Page 27 - JSOM Fall 2020
P. 27

TABLE 2  Cont.
                                                      Rewarming   Level of
                           Prehospital    Reference   Effectiveness  Evidence a          Comments
                        HPMK           Allen et al. 61   √√√        C    Prospective randomized study. Did not use human
                                                                         volunteers, but simulated torso with fluid bladder
                                                                         system. Effective outcome compared with all active
                                                                         heating systems studied.
                                                                         CoTCCC, JTTS, and DoD preferred system since
                                                                         2006; outer vapor-barrier garment and 10-hour
                                                                         (110°F) chemical blanket; low cost, weight, and size;
                                                                         effective system only for short-term use due to lack of
                                                                         insulation; patients will get cold in <60 min; use in cold
                                                                         environments 22
                        Improvised     Dutta et al. 22  √√√√        B    Randomized controlled study with human volunteers.
                        hypothermia wrap                                 The user-assembled and Doctor Down systems were
                        (user-assembled                                  most effective.
              Active    system)
              Rewarming   Doctor Down   Dutta et al. 22  √√√√       B
              Methods   Rescue Wrap
              (cont.)
                        HPMK           Dutta et al. 22   √√         B    Randomized control study with human volunteers.
                                                                         HPMK was least effective because of lack of insulation.
                        MARSARS        Dutta et al. 22   √√√        B    Randomized control study with human volunteers.
                        Hypothermia                                      These two systems were not as effective for retaining
                        Stabilizer Bag                                   thermal balance when compared with the DD and user-
                                                                         assembled system systems.
                        Wiggy’s Victim   Dutta et al. 22  √√√       B
                        Casualty Bag
                        Ready-Heat     Phillips et al. 77  √√√      C    Single case report with high efficiency to rewarm
                        Blanket and                                      patient
                        PrimaLoft synthetic
                        sleeping bag
                        hypothermia wrap
              Abbreviations: √, mildly effective; √√, moderately effective; √√√, highly effective; BB, Blizzard Blanket; CoTCCC, Committee on Tactical Com-
              bat Casualty Care; DoD, Department of Defense; HP, Hot Pocket; HRP, human remains pouch; HRS, heat-reflective shell; IO, intraosseous;
              IV, intravenous; JTTS, Joint Theater Trauma System; MEDEVAC, medical evacuation; NE, not effective; SB, space blanket; WB, wool blanket.
              a Level A: Evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses. Level B: Evidence from a single randomized trial or non-randomized
              studies. Level C: Expert opinion, case studies, or standards of care. 70

              of an outer layer (e.g., a tarp), ground insulation pad(s), and   underwear with a vapor barrier wrapped around the manikin;
              one to three sleeping bags. When multiple sleeping bags are   and (5) no underwear. Heat loss and thermal resistance were
              available, each bag should be placed within each other to cre-  determined from continuous monitoring of ambient air tem-
              ate a multilayered insulation with the patient placed inside the   perature, manikin surface temperature, heat flux, and evapo-
              innermost bag. For maximum insulation around the patient,   rative mass loss rate. The authors reported that independent
              each bag should be completely zipped up to prevent any cold   of insulation thickness or ambient temperature, the removal
              spots on the sides of the bags, and an outer waterproof layer   of wet clothing or the addition of a vapor barrier over the wet
              wrapped around all layers to prevent body heat loss while   clothing resulted in a reduction in total heat loss of 19% to
              blocking wind and moisture entry. 17               42%. These findings were subsequently validated in human
                                                                 volunteers and confirmed equal benefit for either removing
              When hypothermic patients (core temperature <28°C [82.4°F])   wet clothing and providing one blanket for insulation, or leav-
              are below the thermoregulatory threshold for shivering (~30°C   ing wet clothes intact and wrapping a vapor barrier around
              [86°F]), shivering heat production ceases. 23,25  Thus, these pri-  the patient. These two-treatment conditions both significantly
              mary hypothermic patients will continue to cool, and they can-  decreased  metabolic  rate,  increased  skin  temperature,  and
              not warm up spontaneously without external heat, even if they   decreased shivering thermogenesis, resulting in an overall im-
              are well insulated from the environment; this is especially true   provement of the patient’s thermal stress. 66
              for trauma patients. During prehospital trauma management,
              the administration of pain medications, such as ketamine, opi-  Given this evidence, prompt treatment with active rewarming
              oids, and benzodiazepines, per TCCC guidelines, may abol-  is now recommended in both Prehospital Trauma Life Support
              ish shivering, which can further exacerbate the magnitude of   (civilian and military versions) and Advance Trauma Life Sup-
              hypothermia. 71,72                                 port trauma management guidelines. 73,74

              The benefits of removing wet clothing and improving thermal   Q1. Is adding an external heat source to a hypothermia
              balance were reported in a study that used a thermal manikin   wrap effective?
              to evaluate three different insulation ensembles consisting of   Many studies have evaluated the effectiveness of external heat
              one, two, or seven wool blankets.  Additionally, five different   sources in transferring heat to the body. 17,57  A variety of heat
                                        65
              test conditions were evaluated for all three levels of insula-  sources have been reviewed, including electrical and chemical
              tion: (1) dry underwear; (2) dry underwear with a vapor bar-  heating pads/blankets of various sizes, warmed water bottles,
              rier wrapped around the manikin; (3) wet underwear; (4) wet   hot water bottles or bags, charcoal-burning heat packs, and

                                                                Management of Hypothermia in Tactical Combat Casualty Care  |  25
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32