Page 93 - JSOM Summer 2022
P. 93

(Dilaudid), or a continuous infusion of fentanyl. For sedation,   9.  Keck M, Herndon DH, Kamolz LP, et al. Pathophysiology of
              current practice in critical care is to minimize the use of ben-  burns. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2009;159(13–14):327–336.
              zodiazepines, although pre-procedural use of oral lorazepam is   10.  Bittner EA, Shank E, Woodson L, Martyn JJ. Acute and perioper-
              useful to address anticipatory anxiety before painful procedures   ative care of the burn-injured patient. Anesthesiology. 2015;122
                                                                    (2):448–464.
              in ward patients. Patients must be closely monitored when be-  11.  Jeschke MG, Gauglitz GG, Kulp GA, et al. Long-term persistence
              ing treated with narcotics or sedatives, with specific attention   of the pathophysiologic response to severe burn injury.  PloS
              to a patient’s cardiovascular and respiratory physiology. 10  ONE. 2011;6(7):e21245.
                                                                 12.  Muehlberger T, Ottomann C, Toman N, et al. Emergency pre-
                                                                    hospital care of burn patients. Surgeon. 2010;8(2):101–104.
              Conclusion                                         13.  Chen MC, Chen MH, Wen BS, et al. The impact of inhalation
                                                                    injury in patients with small and moderate burns. Burns. 2014;
              Providing medical care for patients with burn injuries is a   40(8):1481–1486.
              complex task. Caring for this patient population in long-range   14.  Tredget EE, Shankowsky HA, Taerum TV, et al. The role of in-
              rescue scenarios brings an additional set of challenges and op-  halation injury in burn trauma. A Canadian experience. Annals
              portunities. For the pararescue missions referenced in the case   Surg. 1990;212(6):720.
              study, nine out of the 10 major burn patients survived their   15.  Kauvar DS, Cancio LC, Wolf SE, et al. Comparison of combat
              injuries due to the advanced medical care they received in the   and non-combat burns from ongoing US military operations. J
                                                                    Surg Res. 2006;132(2):195–200.
              pre- hospital setting. This statistic reinforces the importance of   16.  Walker PF, Buehner MF, Wood LA, et al. Diagnosis and manage-
              burn management for out of hospital providers, particularly in   ment of inhalation injury: an updated review. Crit Care. 2015;19
              the prolonged field care setting.                     (1):1–12.
                                                                 17.  Foncerrada G, Culnan DM, Capek KD, et al. Inhalation injury in
              We have highlighted a series of treatments and considerations   the burned patient. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(3 Suppl 2):S98–S105.
              that providers should consider in such scenarios, including air-  18.  Harshman J, Roy M, Cartotto R. Emergency Care of the Burn
              way management, fluid resuscitation, wound care including   Patient before the burn center: a systematic review and meta-anal-
                                                                    ysis. J Burn Care Res. 2019;40(2):166–188.
              debridement and escharotomies, temperature and pain man-  19.  Hassan Z, Wong JK, Bush J, et al. Assessing the severity of inha-
              agement, infection control, and pain management. Providers   lation injuries in adults. Burns. 2010;36(2):212–216.
              must also be prepared to deliver such interventions over the   20.  Ryan CM, Fagan SP, Goverman J, Sheridan RL. Grading inhala-
              course of many hours and potentially days. While such care   tion injury by admission bronchoscopy. Crit Care Med. 2012;40
              may be challenging, working with this unique and complex   (4):1345–1346.
              population provides opportunities to use interventions that   21.  McCulloh C, Nordin A, Talbot LJ, et al. Accuracy of prehospi-
              hold the potential to drastically improve survival and quality   tal care providers in determining total body surface area burned
                                                                    in severe pediatric thermal injury. J Burn Care Res. 2018;39(4):
              of life.                                              491–496.
                                                                 22.  Pham C, Collier Z, Gillenwater J. Changing the way we think
              Disclosures                                           about burn size estimation. J Burn Care Res. 2019;40(1):1–11.
