Page 30 - JSOM Winter 2017

49. Stockinger ZT, McSwain NE Jr. Prehospital endotracheal intuba- 69. Joly N, Poulin LP, Tanoubi I, et al. Randomized prospective trial
tion for trauma does not improve survival over bag-valve-mask comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel and LMA-Su-
™
™
ventilation. J Trauma. 2004;56:531–536. preme in paralyzed patients. Can J Anesth. 2014;61:794–800.
50. Haltmeier T, Benjamin E, Siboni S, et al. rehospital intubation for 70. Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, et al. Oesophageal seal of
isolated severe blunt traumatic brain injury: worse outcomes and the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with
higher mortality. 2016. [Epub ahead of print] the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver
51. Mabry RL, Edens JW, Pearse L, et al. Fatal airway injuries dur- model. 2009;102:135–139.
ing Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. 71. Polat R, Aydin GB, Ergil J, et al. Comparison of the i-gel and
™
™
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14:272–277. the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic in terms of clinical perfor-
52. Holcomb JB, McMullen NR, Pearse L, et al. Causes of death in mance. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2015;65:343–348.
Special Operations Forces in the Global War on Terror. Ann Surg. 72. Kömür E, Bakan N, Tomruk SG, et al. Comparison of the supraglot-
2007;245:986–991. tic airway devices Classic, Fastrach and Supreme Laryngeal Mask
53. Gahan K, Studnek JR, Vandeventer S. King LT-D use by urban ba- Airway: a prospective randomised clinical trial of efficacy, safety
sic life support first responders as the primary airway device for and complications. Turk J Anaesth Reanim. 2015;43:406–411.
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011;82:1525–1528. 73. Ragazzi R, Finessi L, Farinelli I, et al. LMA Supreme vs I-Gel: a
54. Schalte G, Stoppe C, Aktas M, et al. Laypersons can successfully comparison of insertion success. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:384–388.
place supraglottic airways with 3 minutes of training: a compari- 74. CoTCCC. Meeting Minutes 1702. https://www.jsomonline.org
son of four different devices in the manikin. Scand J Trauma Re- /TCCC/04%20CoTCCC%20Meeting%20Minutes
susc Emerg Med. 2011;19:60–67. /CoTCCC%20Meeting%20Minutes%201702.pdf. Accessed 20
55. Burns JB, Branson R, Barnes SL, et al. Emergency airway place- September 2017.
ment by EMS providers: comparison between the King LT supra- 75. Butler FK, Giebner SD, McSwain N, et al., eds: Prehospital
laryngeal airway and endotracheal intubation. Prehosp Disaster Trauma Life Support Manual; Eighth Edition – Military Version.
Med. 2010;25:92–95. Burlington, MA; Jones and Bartlett Learning; November 2014.
56. Jenkinson A, Crosher R, Mohammed-Ali R, et al. Lingual nerve 76. Tactical Combat Casualty Care Curriculum. 2016; Tactical
injury following use of a supraglottic airway device. Br J Oral Field Care. http://www.naemt.org/education/TCCC/guidelines
Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:279–280. _curriculum. Accessed 30 May 2017.
57. Rujirojindakul P, Prechawai C, Watanayomnaporn E. Tongue 77. Baratto F, Gabellini G, Paoli A, et al. I-gel O resus pack, a rescue
2
numbness following laryngeal mask airway Supreme and i-gel in- device in case of severe facial injury and difficult intubation. Am
™
™
sertion: two case reports. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2012;56:1200–1203. J Emerg Med. 2017. [Epub ahead of print].
58. Lowinger D, Benjamin B, Gadd L. Recurrent laryngeal nerve in- 78. Vithalani V, Vlk S, David S, et al. Unrecognized failed airway
jury caused by a laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care. management using a supraglottic airway device. Resuscitation.
1999;27:202–205. 2017;Epub ahead of print
59. Miyashiro RM, Yamamoto LG. Endotracheal tube and laryngeal 79. Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, et al. Scientific evidence underly-
mask airway cuff pressures can exceed critical values during as- ing the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009;301:
cent to higher altitude. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:367–370. 831–841.
60. Wilson GD, Sittig SE, Schears GJ. The laryngeal mask at altitude. 80. Chou D, Harada M, Barmparas G, et al. Field intubation in ci-
J Emerg Med. 2008;34:171–174. vilian patients with hemorrhagic shock is associated with higher
61. Law J, , Bair A, Capra J, et al. Characterization of airway de- mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:278–282.
vice cuff volumes at simulated altitude. Aviat Space Environ Med. 81. Davis DP, Dunford JV, Poste JC, et al. The impact of hypoxia
2011;82:555–558. and hyperventilation on outcome after paramedic rapid sequence
62. Air Force Instruction 48-307, Vol 1. 9 January 2017. Page 76. intubation of severely head-injured patients. J Trauma. 2004;57:
63. Hernandez MR, Klock A, Ovassapian A. Evolution of the extra- 1–10.
glottic airway: a review of its history, applications and practical
tips for success. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:349–368. Disclaimers
64. Chen X, Jiaoj J, Cong X, et al. Comparison of the performance The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private
of the I-gel vs. the LMA-s during anesthesia: a meta-analysis of views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or
randomized controlled trials. PLos ONE. 2013;8:1–8.
65. Taxak S, Gopinath A, Saini S, et al. A prospective study to evalu- as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the
ate and compare laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and I-gel airway Department of Defense. This recommendation is intended to
in the prone position. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015;9:446–450. be a guideline only and is not a substitute for clinical judgment.
66. Radhika KS, Sripriya R, Ravishankar M, et al. Assessment of
suitability of i-gel and laryngeal mask airway-supreme for con- Disclosures
trolled ventilation in anesthetized paralyzed patients: a prospec- The authors have no disclosures.
tive randomized trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10:88–93.
67. Middleton PM, Simpson PM, Thomas RE, et al. Higher insertion
success with the i-gel supraglottic airway in out-of-hospital car- Release
diac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2014; This document was reviewed by the Director of the Joint
85:893–897. Trauma System and by the Public Affairs Office and the Op-
68. Lai C, Liu C, Wu C, et al. I-Gel is a suitable alternative to endo- erational Security Office at the US Army Institute of Surgical
tracheal tubes in the laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum and Tren- Research. It is approved for unlimited public release.
delenburg position. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:3.

28 | JSOM Volume 17, Edition 4/Winter 2017