Page 137 - 2020 JSOM Winter

81. Raman SR, Jamil Z, Cosgrove J. Magnetic resonance angiogra- 102. Shitzer A, Tikuisis P. Advances, shortcomings, and recommen-
phy unmasks frostbite injury. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(5):450. dations for wind chill estimation. Int J Biometeorol. 2012;56(3):
82. Van denWyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU, et al. The EANM 495–503.
practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol 103. Jussila K, Valkama A, Remes J, Anttonen H, Peitso A. The effect
Imaging. 2016;43:1723–1738. of cold protective clothing on comfort and perception of perfor-
83. Cauchy E, Chetaille E, Lefevre M, Kerelou E, Marsigny B. The mance. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2010;16(2):185–197.
role of bone scanning in severe frostbite of the extremities: a 104. Chen YS, Fan J, Qian X, Zhang W. Effect of garmet fit on ther-
retrospective study of 88 cases. Europ J Nucl Med. 2000;27(5): mal insulation and evaporative resistance. Textile Res J. 2004;74
497–502. (8):742–748.
84. Mehta RC, Wilson MA. Frostbite injury: prediction of tissue vi- 105. Endrusick TL. Improvement of the U.S. Army Intermediate Cold
ability with triple-phase bone scanning. Radiology. 1989;170: Wet Boot. https://ciehub.info/ref/ADP012442.pdf. Accessed 20
511–514. August 2020.
85. Kraft C, Millet JD, Agarwal S, et al. SPECT/CT in the evaluation 106. Intermediate Cold/Wet Boots. https://ciehub.info/clothing/footwear
of frostbite. J Burn Care Res. 2016;38:e227–e234. /BootsICW.html. Accessed 20 August 2020.
86. Arvensen A, Wilson J, Rosen L. Nerve conduction velocity in 107. History of Mickey Mouse Boots. https://colemans.com/surplus
human limbs with late sequelae after cold injury. Eur J Clin In- -guide/post/history-of-mickey-mouse-boots/. Accessed 19 August
vest. 1996;26:443–450. 2020.
87. Blair JR, Schatzki R, Orr KD. Sequelae to cold injury in one 108. Briggs C. Outdoor Research unveils next gen modular glove
hundred patients. JAMA. 1957;163(14):1203–1208. system. https://calibremag.ca/outdoor-research-unveils-next-gen
88. Ervasti O, Hassi J, Rintamaki H, et al. Sequelae of moderate fin- -modular-glove-system/. Accessed 20 August 2020.
ger frostbite as assessed by subjective sensations, clinical signs, 109. US Army seeks new cold weather glove system. https://soldier
and thermophysiological responses. Int J Circumpolar Health. systems.net/2019/06/12/us-army-seeks-new-cold-weather-glove
2000;59(2):137–145. -system/. Accessed 20 August 2020.
89. Taylor MS, Kulungowski MA, Hanelink JK. Frostbite injuries 110. Besnard Y, Launay JC, Guinet-Lebreton A, Savourey G. PRE-
during winter manuvers: a long-term disability. Milit Med. 1989; DICTOL: a computer program to determine the thermophysio-
154:411–412. logical duration limited exposures in various climatic conditions.
90. Arvensen A, Rosen L, Eltvik LP, Kroese A, Stranden E. Skin mi- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2004;76(3):
crocirculation in patients with sequelae from local cold injuries. 221–228.
Int J Microcirc. 1994;14:335–342. 111. Holmer I. Assessment of cold stress in terms of required clothing
91. LeBlanc J, Blais B, Barabe B, Cote J. Effects of temperature and insulation—IREQ. Int J Ind Ergon. 1988;3(2):159–166.
wind on facial temperature, heart rate, and sensation. J Appl 112. Xu X, Rioux TP, Gonzalez J, et al. Development of a cold in-
Physiol. 1976;40(2):127–131. jury prevention tool: the Cold Weather Ensemble Decision Aid
92. Danielsson U. Windchill and the risk of tissue freezing. J Appl (CoWEDA). Natick, MA: U.S.Army Research Institute of Envi-
Physiol. 1996;81(6):2666–2673. ronmental Medicine. Technical Report No. 2019; March 2019.
93. Provins KA, Morton R. Tactical discrimination and skin tem- 113. Kuklane K. Protection of feet in cold exposure. Ind Health.
perature. J Appl Physiol. 1960;15(1):155–160. 2009;47:242–253.
94. Heus R, Daanen HAM, Havenith G. Physiological criteria for 114. Potter AW, Looney DP, Santee WR, et al. Validation of a new
functioning of hands in the cold. Appl Ergon. 1995;26(1):5–13. method for predicting human skin temperature during cold ex-
95. Wilson O, Goldman RF, Molnar GW. Freezing temperature of posure: the Cold Weather Ensemble Decision Aid (CoWEDA).
finger skin. J Appl Physiol. 1976;41(4):551–558. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2020;18:100301.
96. Molnar GW, Hughes AL, Wilson O, Goldman RF. Effect of skin 115. Geurts CLM, Sleivert GG, Cheung SS. Local cold acclimation
wetting on finger cooling and freezing. J Appl Physiol. 1973;35 during exercise and its effect on neuromuscular function of the
(2):205–207. hand. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006;31:717–725.
97. Brajkovic D, Ducharme MB. Facial cold-induced vasodilation 116. Makinen TT, Gavhed D, Holmer I, Rintamaki H. Effects of met-
and skin temperature during exposure to cold wind. Eur J Appl abolic rate on the thermal responses at different air velocities at
Physiol. 2006;96:711–721. –10°C. Comp Biochem Physiol, Part A. 2001;128:759–768.
98. Gavhed D, Makinen T, Holmer I, Rintamaki H. Face tempera- 117. Gavhed D, Makinen T, Holmer I, Rintamaki H. Face cooling by
ture and cardiorespiratory responses to wind in thermoneutral wind in walking subjects. Int J Biometeorol. 2003;47:148–155.
and cool subjects exposed to –10°C. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000; 118. Dobnikar U, Kounalakis SN, Mekjavic IB. The effect of
83:449–456. exercise-induced elevation in core temperature on cold-induced
99. Bluestein M, Osczevski R. The basis for the new wind chill tem- vasodilitation responses in toes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:
perature chart. https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/48428 457–464.
.pdf. Accessed 6 August 2020. 119. Keramidas ME, Musizza B, Kounalakis SN, Mekjavic IB. En-
100. Osczevski R, Bluestein M. The new wind chill equivalent tempera- hancement of the finger cold-induced vasodilation response with
ture chart. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2005;October:1453–1458. exercise training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:133–140.
101. Kaufman WC, Bothe DJ. Wind chill reconsidered, Siple revis-
ited. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986;57(1):23–26.

Frostbite | 135