Page 36 - JSOM Fall 2022
P. 36

4.  Shiffrin RM, Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human infor­  and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making. Boston, MA:
             mation processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a   Springer; 1993:293–308.
             general theory. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):127–189.  32.  Woods DD, Johannesen LJ, Cook R, Sarter NB. Behind the human
           5.  Lajoie SP. Developing professional expertise with a cognitive appren­  error:  cognitive  systems,  computers,  and  hindsight.  State­of­the­
             ticeship model: examples from avionics and medicine. In: Ericsson   Art Report. Crew System Ergonomics Integration Analysis Center
             KA, ed.  Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measure-  ( CSERIAC). Wright­Patterson AFB, OH. December 1994. https://www
             ment of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Envi-  .researchgate.net/profile/David­Woods­19/publication/235192758_
             ronments. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2009:61–83.  Behind_Human_Error_Cognitive_Systems_Computers_
           6.  Johnson-Laird PN. Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni­  and_Hindsight/links/56780be908aebcdda0ebadd0/Behind­
             versity Press; 1983.                               Human­Error­Cognitive­Systems­Computers­and­Hindsight.pdf
           7.  Norman DA. Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner D,   ?origin=publication_detail.
             Stevens AL, eds. Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum   33.  Endsley MR. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhance­
             Associates; 1983:7–14.                             ment. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting.
           8.  Serfaty D, MacMillan J, Entin EE, Entin EB. The decision­ making   1988;32(2):97–101.
             expertise of battle commanders. In: Zsambok CE, Klein GA, eds. Nat-  34.  Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic sys­
             uralistic Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associ­  tems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):32–64.
             ates; 1997:233–246.                             35.  Klein GA, Calderwood R, Clinton-Cirocco A. Rapid decision making
           9.  Klein G. A recognition­primed decision (RPD) model of rapid deci­  on the fire ground. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society An-
             sion making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE,   nual Meeting. 1986;30(6):576–580.
             eds. Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood, NJ:   36.  Newell A. Artificial intelligence and the concept of mind. In: Schank
             Ablex Publishing Corp; 1993:138–147.               RC, Colby KM, eds. Computer models of thought and language. San
          10.  Ross KG, Klein G, Thunholm P, Schmitt JF, Baxter HC. The recogni­  Francisco, CA: W.H. Frelman;1973:1–60.
             tion­primed decision model. Mil Rev. 2004;Jul–Aug:6–10.  37.  Endsley MR, Bolstad C. Individual differences in pilot situation
          11.  Salas E, Driskell JE, Hughes S. Introduction: the study of stress and   awareness. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1994;4(3):241–264.
             human performance. In: Driskell JE, Salas E, eds.  Stress and Hu-  38.  Endsley MR. Pilot situation awareness: the challenge for the training
             man Performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;   community. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training Sys-
             1996:1–46.                                         tems Conference. American Defense Preparedness Association. Fort
          12.  Staal MA. Stress, Cognition, and Human Performance: A Literature   Worth, TX; 1989.
             Review and Conceptual Framework. NASA/TM­2004­212824. Mof­  39.  Endsley MR. Expertise and situation awareness. In: Ericsson KA,
             fet Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Ad ministration; 2004.  Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, eds. The Cambridge Hand-
          13.  Vogel S, Schwabe L. Learning and memory under stress: implications   book of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York, NY: Cam­
             for the classroom. NPJ Sci Learn. 2016;1(1):1–10.  bridge University Press; 2006:41–67.
          14.  Schönfeld P, Ackermann K, Schwabe L. Remembering under stress:   40.  St John M, Stallman H. Four design principles for supporting situa­
             different roles of autonomic arousal and glucocorticoids in memory   tion awareness. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak. 2008;2:118–139.
             retrieval. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;39:249–256.  41.  St John M, Stallman HS, Manes DE, Feher BA, Morrison JG. Heu­
          15.  Smeets T, Giesbrecht T, Jelicic M, Merckelbach H. Context­ dependent   ristic automation for decluttering tactical displays.  Hum Factors.
             enhancement  of  declarative  memory  performance  following  acute   2005;47(3):509–525.
             psychosocial stress. Biol Psychol. 2007;76(1­2):116–123.  42.  Wickins CD, Hollands JG. Engineering Psychology and Human Per-
          16.  Schwabe  L,  Bohringer  A,  Chatterjee  M,  Schachinger  H. Effects of   formance. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice­Hall; 2000.
             pre­learning stress on memory of neutral, positive and negative   43.  Johnston  JH,  Cannon-Bowers  JA.  Training  for  stress  exposure.  In:
             words: different roles of cortisol and autonomic arousal. Neurobiol   Driskell JE, Salas E, eds. Stress and Human Performance. Mahwah,
             Learn Mem. 2008;90(1):44–53.                       NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996.
          17.  Scwabe L, Wolf OT. Learning under stress impairs memory function.   44.  Driskell JE, Johnston JH. Stress exposure training. In: Cannon­
             Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010;93(2):183–188.           Bowers JA, Salas E, eds. Making Decisions under Stress: Implications
          18.  Smeets T, Otgaar J, Candel I, Wolf OT. True of false? Memory is   for Individual and Team Training. Washington, DC: American Psy­
             differentially affected by stress­induced cortisol elevations and sym­  chological Association; 1998:191–217.
             pathetic activity at consolidation and retrieval. Psychoneuroendocri-  45.  Driskell JE, Johnston JH, Salas E. Does stress training generalize to
             noloy. 2008;339(10):1378–1386.                     novel settings? Hum Factors. 2001;43(1):99–110.
