Page 37 - JSOM Fall 2022
P. 37

58.  Van Gog T, Rummel N. Example­based learning: integrating cog­  88.  Fitts PM, Posner MI. Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/
                 nitive  and  social­cognitive  research perspectives.  Ed  Psychol  Rev.   Cole; 1967.
                 2010;22(2):155–174.                             89.  Anderson JR. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychol Rev. 1982;89
              59.  Pea RD. The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and   (4):369–406.
                 related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activ­  90.  Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and mainte­
                 ity. J Learn Sci. 2004;13(3):423–451.               nance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad
              60.  Hutchins SD, Wickens CD, Carolan TF, Cumming JM. The influence   Med. 2004;79(10):S70–S81.
                 of cognitive load on transfer with error prevention training methods:   91.  Proctor RW, Dutta A. Skill Acquisition and Human Performance.
                 a meta­analysis. Hum Factors. 2013;55(4):854–874.   Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
              61.  Wickens C, Hutchins S, Carolan T, Cumming J. Investigating the im­  92.  Anderson JR. Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ:
                 pact of training on transfer: a meta­analytic approach. In: Proceedings   Erlbaum; 1981.
                 of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los   93.  Fisk AD, Ackerman PL, Schneider W. Automatic and controlled pro­
                 Angeles, CA; 2011.                                  cessing theory and its applications to human factors problems. In:
              62.  Carolan TF, Hutchins SD, Wickens CD, Cumming JM. Costs and bene­  Hancock PA, ed. Human Factors Psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
                 fits of more learner freedom: meta­analyses of exploratory and learner   1987:159–197.
                 control training methods. Hum Factors. 2014;56(5):999–1014.  94.  Schneider W. Training high­performance skills: fallacies and guide­
              63.  Keith N, Frese M. Effectiveness of error management training: a     lines. Hum Factors. 1985;27:285–300.
                 meta­analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2008; 93(1): 59–69.  95.  Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate
              64.  Kraiger K, Jerden E. A new look at learner control: Meta­analytic   practice in the acquisition of expert performance.  Psychol Rev.
                 results and directions for future research. In: Fiore SM, Salas E, eds.   1993;100(3):363–406.
                 Where is the learning in distance learning? Towards a science of dis-  96.  Bjork RA. Assessing our own competence: heuristics and illusions.
                 tributed learning and training. Washington, DC: American Psycholog­  In: Gopher D, Koriat A, eds. Attention and Performance XVII: Cog-
                 ical Association; 2007.                             nitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Appli-
              65.  Slamecka NJ, Graf P. The generation effect: delineation of a phenom­  cation. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1999.
                 enon. J Exper Psychol. 1978;4(6):592–604.       97.  Logan G, Klapp ST. Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended
              66.  Chi M, Glaser R, Rees E. Expertise in problem solving. In: Sternberg   practice necessary to produce automaticity? J Exper Psychol Learn
                 R, ed. Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence. Hillsdale,   Mem Cogn. 1991;17(2):179–195.
                 NJ: Erlbaum; 1982:7–75.                         98.  Ericsson A, Pool R. Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise.
              67.  Kalyuga S, Chandler P, Tuovinen J, Sweller J. When problem solving   New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2016.
                 is superior to studying worked examples. J Ed Psychol. 2001;93(3):   99.  Kotler S. The Rise of Superman: Decoding the Science of Ultimate
                 579–588.                                            Human Performance. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt;
              68.  Mayer RE, Griffith E, Jurkowitz ITN, Rothman D. Increased inter­  2014.
                 estingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation   100.  Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience.
                 leads to decreased learning. J Exper Psychol. 2008;149(4):329–339.  New York, NY: Harper Perennial; 1990.
              69.  Mayer RE, Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multi­  101.  Schmidt RA, Bjork RA. New conceptualizations of practice: com­
                 media learning. Ed Psychol. 2003;38(1):43–52.       mon principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training.
              70.  Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health   Psychol Sci. 1992;3(4):207–217.
                 professional  education:  design principles and strategies.  Med  Ed.   102.  White BY, Fredrickson JR. The ThinkerTools Inquiry Project: Mak-
                 2010;44(1):85–93.                                   ing Scientific Inquiry Accessible to Students. Princeton, NJ: Center
              71.  Mayer RE, Hegarty M, Mayer S, Campbell J. When static me­  for Performance Assessment, Educational Testing Service; 1997.
                 dia promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus nar­  103.  White BY, Fredrickson JR. Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition:
                 rated  animations  in  multimedia  instruction.  J  Exp  Psychol  Appl.   making science accessible to all students. Cogn Sci. 1998;16(1):90–91.
