Page 101 - JSOM Spring 2020
P. 101

8 weeks of US Army Ranger training reportedly decreased   production of testosterone in the Leydig cells of the testes. As
              body mass, fat mass, and lean body mass, with reductions in   levels of testosterone increase, the levels of testosterone inhibit
              field measures of strength and power of 16–21%.  However,   the release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, LH, and FSH
                                                     2
              SOF training durations as few as 3 days have been reported to   via negative feedback systems.
              markedly alter body composition and musculoskeletal function
              (Table 1).                                         Synthetic derivatives of testosterone, known as anabolic an-
                                                                 drogenic steroids (AAS), were developed in East Germany and
              Available research on military personnel during SOF training   later  in  the  United  States.  AAS  are  principally  testosterone
              focusing on the 72 hours of training exposure shows decreases   molecules that have been modified in the 17α-carbon posi-
              in LBM, diminished muscular function, and decreased tes-  tion, affecting liver metabolism of the compound, as well as
              tosterone levels (Table 1). The reductions in testosterone ap-  the half-life, potency, and toxicity of the synthetic compound.
              pear to be the additive effects of very high physical demand,   AAS bind to androgen receptors, stimulate the actions of tes-
              reduced caloric intake, a negative caloric balance, and sleep   tosterone, and vary in delivery vehicle from oral and transder-
              deprivation. Each of these factors has separately been shown   mal to injectable forms.
              to reduce testosterone. Collectively, the resulting reduction in
              functional capacity during SOF training likely occurs during   Therapeutic Testosterone Therapy
              SUSOPS  and  may  impair  mission  success  and  endanger  the   Exogenous testosterone therapy has shown modest benefits
              safety of personnel. It is theorized that use of exogenous tes-  in antiaging research as well as in combating type 2 diabetes
              tosterone therapy in military personnel during SUSOPS is   and Alzheimer disease. Men typically experience reductions
              consistent with its use in patients suffering from wasting dis-  in testosterone as a function of aging, resulting in low levels
              eases or low LBM. During SUSOPS, the effects of physically   of LBM, type 2 diabetics normally have not only obesity but
              demanding conditions, injury, a negative energy balance, and   also lower levels of LBM. In addition, individuals living with
              sleep deprivation may be attenuated by the use of supplemen-  human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection typically have
              tal testosterone, which may provide greater likelihood of mis-  low testosterone levels and may be treated with testosterone
              sion success.                                      to combat fatigue.  In the case of HIV-positive patients, it is
                                                                               18
                                                                 likely that fatigue is at least in part related to decreased LBM
              Understanding that SOF’s initial and sustainment training is   impairing normal activities of daily living.
              physiologically demanding, can the use of testosterone supple-
              mentation offset the adverse effects on body composition and   Studies investigating the effects of testosterone or AAS on
              muscle function experienced throughout an Operator’s career?  skeletal muscle function have overwhelming used male sub-
                                                                 jects. This is due to the potential unwanted androgenic effects
                                                                 resulting in masculinization in females. Most studies using
              Background
                                                                 exogenous testosterone without the addition of resistance
              Testosterone Biochemistry                          training 19–27  generally used subjects who were older than 40
              Testosterone is a steroid (lipid-based) hormone that has both   years (mean age 46.3 years) (Table 2). However, male subjects
              androgenic and anabolic effects.  The anabolic effect  of tes-  in their 20s to 30s were more commonly studied 28–34  when re-
              tosterone is principally the stimulation of protein synthe-  sistance training was combined with exogenous testosterone
              sis in muscle and bone, whereas the androgenic effects are   treatment (Table 3).
              the secondary sex characteristics (e.g., body hair, deepening
              of the voice, and male reproductive function). The produc-  As summarized in Tables 2 and 3, exogenous testosterone or
              tion of testosterone is regulated by the hypothalamic-pitu-  AAS has been administered for as few as 4 weeks  or up to 24
                                                                                                      23
              itary-gonadal (HPG) axis. When testosterone levels are low,   months. 19,22  The average dosage used in studies investigating
              the hypothalamus releases gonadotropin-releasing hormone,   exogenous  testosterone  treatment  was ~250–300mg  weekly,
              which stimulates the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and   for an average of 35–40 weeks (Tables 2 and 3). Dosages of
              follicle-stimulating  hormone  (FSH).  LH  and  FSH  stimulate   AAS do not correlate directly with testosterone dosages and

              TABLE 1  Effects of Special Operations Training on Lean Body Mass and Muscle Strength
                              Subjects                                                                   %Δ
                                        Duration   EE      EI     Energy   Sleep   %Δ     Δ BM   %Δ    Lower Body
              Source        Age (y)  n   (days)  (kcal/day)  (kcal/day)  Balance  (h/day) Testosterone  (kg)  LBM  Strength/Power
              Nindl 6       22 ± 3  14     3      4,500   1,600   –2,900   3.6            –2.5  –2.3     –6.3
              Morgan 11    28.8 ± 5  124  ~3                                       –43
              Gomez-Merino 7  21 ± 2  26   5              3,200                    –35
              Vaara 8               52     5                                       –47    –1.6
              Aakvaag       22–25    8     6     10,960   1,600   –9,360   2       –84    –4             –8.9
              Welsh         24 ± 1  29     8      3,834   1,540   –2,294  NA       NA     –4.1  –2.4
                                                 7,000–           4,000–
              Kyröoläinen   24 ± 2  10    5–20            3,000                           –4.2  –3.4
                                                  3,000           1,000
              Friedl 13                   96      4,000   2,800   –1,200   3.6     –88   –12.1  –7.3
              Friedl 13                   96      4,200   3,200   –1,000   3.6     –88   –10    –6.1
              Nindl 5      24.6 ± 4.4  50  96                              2       –83   –10    –6.1    –20.0
              Mean                        39.4   5,498.8  2,420   –3,351   3.0     –63    –6.1  –4.6    –11.7
              Abbreviations: Δ, change; NA, not available.

                                                                             Testosterone, Lean Body Mass, and Strength  |  95
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106