          19.  Wickens CD, Hollands JG, Banbury S, Parasuraman R. Engineering   46.  Saunders T, Driskell JE, Johnston JH, Salas E. The effect of stress
             Psychology and Human Performance. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:   inoculation training on anxiety and performance.  J Occup Health
             Pearson Education; 2013:197–244.                   Psychol. 1996;1(2):170–186.
          20.  Kelly AMC, Garavan H. Human functional neuroimaging of   47.  Gaab J, Blättler N, Menzi T, Pabst B, Stoyer S, Ehlert U. Random­
             brain changes associated with practice.  Cereb Cortex. 2005;15(8):   ized controlled evaluation of the effects of cognitive–behavioral stress
             1089–1102.                                         management on cortisol responses to acute stress in healthy subjects.
          21.  Logan GD. Skill and automaticity: relations, implications, and future   Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2003;28(6):767–779.
             directions.  Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1985;39(2):367–386.   48.  Gaab J, Sonderegger L, Scherrer S, Ehlert U. Psychoneuroendocrine
             http://www.psy.vanderbilt.edu/faculty/logan/1985LoganCJP.pdf.  effects of cognitive­behavioral stress management in a naturalistic
          22.  Kuhlmann S, Piel M, Wolf OT. Impaired memory retrieval after   setting: a randomized controlled trial.  Psychoneuroendocrinology.
             psychosocial stress in healthy young men. J Neurosci. 2005;25(11):   2006;31(4):428–438.
             2977–2982                                       49.  Druckman D, Swets J. Enhancing Human Performance: Issues, The-
          23.  Schwabe L, Wolf OT. The context counts: congruent learning and   ories, and Techniques. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;
             testing environments prevent memory retrieval impairment following   1988.
             stress. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009;9(3):229–236.  50.  Bandura A, Reese L, Adams NE. Microanalysis of action and fear
          24.  Schwabe L, Wolf OT. Stress modulates the engagement of multiple   arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self­efficacy. J
             memory systems in classification learning. J Neurosci. 2012;32(32):   Pers Soc Psychol. 1982;43(1):5–21.
             11042–11049.                                    51.  Locke EA, Frederick E, Lee C, Bobko P. Effect of self­efficacy, goals,
          25.  Vogel S, Klumpers F, Krugers HJ, et al. Blocking the mineralocorti­  and task strategies on task performance. J Appl Psychol. 1984;69(2):
             coids receptor in humans prevents the stress­induced enhancement of   241–251.
             centromedial amygdala connectivity with the dorsal striatum. Neuro-  52.  Keinan G, Friedland N. Training effective performance under stress:
             psychopharmacology. 2015;40(4):947–956.            queries, dilemmas, and possible solutions. In: Driskell JE, Salas E, eds.
          26.  Schwabe L, Tegenthoff M, Höffken O, Wolf OT. Concurrent gluco­  Stress and Human Performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
             corticoid and noradrenergic activity shifts instrumental behavior from   Associates; 1996:257–277.
             goal­directed to habitual control. J Neurosci. 2010;30(24):8190–8196.  53.  Thompson SC. Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer
          27.  Schwabe L, Höffken O, Tegenthoff M, Wolf OT. Preventing the   to a simple question. Psychol Bull. 1981;90(1):89–101.
             stress­induced shift from goal­directed to habit action with a b­adren­  54.  Sala G, Aksayli ND, Tatlidil S, Tatsumi T, Gondo Y, Gobet F. Near
             ergic antagonist. J Neurosci. 2011;31(47):17317–17325.  and far transfer in cognitive training: a second­order  meta­analysis.
          28.  Schwabe L, Tegenthoff M, Höffken O, Wolf OT. Simultaneous glu­  Collabra Psychol. 2019 5(1):1–22.
             cocorticoid and noradrenergic activity disrupts the neural basis of   55.  Sweller J, van Merrienboer JJG, Paas FGW. Cognitive architecture
             goal­directed action in the human brain.  J Neurosci. 2012;32(30):   and instructional design. Ed Psych Rev. 1998;10(3):251–296.
             10146–10155.                                    56.  Catrambone R, Carroll JM. Learning a word processing system with
          29.  Luchins AS. Mechanization in problem solving: the effect of Einstel-  training wheels and guided exploration. In: Proceedings of CHI &
             lung. Psychol Monographs. 1942;54(6):i–95.         GI Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Conference.
          30.  Zakay D. The impact of time perception processes on decision mak­  New York, NY: Association of Computing Machinery; 1987:169–
             ing under time stress. In: Maule AJ, Svenson O, eds. Time Pressure   174.
             and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making. Boston, MA:   57.  Paas F, van Gog T. Principles for designing effective and efficient
             Springer; 1993:59–72.                              training of complex cognitive skills. In: Durso F, ed. Reviews of Hu-
          31.  Shanteau J, Dino G.  Environmental stressor effects on creativity   man Factors and Ergonomics. Vol 5. Santa Monica, CA:  Human Fac­
             and decision making. In: Maule AJ, Svenson O, eds. Time Pressure   tors and Ergonomics Society; 2009.


          34  |  JSOM   Volume 22, Edition 3 / Fall 2022
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41