Page 29 - JSOM Winter 2017
P. 29

References                                         25.  Gupta B, Gupta S, Hilam B, et al. Comparison of three supra-
                1.  Shavit I, Aviram E, Hoffmann Y, et al. Laryngeal mask airway as   glottic airway devices for airway rescue in the prone position: a
                 a rescue device for failed endotracheal intubation during scene-  manikin-based study. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2015;8:188–192.
                 to-hospital air transport of combat casualties. Eur J Emerg Med.   26.  Ohchi F, Komasawa N, Imagawa K, et al. Evaluation of the effi-
                 2017. [Epub ahead of print]                        cacy of six supraglottic devices for airway management in devices
                2.  Gill RK, Tarat A, Pathak D, et al. Comparative study of two la-  airway management in dark conditions: a crossover randomized
                 ryngeal mask airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Su-  simulation trial. J Anesth. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
                 preme Laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized paralyzed adults   27.  Reza Hashemian SM, Nouraei N, Razavi SS, et al. Comparison
                 undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Essay Res. 2017;11:23–27.   of i–gel  and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed
                                                                         ™
                3.  van Tulder R, Schriefl C, Roth D, et al. Laryngeal tube practice in   patients. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014;4:288–292.
                 a metropolitan ambulance service: a five-year retrospective obser-  28.  Atef HM, Helmy AM, El-Taher EM, et al. Comparative study
                 vational study (2009-2013). Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016. [Epub   between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical
                 ahead of print]                                    laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated
                4.  Das A, Majumdar S, Mukherjee A, et al. Igel in ambulatory sur-  patients. Middle East J Anesth. 2012;21:583–590.
                 gery: a comparison with LMA-Proseal in paralyzed anaesthetized   29.  Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, et al. Comparison of five
                 patients. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2014;8:80–84.     2nd-generation supraglottic airway devices for airway manage-
                5.  Ekinci O, Abitagaoglu S, Turan G, et al. The comparison of ProSeal   ment performed by novice military operators. Biomed Res Int.
                 and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients   2015;201898:1–8.
                 under controlled ventilation. Saudi Med J. 2014;35:432–436.  30.  Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Haslam GM, et al. I-gel insertion by
                6.  Jaoua  H,  Djaziri  L,  Bousselmi  J,  et  al.  The  I-gel.  Tunis  Med.   novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:991–995.
                 2014;92:239–244.                                31.  Thiruvenkatarajan V, Van Wijk RM, Rajbhoj A. Cranial nerve
                7.  Duckett J, Fell P, Han K, et al. Introduction of the i-gel supraglot-  injuries with supraglottic airway devices: a systematic review of
                 tic  airway device  for prehospital  airway management  in a UK   published case reports and series. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:344–359.
                 ambulance service. Emerg Med J. 2014;1:505–507.  32.  Endo K, Okabe Y, Maruyama Y, et al. Bilateral vocal cord paraly-
                8.  Ostermayer D, Gausche-Hill M. Supraglottic airways: the history   sis caused by laryngeal mask airway. Am J Otolaryn. 2007;28:
                 and current state of prehospital airway adjuncts. Prehosp Emerg   126–129.
                 Care. 2014;18:106–115.                          33.  Brimacombe J, Clarke G, Keller C. Lingual nerve injury associ-
                9.  Goliash G, Ruetzler A, Fischer H, et al. Evaluation of advanced   ated with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a case report and
                 airway management in absolutely inexperienced hands: a ran-  review of the literature. Br J Anesthaesia. 2005;95:420–423.
                 domized manikin trial. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013;20:310–314.  34.  Bruce IA, Ellis R, Kay NJ. Nerve injury and the laryngeal mask
              10.  Haske D, Schempf B, Gaier G, et al. Performance of the iGel dur-  airway. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;18:899–901.
                 ing pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.  Resuscitation.   35.  Britton T, Blakeman TC, Eggert J, et al. Managing endotracheal
                 2013;564:72–77.                                    tube cuff pressure at altitude: a comparison of four methods. J
              11.  Barreira SR, Souza CM, Fabrizia F, et al. Prospective, randomized   Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:S240–244.
                 clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme  used in patients   36.  Castle N, Pilay Y, Spencer N. Insertion of six different supraglot-
                                                  ®
                 undergoing general anesthesia.  Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2013;63:   tic airway devices whilst wearing chemical, biological, radiation,
                 456−460.                                           nuclear-personal protective equipment: a manikin study. Anaes-
              12.  Studer NM, Horn GT, Studer LL, et al. Feasibility of supraglottic   thesia. 2011;66:983–988.
                 airway use by combat lifesavers on the modern battlefield. Mil   37.  Eastridge BJ, Mabry R, Seguin P, et al. Pre-hospital death on the
                 Med. 2013;178:1202–1207.                           battlefield: implications for the future of combat casualty care. J
              13.  Jeon W, Cho S, Baek S, et al. Comparison of the proseal LMA   Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:S431–S437.
                 and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy.  Kor J   38.  Johnson KR, Genovesi MG, Lassar KH. Esophageal obturator
                 Anesth. 2012. [Epub ahead of print]                airway: use and complications. JACEP. 1976;5:36–39.
