Page 101 - 2020 JSOM Winter

6. Institute for Economics & Peace. Global Terrorism Index 2019: 29. Hartley J. Mass casualty incidents and tactical medical capabil-
Measuring the Impact of Terrorism. http://visionofhumanity.org ities amongst first responders. J High Threat Austere Medicine.
/app/uploads/2019/11/GTI-2019web.pdf. Sydney, Australia: In- https://jhtam.org/index.php/JHTAM/article/view/11. February 19,
stitute for Economics & Peace; November 2019. Accessed Feb- 2019. Accessed March 22, 2020.
ruary 2020. 30. US Fire Administration. Fire/Emergency Medical Services De-
7. Ursano RJ, Fullerton CS, Weisæth L, Raphael B. Textbook of partment Operational Considerations and Guide for Active
Disaster Psychiatry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; Shooter and Mass Casualty Incidents. https://www.usfa.fema.gov
2017. /downloads/pdf/publications/active_shooter_guide.pdf. September
8. Jacobs LM, McSwain NE Jr, Rotondo MF, et al. Improving 2013. Accessed March 22, 2020.
survival from active shooter events: the Hartford Consensus. 31. Schwartz J. “Rescue Task Force.” Urban Fire Forum, September
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(6):1399–1400. 13, 2013. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
9. Martín-Ibáñez L, Pérez-Martínez J, Zamora-Mínguez D, et al. A 32. National Fire Protection Association. UFF Position Statement:
civilian tactical survival chain for incidents involving multiple in- Active Shooter and Mass Casualty Terrorist Events. https://www
tentional injury victims: the Victory I Consensus Report. [Article .nfpa.org/-/media/Files/Membership/member-sections/Metro
in Spanish] Emergencias. 2019;31:195–201. -Chiefs/UFFActiveShooterPositionStatement.ashx?la=en. Septem-
10. Martin L, Roca G, Hernandez JM, Fernandez S, Lynam B. Vic- ber 16, 2013. Accessed March 22, 2020.
tory I Consensus document: proposal for the implementation of
the Hartford Doctrine in the Spanish context. J Spec Oper Med.
2018;18(4):27–29.
11. Heiskell LE, Carmona RH. Tactical emergency medical services:
an emerging subspecialty of emergency medicine. Ann Emerg
Med. 1994;23(4):778–785.
12. Iselin B. Arlington County, Va., Task Force Rethinks Active
Shooter Incident Response. https://www.jems.com/2009/11/30
/arlington-county-va-task-force/. November 30, 2009. Accessed
March 22, 2020.
13. McArdle DQ, Rasumoff D, Kolman J. Integration of emergency
medical services and Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams:
the emergence of the tactically trained medic. Prehosp Disaster
Med. 1992;7(3):285–288.
14. Heck JJ, Pierluisi G, Operational EMS-TEMS Task Force. Law
enforcement special operations medical support. Prehosp Emerg
Care. 2001;5(4):403–406.
15. Young JB, Sena MJ, Galante JM. Physician roles in tactical emer-
gency medical support: the first 20 years. J Emerg Med. 2014;46
(1):38–45.
16. Schwartz R, Lerner B, Llwewllyn C, et al. Development of a
National Consensus for Tactical Emergency Medical Support
(TEMS) training programs—operators and medical providers.
J Spec Oper Med. 2014;14(2):122–138.
17. Eastridge BJ, Holcomb JB, Shackelford S. Outcomes of traumatic
hemorrhagic shock and the epidemiology of preventable death
from injury. Transfusion. 2019;59:1423-1428.
18. Jacobs LM Jr. Joint Committee to Create a National Policy to En-
hance Survivability from Mass Casualty Shooting Events: Hart-
ford Consensus II. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):476–478.
19. Sala Sanjaume J, Morales Álvarez J, Castillo Paramio X. August
17: first reflections after the terrorist attack in Barcelona. [Article
in Spanish.] Emergencias. 2017;29(5):301–302.
20. Garavalia L, Gredler M. Teaching evaluation through modeling:
using the Delphi technique to assess problems in academia pro-
grams. Am J Eval. 2004;25 (3):375–380.
21. Landeta J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences.
Technological ForecastingSocial Change. 2006;73:467–482.
22. Yañez-Gallardo R, Cuadra-Olmos R. [La técnica Delphi y la in-
vestigación en los servicios de salud.] Ciencia y Enfermería. 2008;
14(1):9–15.
23. Okoli C, Pawlowski S. The Delphi method as a research tool:
an example, design considerations and applications. Information
Management. 2004;42(1):15–29.
24. Kennedy HP. Enhancing Delphi research: methods and results.
J Adv Nurs. 2004;45(5):504–511.
25. Price B. Delphi survey research and older people. Nurs Older
People. 2005;17(3):25–31.
26. Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, et al. Defining consensus:
a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for report-
ing of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–409.
27. Trevelyan EG, Robinson PN. Delphi methodology in health re-
search: how to do it? Eur J Integr Med. 2015;7(4):423–428.
28. Díaz-Portillo J. [Guía práctica de lectura crítica de artículos
científicos originales en Ciencias de la Salud.] Madrid: Instituto
Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria; 2012. https://www.sepeap.org
/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Guia_practica_de_lectura.pdf.

Spanish Intentional Mass-Casualty Incidents Medical Response | 99