Page 63 - JSOM Fall 2024
P. 63

14.  van der Bent SAS, Rauwerdink D, Oyen EMM, Maijer KI, Rust-  30.  Lin C, Marquardt Y, Rütten S, et al. Macrophage-like rapid up-
                 emeyer T, Wolkerstorfer A. Complications of tattoos and per-  take and toxicity of tattoo ink in human monocytes. Immunol-
                 manent makeup: overview and analysis of 308 cases. J Cosmet   ogy. 2024;171(3):388–401. doi:10.1111/imm.13714
                 Dermatol. 2021;20(11):3630–3641. doi:10.1111/jocd.14498  31.  Kluger N. Tattoo-associated uveitis with or without systemic sar-
              15.  Serup J, Hutton Carlsen K, Dommershausen N, et al. Identi-  coidosis: a comparative review of the literature. J Eur Acad Der-
                 fication of pigments related to allergic tattoo reactions in 104   matol Venereol. 2018;32(11):1852–1861. doi:10.1111/jdv.15070
                 human skin biopsies.  Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82(2):73–82.   32.  Bose R, Sibley C, Fahim S. Granulomatous and systemic inflam-
                 doi:10.1111/cod.13423                              matory  reactions  from  tattoo  ink:  case  report  and  concise  re-
              16.  Serup J, Sepehri M, Hutton Carlsen K. Classification of tattoo   view. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2020;8:2050313X20936036.
                 complications in a hospital material of 493 adverse events. Der-  doi:10.1177/2050313X20936036
                 matology. 2016;232(6):668–678. doi:10.1159/000452148  33.  Cunningham E, Dunn JP, Smit DP, Zierhut M. Tattoo-sssociated
              17.  Hutton Carlsen K, Serup J.  Chronic tattoo reactions cause re-  uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2021;29(5):835–837. doi:10.10
                 duced quality of life equaling cumbersome skin diseases.  Curr   80/09273948.2021.2006517
                 Probl Dermatol. 2015:48:71–75. doi:10.1159/000369644  34.  Juhas E, English JC 3rd. Tattoo-associated complications. J Pe-
              18.  Serup J, Hutton Carlsen K. Patch test study of 90 patients with   diatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26(2):125–129. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.
                 tattoo reactions: negative outcome of allergy patch test to baseline   2012.08.005
                 batteries and culprit inks suggests allergen(s) are generated in the   35.  Abudu B, Erickson CP, Calame A, Cohen PR. Basal cell carci-
                 skin through haptenization.  Contact Dermatitis. 2014;71:255–  noma originating in a tattoo: case report and review of an uncom-
                 263. doi:10.1111/cod.12271                         mon complication in tattoo recipients. Dermatol Pract Concept.
              19.  Schubert S, Kluger N, Schreiver I. Hypersensitivity  to perma-  2019;9(4):265–270. doi:10.5826/dpc.0904a03
                 nent tattoos: Literature summary and comprehensive review of   36.  Lorei NC, Lucas  MJ, Logemann NF. Tattoo-induced  hemangi-
                 patch tested tattoo patients 1997–2022.  Contact Dermatitis.   oma: An exploration of the potential for vascular proliferations
                 2023;88(5):331–350. doi:10.1111/cod.14291          following tattoo-related trauma. J Cutan Pathol. 2018;45(9):721–
              20.  De Cuyper C. Complications of cosmetic tattoos. Curr Probl Der-  724. doi: 10.1111/cup.13303.
                 matol. 2015:48:61–70. doi:10.1159/000369188     37.  Baker PA, O’Dowd GJ, Khan IU. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuber-
              21.  Sepehri M, Jørgensen B, Serup J. Introduction of dermatome   ans arising in a decorative tattoo. Sarcoma. 2005;9(1-2):37–41.
