Page 71 - 2020 JSOM Winter
P. 71

Methods                                            FIGURE 1  Syndaver  model for insertion of the iGel.
                                                                               ™
              Ethics
              The US Army Institute of Surgical Research regulatory office
              reviewed protocol H-19-013 and determined it met criteria
              for exemption from institutional review board oversight. Our
              study met all institutional requirements. We requested and re-
              ceived a waiver of consent documentation. We provided all
              participants information sheets.

              Subjects and Setting
              Our study took place at various locations throughout the
              Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) – Fort Sam Houston, Texas,
              USA. JBSA Fort Sam Houston serves as the primary train-
              ing hub for all non-special forces combat medics and medics
              among all three services. Moreover, it is the largest training
              center for graduate medical education at the Brooke Army
              Medical Center (BAMC). We recruited medics with a 68W
              (Army combat medic) military occupational specialty (MOS).
              We targeted medics without special identifiers (e.g., critical
              care flight paramedic, etc.) to ensure wide applicability of   FIGURE 2  Syndaver model for cricothyrotomy placement.
              our results, but we did not exclude medics with these identifi-
              ers. We conducted most enrollment in conjunction with their
              annual MOS required training (Table VIII certification) and
              with the combat medic cadre at the Medical Center of Ex-
              cellence (MEDCOE, formerly the Army Medical Department
              Center and School).
              Enrollment
              Upon identification of potential participants, we briefed the
              medics in the designated study area. A study team member
              explained to the medics the purpose of the study and provided
              them with consent handouts. We afforded participants the
              opportunity to ask questions prior to agreeing to participate.
              Upon consent to participate, we provided them with a stan-
              dardized enrollment form (Appendix) and a data collection
              form soliciting demographics. We used www.randomizer.org
              to develop a randomization schedule in permuted blocks of
                11
              10.  We prelabeled case report forms with the intervention
              order and used these forms sequentially.
                                                                 For the purposes of data collection, we defined an attempt as
              Platform                                           insertion of the device into the oral cavity with full removal
              We used mannequins from Syndaver (https://syndaver.com/) –    prior to the next attempt. We did not consider adjustments
              adult airway  trainer  and  cricothyrotomy  trainer  (Figures  1   made upon insertion as additional attempts. Time started when
              and 2). We selected these models for two reasons. First, this   participants made a verbal queue of readiness and stopped
              is the mannequin model of choice by the advanced medic   when the participant verbally confirmed satisfaction with
              training course at the MEDCOE, including the Critical Care   placement. Study team members who were either physicians
              Flight Paramedic Program and the Expeditionary Field Medic   board certified in emergency medicine or certified registered
              program. Second, we conducted an analysis of available low-   nurse anesthetists then confirmed correct placement via direct
              fidelity (e.g., no interactive simulation) mannequins on the   visualization, ventilation, and palpation.
              market and our study team felt that this was the most realis-
              tic model. Moreover, our study team had experience with this   Cricothyrotomy
              platform, for which we received positive feedback from medics   We did not provide instructional videos on cricothyrotomy as
              during previous studies. 12                        we expected participants to have some familiarity with this
                                                                 procedure as part of their combat medic initial entry training.
              iGel                                               We provided an assortment of equipment and permitted par-
              We provided  participants  an  instructional  video from  the    ticipants to set up the equipment per their own personal pref-
              manufacturer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id   erences. Aside from this assortment of equipment, we allowed
              =annotation_903037127&feature=iv&src_vid=ao-Sb_Oul   the medics to use additional tools per their request including
              E8&v=ae1Yr0fbz98). We allowed participants to handle the   a bougie, North American Rescue cricothyrotomy kit (North
              device prior to enrollment but we did not allow them to prac-  American Rescue;  https://www.narescue.com/tactical-crickit
                                                                                            ™
                                                                                 ™
              tice attempts at placement. Upon stating they were ready for   .html), Control-Cric  (Pulmodyne ; https://www.pulmodyne
                                                                                                ™
                                                                                                               ™
              testing, we placed the iGel device next to the mannequin and   .com/control-cric),  and  QuickTrach  II   (VBM  Medical ;
              initiated time upon verbal cue by the participant.  https://www.vbm-medical.com/products/airway-management
                                                                           iGel Versus Cricothyrotomy by Combat Medics  |  69
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76