Page 112 - JSOM Fall 2019
P. 112

An Ongoing Series



                                 United States Military Parachute Injuries

                    Part 1: Early Airborne History and Secular Trends in Injury Incidence



                                                 Joseph J. Knapik, ScD






          ABSTRACT

          This article traces the early history of military airborne op-  Keywords: injury incidence; parachute; history; risk factors
          erations and examines studies that have provided overall in-
          cidences of parachute-related injuries over time. The first US
          combat parachute assault was proposed during World War I,   Introduction
          but the war ended before the operation could be conducted.
          Experimental jumps were conducted near San Antonio, Texas,   In the United States, organized military airborne training has
          in 1928 and 1929, but it was not until 1939, spurred by the   been conducted since 1940. From this time to the present, ar-
          developments in Germany, that the US Army Chief of Infantry   ticles  have  been  published  in  the  medical  literature  describ-
          proposed the development of an “air infantry.” An Airborne   ing injuries and fatalities occurring during training and more
          Test Platoon was instituted with 48 men at Fort Benning, Geor-  recently during combat operations. Medical personnel have
          gia, and mass training of paratroopers began in 1940. The US   worked with leaders, trainers, and safety personnel to reduce
          entered World War II in December 1941 with the attack on   the risks in airborne operations by examining the hazards in-
          Pearl Harbor and declaration of war by Germany. In Janu-  volved and developing interventions to reduce these hazards
          ary 1942, US War Department directed that four parachute   through modifications in equipment and techniques.
          regiments be formed. The 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion
          made the first US Army combat jumps into Morocco and Al-  This article is part 1 of a two-part series. Part 1 will briefly
          geria in November 1942. At the US Army Airborne School in   review the early history of airborne operation (prior to and
          the 1940–1941 period, the parachute-related injury incidence   during World War II) and then describe historical trends in in-
          was 27 injuries/1000 jumps; by 1993 it was 10 injuries/1000   jury incidence from the inception of US airborne training and
          jumps and in 2005–2006, 6 injuries/1000 jumps. Analysis of   operations to the present. Part 2 will discuss interventions that
          time-loss injuries in operational units showed a decline in inju-  were associated with the decline in parachute-related injury
          ries from 6 injuries/1000 jumps to 3 injuries/1000 jumps to 1   rates over time.
          injury/1000 jumps in the periods 1946–1949, 1956–1962, and
          1962–1963, respectively. When all injuries (not just time-loss)   Early History of Military Airborne Operations
          experienced in operational units are considered, the overall
          injury incidence was about 8 injuries/1000 jumps in the 1993–  Benjamin Franklin is often credited to have been the first to
          2013 period. In jump operations involving a larger number of   propose the use of parachutes for military operations. Inspired
          risk factors (e.g., high winds, combat loads, rough drop zones)   by Etienne Montgolfier’s hot air balloon flight he wrote in
          injury incidences was considerably higher. The few studies that   1784: “Where is the prince who can afford so to cover his
          have reported on parachute-related injuries in combat oper-  country with troops for its defense, so that ten thousand men
          ations suggest injury incidence ranged from 19 to 401 inju-  descending from the clouds might not, in many places, do an
          ries/1000 jumps, likely because of the number of known injury   infinite amount of mischief before a force could be brought
          risk factors present during these jumps. Despite the limitations   to repel them?” Napoleon Bonaparte conceived a plan to in-
          of this analysis stemming from different injury definitions and   vade England using balloon troops. However, it was not until
          variable  risk  factors,  the  data  strongly  suggest  that  military   World War I that the technology existed to make this a more
          parachute injuries have sharply declined over time. Part 2 of   realistic possibility. Colonel Billy Mitchell, commander of US
          this series will discuss techniques and equipment that have   aviation units in France, proposed an airborne parachute as-
          likely improved the safety of parachute operations.  sault in October 1918 to break the stalemate that had been
          Correspondence to joseph.knapik@JSOMonline.org
          MAJ (Ret) Knapik served in the US military as a wheel vehicle mechanic, medic, Medical Service Corps officer, and Department of Defense civil-
          ian. He is currently a senior epidemiologist/research physiologist with the Henry M. Jackson Foundation and an adjunct professor at Uniformed
          Services University (Bethesda, MD) and Bond University (Robina, Australia).

                                                          110
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117