                 shaving as first line treatment of chronic tattoo reactions. J Der-  38.  Monfrecola G, Fornaro L, Ascierto PA, et al. Could wide tattoo
                 matolog Treat. 2015;26(5):451–455. doi:10.3109/09546634.201  delay the early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma? J Eur Acad Der-
                 4.999021                                           matol Venereol. 2023;37(9):e1117–e1118. doi:10.1111/jdv.19037
              22.  Chaisrimaneepan N, Khoruamklang  T, Manupeerapun H.  Pit-  39.  Kluger N, Koljonen V. Tattoos, inks, and cancer. Lancet Oncol.
                 falls in laser-based device tattoo removal: a literature review.   2012;13(4):e161–e168. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70340-0
                 Skin The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine. 2024;8(2):1384–1395.   40.  Nielsen  C,  Jerkeman  M,  Saxne  Jöud  A.  Tattoos  as  a  risk  fac-
                 doi:10.25251/skin.8.2.4                            tor for malignant lymphoma: a population-based case–control
              23.  Eklund Y, Rubin AT. Laser tattoo removal, precautions, and un-  study. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;72:102649. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.
                 wanted effects. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2015;48:88–96. doi:10.1159/   2024.102649
                 000369191                                       41.  Carlsen Hutton K, Sepehri M, Serup J. Tattooist-associated tat-
              24.  Szulia A, Antoszewski B, Zawadzki T, Kasielska-Trojan A. When   too complications: “overworked tattoo,” “pigment overload” and
                 body art goes awry—severe systemic allergic reaction to red ink   infections producing early and late adverse events. Dermatology.
                 tattoo requiring surgical treatment. Int J Environ Res Public   2020;236(3):208–215. doi: 10.1159/000501962
                 Health. 2022;19(17):10741. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710741  42.  Pazos MD, Hu Y, Elani Y, Browning KL, Jiang N, Yetisen AK.
              25.  Bäumler W. Chemical hazard of tattoo colorants.  Presse Med.   Tattoo inks for optical biosensing in interstitial fluid. Adv Healthc
                 2020;49(4):104046. doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2020.104046   Mater. 2021;10(21):e2101238. doi:10.1002/adhm.202101238
              26.  Sepehri M, Hutton Carlsen K, Serup J. Papulo-nodular reactions   43.  Dhond K, Hu Y, Yetisen AK. Dermal tattoo biosensors. Dermatol-
                 in black tattoos as markers of sarcoidosis: study of 92 tattoo reac-  ogie (Heidelb). 2023;74(10):819–821. doi:10.1007/s00105-023-
                 tions from a hospital material. Dermatology. 2016;232(6):679–  05195-6
                 686. doi:10.1159/000453315                      44.  Alsing KK, Johannesen HH, Hansen RH, Serup J. Tattoo com-
              27.  Kluger N. Sarcoidosis on tattoos: a review of the literature from   plications and magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive re-
                 1939 to 2011. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2013;30(2):   view of the literature. Acta Radiol. 2020;61(12):1695–1700. doi:
                 86–102.                                            10.1177/0284185120910427
              28.  van der Bent SAS, de Winter RW, Wolkerstorfer A, Rustemeyer   45.  Newell CF, Bridwell RE, Inman BL, Long B. Tattoo associated na-
                 T. Red tattoo reactions, a prospective cohort on clinical as-  tive valve infective endocarditis. Am J Emerg Med. 2022:60:227.
                 pects.  J  Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(10):e384–e386.   e5-227.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.022
                 doi:10.1111/jdv.15677                           46.  Dougherty KD, Koch JR. Religious tattoos at one Christian uni-
              29.  Arl M, Nogueira DJ, Schveitzer Köerich J, Mottim Justino N,   versity. Visual Studies. 2019;34(4):311–318. doi:10.1080/14725
                 Schulz Vicentini D, Gerson Matias W. Tattoo inks: Characteriza-  86X.2019.1687331
                 tion and in vivo and in vitro toxicological evaluation. J Hazard
                 Mater. 2019;364:548–561. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.072  PMID: 39243405; DOI: 10.55460/CC3F-YNW2





















                                                                         Tattoo Inks: Health Risks and Biokinetics Explored  |  61
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68