              We have no conflicts to disclose.                  23.  Freiburg C, Igneri P, Sartorelli K, Rogers F. Effects of differences
                                                                    in percent total body surface area estimation on fluid resuscitation
                                                                    of transferred burn patients. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28(1):42–48.
              Funding                                            24.  Goverman J, Bittner EA, Friedstat JS, et al. Discrepancy in initial
              We received no funding for this effort.               pediatric burn estimates and its impact on fluid resuscitation. J
                                                                    Burn Care Res. 2015;36(5):574–579.
              Disclaimer                                         25.  Feng JY, Chien JY, Kao KC, et al. Predictors of early onset mul-
              The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private   tiple organ dysfunction in major burn patients with ventilator
              view of the authors and are not to be construed as official or   support: Experience from a mass casualty explosion. Sci Reports.
                                                                    2018);8(1):1–9.
              as reflecting the views of the United States Government, De-  26.  Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and
              partment of Defense, its Services, or the Department of State.  organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in
                                                                    sepsis. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–1655.
              References                                         27.  Hettiaratchy S, Papini R. Initial management of a major burn: II—
              1.  Mix JW, DeSoucy ES, Hilser A, et al. A case series of Air Force   assessment and resuscitation. BMJ. 2004; 329(7457):101–103.
                pararescue long-range ocean rescues. J Spec Oper Med. 2020;20(3):   28.  Devgan L, Bhat S, Aylward S, Spence RJ. Modalities for the as-
                122–127.                                            sessment of burn wound depth. J Burns Wounds. 2006;5:e2.
              2.  Arturson G. Pathophysiology of the burn wound. Ann Chir Gynae-  29.  Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battlefield
                col. 1980;69(5):178–190.                            (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care.
              3.  Hettiaratchy S, Dziewulski P. ABC of burns: pathophysiology and   J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–S437.
                types of burns. BMJ. 2004;328(7453):1427–1429.   30.  Chung KK, Wolf SE, Cancio LC, et al. Resuscitation of severely
              4.  Kara YA. Chapter 2: Burn etiology and pathogenesis. In: Kartal SP,   burned  military  casualties:  fluid  begets  more  fluid.  J  Trauma
                Bayramgurler D, eds. Hot Topics in Burn Injuries. London, UK:   Acute Care Surg. 2009;67(2):231–237.
                IntechOpen; 2018:17–33.                          31.  Bracco D. Burn fluid resuscitation: Let the autopilot do it!. Crit
              5.  Singh M, Prakash S. Chapter 24: Burn: A Clinical Perspective. In:   Care Med. 2011;39(9):2178–2180.
                Shrivastava, D. Theory and Applications of Heat Transfer in Hu-  32.  Friedrich JB, Sullivan SR, Engrav LH, et al. Is supra-Baxter resus-
                mans. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2018:513–527.  citation in burn patients a new phenomenon? Burns. 2004;30(5):
              6.  Horton JW, White J, Maass D, Sanders B. Arginine in burn injury   464–466.
                improves cardiac performance and prevents bacterial transloca-  33.  Hulse EJ, Thomas GO. Vascular access on the 21st century mili-
                tion. J Appl Physio. 1998;84(2):695–702.            tary battlefield. BMJ Mil Health. 2010;156(Suppl 4):S385–S390.
              7.  Pham TN, Cancio LC, Gibran NS. American Burn Association   34.  Saffle JR. The phenomenon of “fluid creep” in acute burn resus-
                practice guidelines burn shock resuscitation.  J Burn Care Res.   citation. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28(3):382–395.
                2008;29(1):257–266.                              35.  Greenhalgh DG. Early management of burn patients and fluid
              8.  Kaddoura I, Abu-Sittah G, Ibrahim A, et al. Burn injury: review of   resuscitation. In: Jeschke MG, Kamolz LP, Sjöberg F, Wolf SE.
                pathophysiology and therapeutic modalities in major burns. Ann   Handbook of Burns.  Vol 1.  Springer International Publishing;
                Burns Fire Disasters. 2017;30(2):95–102.            2020:199–209.

                                                                               Pathophysiology and Treatment of Burns  |  91
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98