Page 104 - JSOM Spring 2023
P. 104

44.  Jones BH, Bovee MW, Harris JM, Cowan DN. Intrinsic risk fac-  62.  Duval  S,  Tweedie  R.  Trim  and  fill:  a  simple  funnel-plot-based
             tors for exercise-related injuries among male and female Army   method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-
             trainees. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:705–710.        analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–463.
          45.  Knapik JJ, Brosch LC, Venuto M, et al. Effect on injuries of as-  63.  Simmonds M. Quantifying the risk of error when interperting
             signing shoes based on foot shape in Air Force Basic Training. Am   funnel plots. Syst Rev. 2015;4:24.
             J Prev Med. 2010;38:S197–S211.                  64.  Tang JL, Liu JLY. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in
          46.  Knapik JJ, Montain SJ, McGraw S, Grier T, Ely M, Jones BH.   meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:477–484.
             Stress fracture risk factors in Basic Combat Training. Int J Sports   65.  Billings CE. Epidemiology of injuries and illnesses during United
             Med. 2012;940–946.                                 States Air Force Academy 2002 Basic cadet training program: doc-
          47.  Heir T, Eide G. Age, body composition, aerobic fitness and health   umenting the need for prevention. Milit Med. 2004;169:664–670.
             condition as risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in conscripts.   66.  Knapik JJ, Graham B, Cobbs J, Thompson D, Steelman R, Jones
             Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1996;6:222–227.            BH. A prospective investigation of injury incidence and injury
          48.  Taanila H, Suni J, Pihlajamaki H, et al. Aetiology and risk factors   risk factors among Army recruits in combat engineer training. J
             of musculoskeletal disorders in physically active conscripts: a fol-  Occup Med Toxicol. 2013;8(1):5.
             low-up study in the Finnish Defense Forces. BMC Musculoskelet   67.  Hruby A, Bulathsinhala L, McKinnon CJ, et al. BMI and lower
             Disord. 2010;11:146.                               extremity injury in U.S. Army soldiers, 2001–2011. Am J Prev
          49.  Hollander NA, Finestone AS, Yofe V, Bader T, Magnezi R. The as-  Med. 2016;50(6):e163–e171.
             sociation between increased body mass index and overuse injuries   68.  Schwartz O, Bulis S, Olsen CH, Glasberg E, Dudkiewicz I. The
             in Israeli Defense Force conscripts. Obes Facts. 2020;13:152–165.  association between history of an ankle sprain and traumatic me-
          50.  Knapik JJ, Swedler D, Grier T, et al. Injury reduction effective-  niscal injury among infantry combat soldiers in the Israeli De-
             ness of selecting running shoes based on plantar shape. J Strength   fense Forces: a historical cohort study. Milit Med. 2020;185(5/6):
             Condit Res. 2009;23:685–697.                       e748–e754.
          51.  Knapik JJ, Sharp MA, Canham-Chervak M, Hauret K, Patton JF,   69.  Carr DJ, Wilson C, Laing R.  Anthropometric methods for the
             Jones BH. Risk factors for training-related injuries among men   successful design of military clothing and equipment. Edited by
             and  women  in  Basic  Combat  Training.  Med  Sci  Sports  Exerc.   Spark E: Woodhead Press; 2012:49–63.
             2001;33:946–954.                                70.  Choi HJ, Garlie  T, Mitchell KB.  Effects of anthrometrics and
          52.  Jones BH, Cowan DN, Tomlinson JP, Robinson JR, Polly DW,   bodty size changes on the development of personal protective
             Frykman PN. Epidemiology of injuries associated with physical   equipment (PPE) sizing systems in the US  Army.  Natick MA,
             training among young men in the Army. Med Sci Sports Exerc.   US Army Natick Soldier RD&E Center, Technical Report No.
             1993;25:197–203.                                   TP-16/003, 2016.
          53.  Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred   71.  Bradley D. New standard Army anthropometric sizing system for
             reporting items  for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:  the   clothing and equipment.  Available at [https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/
             PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.    citations/AD1100615]. Accessed 2 September 2022.
          54.  National Institute of Health. Overweight and obesity. Symptoms   72.  Harper W, Knapik JJ, dePontbriand R. An investigation of female
             and diagnosis.  Available at [https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/  load carriage  capability.  Aberdeen  Proving Ground, MD, U.S.
             overweight-and-obesity/symptoms]. Accessed 26 August 2022.  Army Research Laboratory, Technical Report No. 1997.
          55.  Sulsky SI, Bulzacchelli MT, Zhu L, et al. Risk factors for train-  73.  Cureton KJ. Effects of experimental alterations in excess weight
             ing-related injuries during U.S.  Army Basic Combat  Training.   on physiological responses to exercise and physical performance.
             Milit Med. 2018;183(3/4):55–65.                    In Body Composition and Physical Performance Applications for
          56.  National Institute of Health. Study quality assessment tools.     Military  Services.  Edited  by  Marriott  BM,  Grumstrup-Scott  J.
             Available at [https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality   Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
             -assessment-tools]. Accessed 27 October.        74.  Cureton KJ, Sparling PB. Distance running performance and met-
          57.  Knapik JJ, Montain SJ, McGraw SM, Grier T, Ely MR, Jones BH.   abolic responses to running in men and women with excess weight
             Risk factors for stress fractures in Basic Combat Training. Int J   experimentally equated. Med Sci Sports. 1980;12:288–294.
             Sports Med. 2012;33:940–946.                    75.  Cureton KJ, Sparling PB, Evans W, Johnson SM, Kong UD, Purvis
          58.  Taanila H, Suni JH, Kannus P, et al. Risk factors of acute and   JW. Effects of experimental alterations in excess weight on aero-
             overuse musculoskeletal injuries among young conscripts: a pop-  bic capacity and distance running performance. Med Sci Sports.
             ulation-based cohort study.  BMC Musculoskelet Disord.  2015;   1978;10:194–199.
             16:104.                                         76.  Hue O, Simoneau M, Marcotte J, et al. Body weight is a strong
          59.  Huedo-Medina T, Sanchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F, Botella J.   predictor of postural stability. Gait and Posture. 2007;26:32–38.
             Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q-statistic or I  index?   77.  Son SM. Influence of obesity on postural stability in young adults.
                                                    2
             Psychol Methods. 2006;11(2):193–206.               Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016;7(6):378–381.
          60.  Sterne JAC, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-   78.  Teasdale N, Hue O, Marcotte J, et al. Reducing weight increases
             analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:   postural stability in obese and morbid obese men.  Int J Obes.
             1046–1055.                                         2007;31:153–160.
          61.  Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis
             detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J. 1997;315:629–634.





















          102  |  JSOM   Volume 23, Edition 1 / Spring 2023
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109