Page 69 - 2020 JSOM Winter
P. 69
17. Hartmann E, Sunde T, Kristensen W, Martinussen M. Psychologi- 28. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative
cal measures as predictors of military training performance. J Pers research. BMJ. 1995;311:109–112.
Assess. 2003;80(1):87–98. 29. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd
18. McDonald DG, Norton JP, Hodgdon JA. Training success in U.S. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
Navy Special Forces. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990;61:548–554. 30. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an ex-
19. De Beer M, van Heerden A. Exploring the role of motivational panded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publica-
and coping resources in a Special Forces selection process. SA tions; 1994.
J Ind Psychol. 2014;40(1):1–13. 31. Mattie P, Jaenen S, Collins J. Special operations mental agility
20. Manning F, Fullerton T. Health and well-being in highly cohesive training for the Canadian Operations Forces Command. J Sci
units of the U.S. Army. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1988;18(6):503–519. Med Sport. 2017;20(2S):S88.
21. Fikretoglu D, Liu A, Nazarov A, Blackler K. A group randomized 32. Lester P, Peterson K, Reeves J, et al. The long war and parental com-
control trial to test the efficacy of the road to Mental Readiness bat deployment: effects on military children and at-home spouses.
(R2MR) program among Canadian military recruits. BMC Psy- J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(4):310–320.
chiatry. 2019;19(1):1–14. 33. Dixon MA, Bares CB. Resilience in the U.S. Air Force: a factor
22. Adler AB, Bliese PD, McGurk D, Hoge CW, Castro CA. Battle- analysis of two resilience scales. Mil Behav Health. 2018;6(1):
mind debriefing and Battlemind training as early interventions 41–49.
with soldiers returning from Iraq: randomization by platoon. J 34. Rice V, Liu B. Personal resilience and coping: part II. Identifying
Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(5):928–940. resilience and coping among U.S. military service members and
23. Herzog TP, Deuster PA. Performance psychology as a key com- veterans with implications for work. Work. 2016;54(2):335–350.
ponent of human performance optimization. J Spec Oper Med. 35. Evans SE, Steeger G. Deployment-to-dwell metrics and supply
2014;14(4):99–105. based force sustainment. J Defense Analytics Logistics. 2018;2(1):
24. Ungar M. Qualitative contributions to resilience research. Qual 2–21.
Soc Work. 2003;2(1):85–102. 36. Marini CM, Wadsworth SM, Christ SL, Franks MM. Emotion
25. Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a qualitative de- expression, avoidance and psychological health during reintegra-
scription approach in health care research. Global Qual Nur Res. tion: a dyadic analysis of actor and partner associations within a
2017;4:1–8. sample of military couples. J Soc Pers Relat. 2017;34(1):69–90.
26. Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C. Characteristics of qualitative de- 37. Abt JP, Sell TC, Lovalekar M, et al. Injury epidemiology of
scriptive studies: a systematic review. Res Nurs Health. 2017;40 U.S. Army Special Operations Forces. Mil Med. 2014;179(10):
(1):23–42. 1106–1112.
27. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual
Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
JSOM JOB BOARD
Air Force
Special Tactics
Special Operations Surgical Teams, referred to as SOST, are US Air
Force teams of mobile surgical specialists with advanced medical
and tactical training devoted to saving lives, anywhere and anytime.
These specialized surgical teams provide four unique capabilities:
➤ advanced trauma resuscitation
➤ tactical damage control surgery
➤ postoperative critical care
➤ critical care evacuation
Join the Teams at: https://www.airforcespecialtactics.af.mil
/special-tactics/battlefield-surgery/
Adversity and Resilience Among Special Forces Personnel | 67

