Page 117 - JSOM Winter 2021

Conclusions 15. Gean RP, Martin RD, Cassat M, Mears SC. A systematic review
and meta-analysis of injuries in Crossfit. J Surg Orthop Adv.
Although most investigations covered in the reviews were of 2020;29(1):26–30.
lower methodologic quality, the currently available evidence 16. Rodriguez MA, Garcia-Calleja P, Terrados N, Crespo I, Del Valle
suggests that HIFT has an injury rate similar to that of other M, Olmedillas H. Injuries in CrossFit: a systematic review of epi-
sports and exercise activities. The most commonly injured an- demiology and risk factors. Phys Sportsmed. 2021. In press.
atomic locations are the shoulder, back, and knees. There is a 17. Last JM, Abramson JH, Friedman GD, Porta M, Spasoff RA,
need for more prospective studies that have adequate sample Thuriaux M, eds. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 3rd ed. New
York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
sizes, account for the quantity of HIFT, assess confounders, 18. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Com-
and track injuries over time. mon method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of
the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;
Disclaimer 88(5):879–903.
The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author 19. Furnham A. Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation.
and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Depart- Pers Individ Diff. 1985;7(3):385–400.
ment of Defense, Department of the Army, US Army Medical
Department, or the United States. The use of trademark names
does not imply endorsement by the US Army but is intended
only to assist in the identification of a specific product.

Disclosure
The author has nothing to disclose.

References
1. Knapik JJ. Extreme conditioning programs: potential benefits
and potential risks. J Spec Oper Med. 2015;15(3):108–113.
2. Feito Y, Heinrich KM, Butcher SJ, Poston WSC. High-intensity
functional training (HIFT): definition and research implications
for improved fitness. Sports (Basel). 2018;6:76.
3. Henrich KM, Spencer V, Fehl N, Poston WSC. Mission essen-
tial fitness: comparison of functional circuit training to tradi-
tional Army physical training for active duty military. Mil Med.
2012;177(10):1125–1130.
4. Knapik JJ, Rieger W, Palkoska F, Van Camp S, Darakjy S. United
States Army physical readiness training: rationale and evaluation
of the physical training doctrine. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23
(4):1353–1362.
5. Glassman G. What is CrossFit? An interview with Fast Com-
pany magazine. CrossFit Journal. 2011;September 20:1–2. http:// INTRODUCTORY OFFER!
journal.crossfit.com/2011/09/greggameswhatiscf.tpl. Accessed
27 October 2021.
6. Galic B. 81 CrossFit statistics you should know. https://www.live Chinook Medical Gear’s NEW
strong.com/article/13730816-crossfit-statistics/. Accessed 27 Oc- IV Start Kit with Catheter, 18Ga
tober 2021.
7. Army Institute of Public Health. What Army Leaders Should
Know about Extreme Conditioning Programs. Report No. 2014. ON SALE!
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Institute of Public Health;
2021.
8. National Institutes of Health. Study Quality Assessment Tools.
https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality- assessment
-tools. Accessed 27 October 2021.
9. Poston WSC, Haddock CK, Heinrich KM, Jahnke SA, Jitnarin
N, Batchelor DB. Is high-intensity functional training (HIFT)/
CrossFit safe for military fitness training? Mil Med. 2016;181
(7):627–637.
10. Tibana RA, Frade de Sousa NM. Are extreme conditioning pro- Product No. #020210 | NSN 6515-01-693-6923
grammes effective and safe? A narrative review of high-intensity Was $16.27
functional training methods research paradigms and findings.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Ed. 2018;4(1):e000435. NOW $10.99
11. Meyer J, Morrison J, Zuniga J. The benefits and risks of CrossFit: EXPIRES: 12/31/2021
a systematic review. Workplace Health Saf. 2017;65(12):612–618.
12. Klimek C, Ashbeck C, Brook AJ, Durall C. Are injuries more The Chinook Medical Gear IV Start Kit with 18-gauge
common with CrossFit training than other forms of exercise? J catheter contains essential items for starting and securing
Sport Rehabil. 2018;27(3):295–299.
13. Claudino JG, Gabbett TJ, Bourgeois F, et al. CrossFit overview: a saline lock for quick and eective venous cannulation.
systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2018;4
(1):11.
14. Barranco-Ruiz Y, Villa-Gonzalez E, Martinez-Amat A, Silva-
Grigoletto MED. Prevalence of injuries in exercise programs *Limited Quantities Available. Order Now While Supplies Last! Website Orders Only. Discount applied to Retail Pricing. Cannot be combined with other oŒers.
based on CrossFit, cross-training and high-intensity functional
training methodologies: a systematic review. J Hum Kinet. 2020; www.chinookmed.com | 800.766.1365
73:251–265.

High-Intensity Functional Training Injuries | 115