              14.  Bein B, Scholz J. Supraglottic airway devices. Best Pract Res Clin   39.  Benger JR, Voss S, Coates D, et al. Randomised comparison of
                 Anaesth. 2005;19:581–593.                          the effectiveness of the laryngeal mask airway supreme, i-gel and
              15.  Mayglothling J, Duane T, Gibbs M, et al.  Emergency tracheal   current practice in the initial airway management of prehospi-
                 intubation immediately following traumatic brain injury: an East-  tal cardiac arrest (REVIVE-Airways): a feasibility study research
                 ern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management   protocol. BMJ Open. 2013;67.
                 guidline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:S333–S340.  40.  Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube
              16.  Theiler L, Gutzmann M, Kleine-Brueggeney M, et al. Igel supra-  or facemask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:1017–1023.
                 glottic airway in clinical practice:  a prospective observational   41.  Adams BD, Cuniowski PA, Muck A, et al.  Registry of emer-
                 multicenter study. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:990–995.  gency airways arriving at combat hospitals. J Trauma. 2008;64:
              17.  Russo S, Cremer S, Galli T, et al. Randomized comparison of the   1548–1554.
                 I-gel, the LMA Supreme, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using   42.  McManus JG, Parsons D, Proulx CA, et al. Combat trauma
                 clinical and fiberoptic assessments in the elective patients. BMC   airway management: Combitube versus the King laryngeal tra-
                 Anesthesiol. 2012;18:1–9.                          cheal device by Army combat medic students. Acad Emerg Med.
              18.  Timmerman A. Supraglottic airways in difficult airway manage-  2005;12:162.
                 ment: successes, failures, use and misuse. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:   43.  Dickey NW. Defense Health Board Memo: Supraglottic Airway
                 45–56.                                             Use in Tactical Evacuation Care. 2012-06. 7700 Arlington Blvd.,
              19.  Steinbruner D, Mazur R, Mahoney PF. Intracranial placement of a   Suite 5101, Falls Church VA, 22042-5101. 17 Sept. 2012.
                 nasopharyngeal airway in a gun shot victim. Emerg Med J. 24:311.  44.  Ruetzler K, Roessler B, Potura L, et al. Performance and skill re-
              20.  Ellis DY, Lambert C, Shirley P. Intracranial placement of nasoph-  tention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway
                 ryngeal airways: is it all that rare? Emerg Med J. 2006;23:661–663.  devices – a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2011;82:593–597.
              21.  Martin JE, Mehta R, Aarabi B, et al. Intracranial insertion of a   45.  Butler FK, Hagmann J, Butler EG. Tactical Combat Casualty
                 nasopharyngeal airway in a patient with craniofacial trauma. Mil   Care in Special Operations. Mil Med. 1996;161(suppl):3–16.
                 Med. 2004;169:496–497.                          46.  Bledsoe B, Gandy W. The disappearing endotracheal tube: his-
              22.  Schade K, Borzotta A, Michaels A. Intracranial malposition of   toric skill threatened by lack of practice and new devices. J Emerg
                 nasopharyngeal airway. J Trauma. 2000;49:967–968.  Med Serv. 2009;34:88–99.
              23.  Muzzi DA, Losasso TJ, Cucchiara RF. Complication from a na-  47.  Wang H, Mann N, Mears G, et al. Out-of-hospital airway man-
                 sopharyngeal airway in a patient with a basilar skull fracture.   agement in the United States. Resuscitation. 2011. [Epub ahead
                 Anesthesiology. 1991;74:366–368.                   of print]
              24.  Kim MH, Lee JH, Choi YS, et al. Comparison of the laryngeal   48.  Denver  Metro  Airway  Study  Group.  A  prospective  multicenter
                 mask airway supreme and the i-gel in paralysed elderly patients.   evaluation of prehospital airway management performance in a
                 A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesth. 2017;34:1–7.  large metropolitan region. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:304–310.

                                                                       Extraglottic Airways in Tactical Combat Casualty Care  |  27
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34