Page 46 - JSOM Spring 2020

UAV disadvantages are; battlespace space management con- Disclosure
cerns, parabolic munition avoidance, cyber-attack, user-ac- The author has nothing to disclose, and has no declared con-
ceptance, navigation and security issues. However, hardened flicts of interest.
intelligent navigation systems like those used on Predator
drones and Tomahawk cruise missiles (TERCOM [Terrain References
Contour Matching], DSMAC [Digital Scene Matching Area 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_TDR. Accessed 5 August
Correlation and Radar Altimetry]) will help. UAVs are pro- 2019.
tected by the Geneva Convention but for some opposing 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Model_147. Accessed 5 August
2019.
forces, this may be a fine distinction. End user acceptability is 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrodyne_QH-50_DASH. Accessed
one for our senior commanders. 5 August 2019.
4. https://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/dash-goes-to
In summary, the level of care delivered within the medical UAV -war-23369442/. Accessed 5 August 2019.
will be our responsibility. Drones provide both challenges and 5. Handford C, Reeves F, Parker PJ. Prospective use of Unmanned
opportunities for us. UAV CASEVAC is coming. When Skynet Aerial Vehicles for Military Medical Evacuation in Future Con-
flicts. J R Army Med Corps 2018;164(4):293–296.
became self-aware in Terminator 1, Hunter-Killer drones were 6. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/technology-40360164/the
the enemy. Now like Terminator 2, they are on our side. We -defibrillator-drone-that-can-beat-ambulance-times. Accessed 5
must be ready. August 2019.
7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipline_(drone_delivery). Accessed
5 August 2019.
8. Mesar T, Lessig A, King DR. Use of Drone Technology for Deliv-
ery of Medical Supplies During Prolonged Field Care. J Spec Oper
Med. Winter 2018;18(4):34-35.
9. Nato Standard AJP-4.10 Allied Joint Doctrine for Medical Sup-
port Edition B Version 1 With UK National Elements. May 2015.
DCDC, Ministry of Defence, UK.
10. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/publications/icrc-002
-0173.pdf. Accessed 5 August 2019.
11. https://publicintelligence.net/dod-unmanned-systems-2013/. Ac-
cessed 5 August 2019.
12. Lam D, Gilbert G, Beebe M. Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Ca-
sualty Evacuation: What Needs to Be Done. Neuilly-Sur-Seine
Cedex, France: NATO Science and Technology Organization;
December 2012:2.
13. NATO Science and Technology Organization. Safe Ride Stan-
dards for Casualty Evacuation Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
Neuilly-Sur-Seine Cedex, France: NATO Science and Technology
Organization; December 2012:10-1.
14. http://www.dragonflypictures.com/products/unmanned-vehicles
/dp-14-hawk/. Accessed 5 August 2019.
15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_Aeronautics_AirMule. Accessed
5 August 2019.
16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_V-247_Vigilant. Accessed 5 Au-
gust 2019.
17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_V-280_Valor. Accessed 5 Au-
gust 2019.
18. https://phys.org/news/2005-03-trauma-pod-robot-soldiers
-battlefield.html. Accessed 5 August 2019.
19. Rall JM, Redman TT, Ross EM, et al. Comparison of zone 3
resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and the
Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet in a model of junc-
tional hemorrhage in swine. J Surg Res. 2018;226:31–39.

42 | JSOM Volume 20, Edition 1 / Spring 2020