Page 35 - JSOM Fall 2022
P. 35

concurrently), immediately after a skill is performed (i.e., adja­  performed until mastery is achieved before introducing the el­
              cent feedback), and minutes to days after an event (i.e., delayed   ement back into overly stressful situations that are producing
                      42
              feedback).  When students are interrupted and given concur­  subpar results and creating bad habits. 119
              rent feedback, they may not process the feedback particularly
              well. Cognitive scientists suggest that this is called dual­task   FIGURE 1  SimZones framework that guides all course development
                                                                 and delivery at the Boston Children’s Hospital Simulator Program,
              interference: their brains are so busy processing information   2015–present.
              and trying to execute a skill that the feedback isn’t processed
              or incorporated. 111–114  Likewise, if feedback is done hours or
              days later, the information may lack temporal contiguity: the
              learners don’t recall the events or what they did and therefore
              cannot incorporate the feedback appropriately. Feedback im­
              mediately after task performance may be the most effective.

              When it comes to coaching discrete medical performance
              skills, the content of the feedback and what instructors tell stu­
              dents is particularly important. Referring back to the under­
              standing of cognitive load, feedback should generally aim at
              decreasing intrinsic load, optimizing germane load, and elim­
              inating extraneous load. Retrospective research into effective
              coaching and skill development seems to echo this sentiment.
              Feedback by master coaches is timely, succinct, specific, and
              action­focused. 115–117  It is also generally iterative: the skills are
              repeated and evaluated to see whether feedback was incorpo­
              rated appropriately, followed by confirmation or further clar­  From Roussin CJ, Weinstock P. SimZones: an organizational inno­
              ification. 98,117  Other novel methods for providing immediate   vation for simulation programs and centers. Acad Med. 2017;92(8):
              timely feedback in conjunction with quickly repeated practice   1114–1120. Used with permission.
              have demonstrated benefit.
                                                                 Conclusion
              A recent study demonstrated that rapid cycle deliberate   Understanding the elements of instruction that produce highly
              practice (RCDP) was superior to post­simulation debriefing   trained and efficient performers should be the goal of every in­
                   118
              (PSD).  RCDP used direct and timely feedback from the in­  structor, teacher, leader, mentor, and professor. Over time, our
              structor to the user. Traditionally, a PSD model is used in train­  understanding of cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and edu­
              ing for pre­hospital medicine on the battlefield, which consists   cation has evolved. It is important that instructors understand
              of a team­based simulation followed by a long, after­action   and incorporate these concepts in prehospital trauma train­
              review, otherwise known as a PSD. RCDP differs from this   ing. Past achievements and experiences are meant to facilitate
              strategy by providing a known script and choreography be­  growth, strengthen one’s resolve, and ultimately help instructors
              tween  the  team  members  while  the  instructor  provides  re­  develop into well­rounded individuals. Instructors cannot stand
              al­time feedback through coaching and inquiry. Simply, there   on virtue and past experiences alone; they must amend their
              should be no secrets as to how to treat common scenarios and   techniques to include the science of effective teaching and train­
              what exactly should happen on the individual and team levels   ing. In light of developments in the science of technical skills
              during these actions. Using this approach has been shown to   development, far skills transfer, and deliberate practice, certain
              increase confidence and reduce cognitive load while being con­  training techniques should be reconsidered. Furthermore, mo­
              ducive to long­term retention.  Ultimately, it aims to reduce   dalities should be updated to include the fundamental principles
                                     118
              time between scenarios by eliminating long debriefings so that   of such concepts as deliberate practice, CLT, and SET.
              more quality repetitions can be achieved in a shorter period.
                                                                 Disclaimer
              Regardless of the strategy used, the cornerstone of high­qual­  The  views  expressed  herein  are  those  of the  author(s)  and
              ity instruction is demonstrations across all facets and training   do not reflect the official policy or position of University of
              modalities led by subject matter experts. Often, demonstra­  New Mexico School of Medicine, Department of the Army,
              tions cease to happen after the individual skills stations or the   Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense, or the
              Zone 0 period of instruction  (Figure 1). In turn, a gap is   US Government.
                                     119
              formed between doing the specific skills and then actually put­
              ting them all together in a realistic scenario. This gap is often   Disclosures
              too large a steppingstone for students to bridge on their own   The authors have no disclosures to report.
              accord and is easily mitigated through full­assessment demon­
              strations by subject matter experts. It is important that stu­  References
              dents continue through every zone of instruction until they are   1.  Feltovich PJ, Prietula MJ, Ericsson KA. Studies of expertise from psy­
              in Zones 3 and 4. Additionally, regardless of student compe­  chological perspectives. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ,
                                                                   Hoffman RR, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Ex-
              tency or experience, refresher courses should be reset back to   pert Performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2006:
              Zone 0 or Zone 1 to build back up from that point to prevent   41–67.
              basic skill atrophy. Similarly, if an operational unit is not per­  2.  Schneider W, Fisk A. Concurrent automatic and controlled visual
                                                                   search: can processing occur without resource cost?  J Exp Psychol
              forming well during team­based scenarios (e.g., Zone 4), then   Learn Mem Cogn. 1982;8(4):261–278.
              the scenario should be scaled back as necessary. If possible,   3.  Schneider W, Shiffrin RM. Controlled and automatic human informa­
                                                                   tion processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev. 1977;
              the team should be reset back to Zone 2, where RCDP can be   84(1):1–66.
                                                                                       Unorthodox Training Methods  |  33
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40