097/TA.
          18.  Klein KR, Burkle FM Jr, Swienton R, King RV, Lehman T, North   0000000000003699
             CS. Qualitative analysis of surveyed emergency responders and   35.  Thompson SN,  Wilson ZW, Cole CB, Kennedy  AR,  Aycock
             the identified factors that affect first stage of primary triage de-  RD. Case report: Mass casualty lightning strike at ranger train-
             cision-making  of  mass  casualty  incidents.  PLoS  Curr.  2016;8.   ing camp.  Mil Med. 2017;182(5):e1803–e1806. doi:10.7205/
             doi:10.1371/currents.dis.d69dafcfb3ad8be88b3e655bd38fba84  MILMED-D-16-00229
          19.  National  Association  of  Emergency  Medical  Technicians  19.   36.  Wild J, Maher J, Frazee RC, et al.  The Fort Hood Massacre:
             PHTLS: Prehospital Trauma Life Support. Military 8th ed. Jones   Lessons learned from a high profile mass casualty.  J Trauma
             & Bartlett Learning; 2014.                         Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1709–1713. doi:10.1097/TA.
          20.  Hick JL, Chipman J, Loppnow G, et al. Hospital response to a   0b013e318250cd10
             major freeway bridge collapse. Disaster Med Public Health Prep.   37.  Jankosky CJ. Mass casualty in an isolated environment: Medical
             2008;2 Suppl 1:S11–S16. doi:10.1097/DMP.0b013e31817196bf  response to a submarine collision.  Mil Med. 2008;173(8):734–
          21.  Melmer P, Carlin M, Castater CA, et al. Mass casualty shootings   737. doi:10.7205/milmed.173.8.734
             and emergency preparedness: A multidisciplinary approach for an   38.  Hayashi K, Bailey R, Moser C, Potter B. Attack on the Cole: med-
             unpredictable event. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:1013–1021.   ical lessons learned. Proceedings. Accessed November 21, 2022.
             doi:10.2147/JMDH.S219021                           2002;128/7/1,193.  https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/
          22.  Callaway DW. A review of the landscape: Challenges and gaps in   2002/july/attack-cole-medical-lessons-learned
             trauma response to civilian high threat mass casualty incidents.   39.  Glassberg E, Lipsky AM, Abramovich A, Sergeev I, Hochman O,
             J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(6S):S21–S27. doi:10.1097/  Ash N. A dynamic mass casualty incident at sea: Lessons learned
             TA.0000000000001811                                from the Mavi Marmara.  J Trauma Acute  Care  Surg. 2013;75
          23.  Turner CDA, Lockey DJ, Rehn M. Pre-hospital management of   (2):292–297. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318294662d
             mass casualty civilian shootings: A systematic literature review.   40.  Schauer SG, April MD, Simon E, Maddry JK, Carter R, Delo-
             Crit Care. 2016;20(1):362. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1543-7  renzo RA. Prehospital interventions during mass-casualty events
          24.  Sacco WJ, Navin DM, Fiedler KE, Waddell RK II, Long WB, Buck-  in Afghanistan: A case analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32
             man RF Jr. Precise formulation and evidence-based application of   (4):465–468. doi:10.1017/S1049023X17006422
             resource-constrained triage. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(8):759–  41.  Vassallo J, Horne S, Smith JE. Triage and the Modified Physiologi-
             770. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.003                 cal Triage Tool-24 (MPTT-24). BMJ Mil Health. 2020;166(1):33–
          25.  Lerner EB, Schwartz RB, Coule PL, et al. Mass casualty triage: An   36. doi:10.1136/jramc-2017-000878
             evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national   42.  North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Medical aspects in the man-
             guideline. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2 Suppl 1:S25–  agement of a major incident/mass casualty situation. 2021. Ac-
             S34. doi:10.1097/DMP.0b013e318182194e              cessed  February  25,  2023.  https://www.coemed.org/files/stanags/
          26.  Garner A, Lee A, Harrison K, Schultz CH. Comparative analysis   03_AMEDP/AMedP-1.10_EDB_V1_E_2879.pdf
             of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms. Ann Emerg Med.
             2001;38(5):541–548. doi:10.1067/mem.2001.119053  PMID: 39172917; DOI: 10.55460/0GO5-QW03
          27.  Cross KP, Cicero MX. Head-to-head comparison of disaster tri-
             age methods in pediatric, adult, and geriatric patients. Ann Emerg
             Med. 2013;61(6):668–676.e7. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.
             12.023














          66  |  JSOM   Volume 24, Edition 3 / Fall 2024
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73