Page 166 - JSOM Fall 2020
P. 166

FIGURE 8  Adhesion data of adhesive technology under different   FIGURE 10  Adhesion data of adhesive technology under dirty, dry,
          environmental conditions on human volunteers: ambient room   and sweaty conditions on human volunteers.
          temperature (23 ± 2°C), a cold environment (at least –5°C), and a
          warm environment (40 ± 2°C).













                                                             FIGURE 11  Back pressure of vent unhindered and occluded with
                                                             varying levels of airflow.



          FIGURE 9  Adhesion data of adhesive technology under dry and
          sweaty conditions on human volunteers.
















          When assessed on healthy volunteers, the increase in moisture   FIGURE 12  Back pressure of vent unhindered and under standard
          on and within the skin does not appear to have any detrimen-  UK military equipment and armor.
          tal effect on the adhesive profile of the adhesive technology
          (Figure 10).

          The data for dirty skin under dry and sweaty conditions also
          showed no detrimental effect on the adhesive properties of the
          adhesive technology.

          Vent Profiling
          Flow/Pressure Profile With and Without Vents
          Partially Blocked
          The data within (Figure 11) indicate that even with half the
          vents occluded, the new design of test article allows effective
          use of the vent system. The increased air volume within the
          pleural cavity does result in a slight increase in back pressure
          caused by the vents but does not cause the vents to fail.
                                                             Channel Failure on Concave and Convex Surfaces
          Pressure/Flow Profile Under Military Equipment     When applied to both concave and convex surfaces, the ability
          The data within (Figure 12) indicates that the vent system con-  of the vent to hold a negative pressure over 3 seconds and not
          tinues to operate effectively under equipment and armor, when   hold positive pressure was assessed; at no point did the dress-
          applied under predicted normal conditions. The increased air   ing function fail.
          volume within the pleural cavity does result in a slight increase
          in back pressure caused by the vents, as does the application of   Discussion
          the armor and equipment over the test article.
                                                             The main complication associated with the use of an open
          Flow/Valve Function Over the Full Wear Time        pneumothorax dressing is the development of tension pneu-
          The ability of the vent to hold a negative pressure over 3 sec-  mothorax.  The use of a vented chest seal dressing may pre-
                                                                     14
          onds and not hold positive pressure was assessed over a 48-  vent this from occurring. To ensure the design of the vented
          hour period at various timepoints; at no point did the dressing   chest seal dressing is optimal and reduces the risk of further
          function fail.                                     complications related to product failure, two key elements of


          164  |  JSOM   Volume 20, Edition 3 / Fall 2020
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171