Page 100 - JSOM Fall 2023
P. 100
Field expedient care that may enable mobility currently relies Ft. Sam Houston, Tx, the U.S. Army Medical Department, the
on improvising solutions using materials available to the res- U.S. Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of
cuer and leveraging principles from prosthetic/orthotic designs. the Air Force, the Department of the Army, the DoD, or the
In short, location of long and rigid items (e.g., branches, tent U.S. Government.
poles, ski poles, etc.) that can transfer energy from the ground,
around the splinted fracture site, and to proximal anatomy References
that can support weight (e.g., anterior proximal tibia, ischial 1. Belmont PJ, Schoenfeld AJ, Goodman G. Epidemiology of combat
tuberosity of the pelvis, etc.) can be used to improvise mobility wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Free-
solutions in austere environments without placing additional dom: orthopaedic burden of disease. J Surg Orthop Advn. 2010;19
(1):2–7.
weight burden on the medical provider. There is little literature 2. Chandler H, MacLeod K, Penn-Barwell JG, et al. Extremity injuries
on best improvisation practice for such devices in the field or sustained by the UK military in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts:
how well they may stabilize a fracture and enable mobility. 2003–2014. Injury. 2017;48(7):1439–1443.
Therefore, caution should be used when implementing these 3. Dougherty AL, Mohrle CR, Galarneau MR, et al. Battlefield extremity
injuries in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Injury. 2009;40(7):772–777.
field-based treatments, while also recognizing and balancing 4. Owens BD, Kragh JF, Jr., Macaitis J, et al. Characterization of ex-
the priorities of threats to life vs. threats to limb when hos- tremity wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring
pital care will be delayed. To maximize the feasibility of such Freedom. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(4):254–257.
devices, consideration should be given to incorporation of 5. Travers S, Carfantan C, Luft A, et al. Five years of prolonged field
biomaterial interventions that may both internally stabilize a care: prehospital challenges during recent French military operations.
Transfusion. 2019;59(S2):1459–1466.
fracture and allow for antibacterial materials to be delivered 6. Akpoto YM, Abalo A, Adam S, et al. Extremity injuries in soldiers
to the injury site. While the development of these biomaterial during the conflict in Mali: Experience of Togo Level two Hospital.
interventions I still in its infancy, continued developments in Int Orthop. 2015;39(10):1895–1899.
and integration with exoskeletal technologies, both impro- 7. Army U.S. TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-1. The U.S. Army in Multi-
Domain Operations 2028. 6 December 2018. https://adminpubs.tradoc
vised and commercially available, will help address known ca- .army.mil/pamphlets/TP525-3-1.pdf. Accessed 18 September 2023.
pability gaps for operational readiness in PCC scenarios. 8. Keenan S, Riesberg JC. Prolonged field care: beyond the “golden
hour”. Wild Environ Med. 2017;28(2):S135–S139.
Acknowledgements 9. Karlberg EJ, Cook CBC. Strategic training management: Training to win
The authors gratefully acknowledge COL Johnny Paul and in a complex world. U.S. Army War College; 2016. https://publications
.armywarcollege.edu/publication/strategic-training-management-
MAJ Robert Blume of the U.S. Army Combat Medic Support training-to-win-in-a-complex-world/. Accessed 18 September 2023.
Training Program, Chief Shane Reddout of Bexar County 10. Keenan S. Deconstructing the definition of Prolonged Field Care. J
Emergency Services District No. 8, Ft. Sam Houston, Tx, and Spec Oper Med. 2015;15(4):125.
the staff of the U.S. Army Medical Department Museum, Ft. 11. Mucciarone JJ, Llewellyn CH, Wightman JM. Tactical combat casu-
alty care in the assault on Punta Paitilla Airfield. Mil Med. 2006;171
Sam Houston, Tx for providing examples of historical and (8):687–690.
modern splints for us to photograph; Erica Vasquez of Brooke 12. Dean C. The modern warrior’s combat load. Dismounted operations
Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, Tx for illustrating in Afghanistan, April-May 2003. 2004. https://alamancerangers.files
the fracture orthoses; and Noel Guerrero and Tyler Cagle in .wordpress.com/2012/01/modernwarriorscombatloadreport.pdf. Ac-
cessed 18 September 2023.
the Military Performance Laboratory at the Center for the In- 13. DeSoucy E, Shackelford S, DuBose JJ, et al. Review of 54 Cases of
trepid, Brooke Army Medical Center for preparing the figures Prolonged Field Care. J Spec Oper Med.17(1):121–129.
for print. 14. Soteras I, Subirats E, Strapazzon G. Epidemiological and medical as-
pects of canyoning rescue operations. Injury. 2015;46(4):585–589.
15. Stella-Watts AC, Holstege CP, Lee JK, Charlton NP. The epidemiology
Funding of caving injuries in the United States. Wild Environ Med. 2012;23
This work was partially supported with internal funds from the (3):215–222.
Department of Defense (DoD/Veterans Administration (VA) 16. Strohle M, Beeretz I, Rugg C, et al. Canyoning accidents in Austria
Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence and from 2005 to 2018. Int J Environ Res Public Heal. 2019;17(1):102.
partially supported by research grant W81XWH-21-2-0004 17. Wild FJ. Epidemiology of mountain search and rescue operations in
from the DoD Clinical and Rehabilitative Medicine Research Banff, Yoho, and Kootenay National Parks, 2003-06. Wild Environ
Med. 2008;19(4):245–251.
Program. 18. Worley GH. Civilian helicopter search and rescue accidents in the
United States: 1980 through 2013. Wild Environ Med. 2015;26(4):
Author Contributions 544–548.
WLC, JFA, TDE, SMG, DPN, SNP, and GES participated in 19. Flinn SD. On-field management of emergent and urgent extremity
conditions. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2006;5(5):227–232.
study design. WLC, TDE, SMG, DPN, SNP, GES, and JBW 20. Auerbach P, Donner, HJ, Weiss, EA. Field guide to wilderness medi-
participated in literature acquisition. All authors participated cine. 3rd ed. Mosby, Inc.; 2008.
in analysis of literature, manuscript drafting, and critical revi- 21. Irajpour A, Kaji NS, Nazari F, et al. A comparison between the effects
sion of this manuscript. All authors approved the final version of simple and traction splints on pain intensity in patients with femur
fractures. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012;17(7):530–533.
of this manuscript. 22. Tilton B, Hubbell, F. Medicine for the backcountry. 3rd ed. Globe
Pequot Press; 1999.
Conflicts of Interest 23. Studer N, Grubbs S, Horn G, Danielson P. Evaluation of commer-
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. cially available traction splints for battlefield use. J Spec Oper Med.
2014;14(2):46–55.
24. Melamed E, Blumenfeld A, Kalmovich B, et al. Prehospital care of
Disclaimer orthopedic injuries. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(1):22–25.
This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and 25. McSwain NE, NAEMT Staff. PHTLS Prehospital Trauma Life Sup-
is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Ap- port: Military version. 6th ed. Mosby/JEMS; 2007.
proved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The view(s) 26. Martin LKD, McBride LTJ, Unangst CA, Chisholm J. Prospective
expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect study of military Special Operations medical personnel and lower
extremity fracture immobilization in an austere environment. Foot
the official policy or position of Brooke Army Medical Center, Ankle Orthop. 2020;5(2):2473011420916144.
98 | JSOM Volume 23, Edition 3 / Fall 2023

