Page 143 - JSOM Summer 2022
P. 143

An Ongoing Series




                              Physiological and Psychological Stressors Affecting
                     Performance, Health, and Recovery in Special Forces Operators:
                                               Challenges and Solutions
                                                     A Scoping Review




                                       Reginald B. O’Hara, PhD *; Lewis Sussman, PsyD ;
                                                                                      2
                                                               1
                                                           3
                                                                               4
                       Jeffrey Tiede, MD, MSS, D.ABA-PM ; Riley Sheehan, PhD ; Benjamin Keizer, PhD   5




              ABSTRACT
              Introduction: Special Operations Forces (SOF) Operators (SOs)   and OTS, resulting in harmful psychological and hormonal
              are exposed to high levels of physiological and cognitive stress-  disruptions. The recurring demands placed on SOs may re-
              ors early in their career, starting with the rigors of training,   sult in a chronically high burden of physical and mental stress
              combined with years of recurring deployments. Over time,   known as allostatic overload. Future investigation, especially
              these stressors may degrade SOs’ performance, health, and   in the purview of longitudinal implementation, health, and re-
              recovery. Objectives: (1) To evaluate sources identifying and   covery monitoring, is necessary for the health and readiness of
              describing physiological and psychological stressors affecting   the SOF population.
              performance, health, and recovery in SOs, and (2) to explore
              interventions and phenomena of interest, such as the biolog-  Keywords: humans; cognition; overtraining syndrome; allo static
              ical mechanisms of overtraining syndrome (OTS). Methods:   load; military personnel; sports
              This review followed the recommendations and methodology
              of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting
              Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for
              Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A database search   Introduction
              from December 1993 to December 2021 was performed in   Special Operations Forces Operators (SOs) experience fre-
              PubMed,  the  Cochrane  Library,  and  the  Defense  Technical   quent combat deployments and missions that expose them
              Information Center (DTIC). Potential articles were identified   to a plethora of physiological and psychological stressors.
                                                                                                               1-3
              using search terms from their titles, abstracts, and full texts.   To meet the mission’s unique physical, emotional, and envi-
              Articles effectively addressing the review questions and objec-  ronmental demands, SOs train rigorously and continuously.
              tives were eligible. Results: After 19 articles were excluded for   Ideally, this training process is allostasis, the body’s optimal
              not meeting established inclusion criteria, a total of 92 full-text   adaptive behavioral and physiological state of readiness to an
              articles were assessed for eligibility. After the final analysis,   environmental stressor.
              72 articles were included. Conclusions: Allostatic imbalance
              may occur when supra-maximal demands are prolonged and   SOs routinely operate in austere environments ranging from
              repeated. Without adequate recovery, health and performance   dry/arid deserts to subarctic/arctic regions, traverse through
              may decline, leading to nonfunctional overreaching (NFO)   varying terrain, and sometimes operate at extreme altitudes. It
              *Correspondence to reginald.b.ohara.civ@mail.mil
              1 Reginald B. O’Hara currently serves as director of the Military Performance Laboratory at the Center for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabil-
              itation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio–Fort Sam Houston, TX. Dr. O’Hara formerly served as the laboratory
              director and lead scientific investigator at the United States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine’s Satellite Human Performance Laboratory,
              housed within the United States Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.  Lewis Sussman is a clinical psychologist at the
                                                                               2
              Center for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio–Fort Sam Houston.
              3 COL Jeffrey Tiede is a pain management physician who serves as Director of the Center for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabilitation Medi-
              cine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio–Fort Sam Houston. He also commands the 5th Brigade (HS), 94th Training Division,
              United States Army Reserves. Riley Sheehan is a contract research scientist at the Center for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,
                                  4
              Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio–Fort Sam Houston; the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military
              Medicine, Bethesda, MD; and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda.  Benjamin Keizer is a board-certified clinical
                                                                                  5
              health psychologist at the Center for the Intrepid and serves as the director of the Functional Restoration Program, Department of Rehabilitation
              Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio–Fort Sam Houston.
                                                              139
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148