Page 56 - JSOM Summer 2023

Disclaimer 13. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battlefield
The views, opinions, and findings contained in this research (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care
are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the [published correction appears in J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013
Department of Defense. Feb;74(2):706. Kotwal, Russell S [corrected to Kotwal, Russ S].
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–S437.
14. Oliveira L, Lawrence M. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intrave-
Author Contributions nous access program for emergency physicians, nurses, and corps-
TD conceived the study concept. SW, OA, and RH coordi- men (technicians) at a military hospital. Mil Med. 2016;181(3):
nated, collected, and analyzed the data. SW wrote the first 272–276.
draft, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript. 15. Sappenfield J, Grek S, Cooper LA, et al. Reduced complications
of supraclavicular approach in simulated central venous access:
Applicability to military medicine. Mil Med. 2019;184(Suppl 1):
References 329–334.
1. Strandenes G, De Pasquale M, Cap AP, et al. Emergency whole- 16. Goolsby CA, Goodwin TL, Vest RM. Hybrid simulation improves
blood use in the field: a simplified protocol for collection and medical student procedural confidence during EM clerkship. Mil
transfusion. Shock. 2014;41 Suppl 1:76–83. Med. 2014;179(11):1223–1227.
2. Rasmussen TE, Clouse WD, Jenkins DH, et al. The use of tem- 17. Rees PS, Lamb LE, Nicholson-Roberts TC, et al. Safety and fea-
porary vascular shunts as a damage control adjunct in the man- sibility of a strategy of early central venous catheter insertion in
agement of wartime vascular injury. J Trauma. 2006;61(1):8–15. a deployed UK military Ebola virus disease treatment unit. Inten-
3. Voller J, Tobin JM, Cap AP, et al. Joint Trauma System Clinical sive Care Med. 2015;41(5):735–743.
Practice Guideline (JTS CPG): Prehospital blood transfusion. 30 18. Johnson EN, Marconi VC, Murray CK. Hospital-acquired de-
October 2020. J Spec Oper Med. 2021;21(4):11–21. vice-associated infections at a deployed military hospital in Iraq.
4. Schauer SG, Naylor JF, Oliver JJ, et al. An analysis of casualties J Trauma. 2009;66(4 Suppl):S157–S163.
presenting to military emergency departments in Iraq and Af- 19. Nadler R, Gendler S, Benov A, et al. Intravenous access in the
ghanistan. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(1):94–99. prehospital settings: What can be learned from point-of-injury
5. O’Reilly DJ, Morrison JJ, Jansen JO, et al. Prehospital blood experience. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(2):221–226.
transfusion in the en route management of severe combat trauma: 20. Fang S, Yang J, Song L, Jiang Y, Liu Y. Comparison of three
a matched cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(3 types of central venous catheters in patients with malignant tu-
Suppl 2):S114–S120. mor receiving chemotherapy. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:
6. Tactical Field Care Antibiotics. Tactical Combat Casualty Care 1197–1204.
pocket guide. 27 April 2018. https://deployedmedicine.com/market 21. Loprieato J. Personal Communication. 2022.
/11/content/160. Accessed 17 April 2023. 22. Alsaad AA, Bhide VY, Moss JL Jr, et al. Central line proficiency
7. Tarpey MJ. Tactical combat casualty care in Operation Iraqi Free- test outcomes after simulation training versus traditional training
dom. U.S. Army Medical Dept J. 2005;38–42. to competence. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(4):550–554.
8. Glaser J, Stygall K, Cannon J, et al. Resuscitative Endovascular 23. Taniguchi J, Matsui K, Araki T, Kikawa K. Clinical training: a
Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) for hemorrhagic shock simulation program for phlebotomy. BMC Med Educ. 2008;8:7.
(CPG ID:38). Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline. 24. Gjeraa K, Møller TP, Østergaard D. Efficacy of simulation-based
31 March 2020. https://jts.amedd.army.mil/assets/docs/cpgs/ trauma team training of non-technical skills. A systematic review.
Resuscitative_Endovascular_Balloon_Occlusion_of_the_Aorta_ Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(7):775–787.
(REBOA)_for_Hemorrhagic_Shock_31_Mar_2020_ID38.pdf. 25. Sohn VY, Miller JP, Koeller CA, et al. From the combat medic
Accessed 17 April 2023. to the forward surgical team: the Madigan model for improving
9. Fisher AD, Teeter WA, Cordova CB, et al. The Role I resuscita- trauma readiness of brigade combat teams fighting the Global
tion team and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the War on Terror. J Surg Res. 2007;138(1):25–31.
aorta. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(2):65–73.10. 26. Hall AB. Randomized objective comparison of live tissue training
10. Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines for Medical Personnel. versus simulators for emergency procedures. Am Surg. 2011;77
2022: Deployed medicine. https://books.allogy.com/web/tenant/ (5):561–565.
8/books/b729b76a-1a34-4bf7-b76b-66bb2072b2a7/. Accessed 17 27. da Luz LT, Nascimento B, Tien H, et al. Current use of live tissue
April 2023. training in trauma: a descriptive systematic review. Can J Surg.
11. Schauer SG, April MD, Hill GJ, et al. Prehospital interventions 2015;58(3 Suppl 3):S125–S134.
performed on pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. 28. Kim M, Torrie I, Poisson R, et al. The value of live tissue training
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018;22(5):624–629. for Combat Casualty Care: A survey of Canadian combat medics
12. Shokoohi H, Boniface K, McCarthy M, et al. Ultrasound-guided with battlefield experience in Afghanistan. Mil Med. 2017;182(9):
peripheral intravenous access program is associated with a marked e1834–e1840.
reduction in central venous catheter use in noncritically ill emer-
gency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(2):198–203.
PMID: 37302144; DOI: 10.55460/HKH7-GWDW

54 | JSOM Volume 23, Edition 2 / Summer 2023