Page 20 - JSOM Winter 2018
P. 20

Larger-Caliber Alternative Devices for Decompression of
                 Tension Hemopneumothorax in the Setting of Hemorrhagic Shock




                  Christian S. McEvoy, MD, MPH *; Matthew L. Leatherman, DO ; Jenny M. Held, MD ;
                                                                                                    1
                                                                               1
                                                1
                            Laura M. Fluke, DO ; Robert L. Ricca, MD ; Travis M. Polk, MD 1,2
                                                1
                                                                     1


          ABSTRACT
          Background: The 14-gauge (14G) angiocatheter (AC) has an   on early recognition and rapid thoracic decompression. The
          unacceptably high failure rate in treatment of tension pneumo-  current standard for emergent treatment is needle thoracos-
          thorax (tPTX). Little is known regarding the interplay among   tomy (NT) with a 14G AC in the second intercostal space at
          hemorrhage, hemothorax (HTX), and tPTX. We hypothesized   the midclavicular line. 5,6,8
          that increased hemorrhage predisposes tension physiology and
          that needle decompression fails more often with increased   Failure rates for 14G AC NT are unacceptably high, ranging
          HTX. Methods: This is a planned secondary analysis of data   from 17% to 60% in various animal, cadaver, radiographic,
          from our recent comparison of 14G AC with 10-gauge (10G)   and human series. 8–13  Failure may result from inadequate de-
          AC, modified 14G Veress needle, and 3mm laparoscopic tro-  compression, improper placement, kinking, or dislodgement,
          car conducted in a positive pressure ventilation tension hemo-  as well as contributory device characteristics including length,
          pneumothorax model using anesthetized swine. Susceptibility   rigidity, and caliber. 11,14–17  A need for an alternative device that
          to tension physiology was extrapolated from volume of carbon   mitigates these potential etiologies of decompression failure
          dioxide (CO ) instilled and time required to induce 50% re-  has been recognized. 9,10,14,15,18,19
                    2
          duction in cardiac output. Failures to rescue and recover were
          compared between the 10% and 20% estimated blood volume   Several solutions have been proposed, including use of an ax-
          (EBV) HTX groups and across devices. Results: A total of 196   illary needle decompression site,  use of longer catheters  or
                                                                                                          17
                                                                                      20
          tension hemopneumothorax events were evaluated. No differ-  larger-caliber catheters, 9,18,19  and more-rigid devices that are
          ences were noted in the volume of CO  instilled nor time to   less prone to kinking. 9,10,19  In fact, the longer 8cm (3.25 in)
                                         2
          tension physiology. HTX with 10% EBV had fewer failures   AC is now considered the standard of care, 12,21–26  and the fifth
          compared with 20% HTX (7% versus 23%; p = .002). For   intercostal space at the anterior axillary line is considered an
          larger-caliber devices, there was no difference between HTX   acceptable site for NT, because of thinner chest wall thick-
          groups, whereas smaller-caliber devices had more failures and   ness, improved provider accuracy and confidence, 20,23,25–27  and
          longer time to rescue with increased HTX volume as well as   a lower rate of dislodgement with patient movement. 15
          increased variability in times to rescue in both HTX volume
          groups. Conclusion: Increased HTX volume did not predis-  Traumatic pneumothoraces are injuries that rarely occur in
          pose tension physiology; however, smaller-caliber devices were   isolation and associated hemothoraces are reported to occur
                                                                                                    16
          associated with more failures and longer times to rescue in   after thoracic trauma in as many as 80% of cases.  Likewise,
          20% HTX as compared with 10% HTX. Use of larger devices   other sources of systemic hemorrhage in the patient with
          for decompression has benefit and further study with more   polytrauma are common. Little is known regarding the per-
          profound hemorrhage and HTX and spontaneous breathing   formance of the standard 14G AC or any of the proposed al-
          models is warranted.                               ternative decompression devices for treatment of tPTX with a
                                                             concomitant HTX or systemic hemorrhage.
          Keywords: tension pneumothorax; needle decompression;
          needle thoracostomy; trauma; prehospital care; hemothorax  Previously suggested alternatives to the 14G AC include a
                                                             modified 14G Veress-type needle (mVN), laparoscopic trocar
                                                             (LT), and 10G AC. Using a positive-pressure ventilation York-
          Introduction                                       shire swine model, our laboratory recently conducted a com-
                                                             prehensive, randomized comparison of multiple alternative
          Tension pneumothorax (tPTX) is a potentially treatable cause   decompression devices for tension hemopneumothorax (t-H/
          of death across military and civilian spectrums of care, with a   PTX) and tension-induced pulseless electrical activity (PEA).
          reported incidence of 1% to 5%.  Patient survival depends   In this study, we found that the 14G mVN performed similarly
                                    1–4
          *Correspondence to LT Christian S. McEvoy, MD, MPH, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, 620 John Paul Jones Circle, Portsmouth, VA
          23708; or christian.s.mcevoy.mil@mail.mil
          1 LT McEvoy, MC, USN; LT Leatherman, MC, USN; LT Held, MC, USN; LT Fluke, MC, USN; CAPT Ricca, MC, USN; and CDR Polk, MC,
          USN, all are at Department of Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA.  CDR Polk also is at Navy Trauma Training Center,
                                                                          2
          Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
                                                           18
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25