                 2005;11(4):256–265.                             104.   Lehrer R, Chazan D. Designing Learning Environments for Devel-
              72.  Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test­enhanced learning: taking memory   oping Understanding of Geometry and Space. Mahwah, NJ: Law­
                 tests improves long­term retention. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(3):249–255.  rence Erlbaum Associates; 1998.
              73.  Karpicke JD, Roediger HL 3rd. The critical importance of retrieval   105.  De Groot AD. Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague, the Neth­
                 for learning. Science. 2008;319(5865):966–968.      erlands: Mouton; 1965.
              74.  Roediger HL 3rd, Karpicke JD. The power of testing memory: basic   106.  Ericsson K, Charness N. Expert performance: its structure and ac­
                 research and implications for educational practice. Perspect Psychol   quisition. Am Psychol. 1994;49(8):725–745.
                 Sci. 2006;1(3):181–210.                         107.  Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Ed Research.
              75.  Wheeler MA, Roediger HL III. Disparate effects of repeated testing:   2007;77(1):81–112.
                 reconciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results. Psychol Sci.   108.  Carroll A. The Feedback Imperative: How to Give Everyday Feed-
                 1992;3(4):240–245.                                  back to Speed Up Your Team’s Success. Austin, TX: River Grove
              76.  Roediger HL 3rd, Butler AC. The critical role of retrieval practice in   Books; 2014.
                 long­term retention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(1):20–27.  109.  Thomas JE. Giving Effective Feedback. Harvard Business Review.
              77.  Karpicke JD. Retrieval­based learning: active retrieval promotes   Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation;
                 meaningful learning. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(3):157–163.  2014.
              78.  Weinstein Y, McDermott KB, Roediger H. A comparison of study   110.  Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, eds.  How People Learn:
                 strategies for passages: rereading, answering questions, and generat­  Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National
                 ing questions. J Exper Psychol Appl. 2010;16(3):308–316.  Academy Press; 2000.
              79.  McDaniel MA, Howard DC, Einstein GO. The read­recite­review study   111.  Johnson A, Proctor RW. Attention: Theory and Practice. Thousand
                 strategy: effective and portable. Psychol Sci. 2009;20(4):516–522.  Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.
              80.  Mane AM, Adams JA, Donchin E. Adaptive and part­whole train­  112.  Navon D. Resources: a theoretical soup stone.  Psychol Rev.
                 ing in acquisition of a complex perceptual­motor skill. Acta Psychol.   1984;91(2):216–334.
                 1989;71(1­3):179–196.                           113.  Navon D, Gopher D. On the economy of the human processing sys­
              81.  Wickens CD, Hutchins S, Carolan T, Cummings J. Effectiveness of   tem. Psychol Rev. 1979;86(3):214–255.
                 part­task training and increasing­difficulty training strategies: a me­  114.  Wickens CD. Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman
                 ta­analysis approach. Hum Factors. 2013;55(2):461–470.   R, Davies R, eds. Varieties of Attention. New York, NY: Academic
              82.  Damos DL, Wickens CD. The identification and transfer of timeshar­  Press; 1984:63–101.
                 ing skills. Acta Psychol. 1980;46(1):15–39.     115.  Tharp RG, Gallimore R. Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning,
              83.  Gopher D, Weil M, Siegel D. Practice under changing priorities: an   and Schooling in Social Context. New York, NY: Cambridge Univer­
                 approach to the training of complex skills.  Acta Psychol.  1989;71   sity Press; 1988.
                 (1–3):147–177.                                  116.  Nater S, Gallimore R. You Haven’t Taught Until They Have Learned.
              84.  Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, Wixted JT, Rohrer D. Distributed prac­  Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology; 2005.
                 tice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychol   117.  Gallimore R, Tharp R. What a coach can teach a teacher, 1975–
                 Bull. 2006;132(3):354–380.                          2005: reflections and reanalysis of John Wooden’s teaching prac­
              85.  Pashler H, Rohrer D, Cepeda NJ. Temporal spacing and learning. APS   tices. Sport Psychol. 2004;18(2):119–137.
                 Observer. 2006;19(30):38.                       118.  Won SK, Doughty CB, Young AL, et al. Rapid cycle deliberate prac­
              86.  Donovan JJ, Radosevich DJ. A meta­analytic review of the distribu­  tice improves retention of pediatric resuscitation skills compared
                 tion of practice effect: now you see it, now you don’t. J Appl Psychol.   with postsimulation debriefing. Simul Healthc. 2022;17(1):e20–e27.
                 1999;84(5):795–805.                             119.  Roussin CJ, Weinstock P. SimZones: an organizational innovation for
              87.  Healy AF, Bourne LE Jr. Training Cognition: Optimizing Efficiency,   simulation programs and centers. Acad Med. 2017;92(8):1114–1120.
                 Durability, and Generalizability. New York, NY: Psychology Press;
                 2012.





                                                                                       Unorthodox Training Methods  |  35
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42