Page 29 - JSOM Winter 2017
P. 29
References 25. Gupta B, Gupta S, Hilam B, et al. Comparison of three supra-
1. Shavit I, Aviram E, Hoffmann Y, et al. Laryngeal mask airway as glottic airway devices for airway rescue in the prone position: a
a rescue device for failed endotracheal intubation during scene- manikin-based study. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2015;8:188–192.
to-hospital air transport of combat casualties. Eur J Emerg Med. 26. Ohchi F, Komasawa N, Imagawa K, et al. Evaluation of the effi-
2017. [Epub ahead of print] cacy of six supraglottic devices for airway management in devices
2. Gill RK, Tarat A, Pathak D, et al. Comparative study of two la- airway management in dark conditions: a crossover randomized
ryngeal mask airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Su- simulation trial. J Anesth. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
preme Laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized paralyzed adults 27. Reza Hashemian SM, Nouraei N, Razavi SS, et al. Comparison
undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Essay Res. 2017;11:23–27. of i–gel and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed
™
3. van Tulder R, Schriefl C, Roth D, et al. Laryngeal tube practice in patients. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014;4:288–292.
a metropolitan ambulance service: a five-year retrospective obser- 28. Atef HM, Helmy AM, El-Taher EM, et al. Comparative study
vational study (2009-2013). Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016. [Epub between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical
ahead of print] laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated
4. Das A, Majumdar S, Mukherjee A, et al. Igel in ambulatory sur- patients. Middle East J Anesth. 2012;21:583–590.
gery: a comparison with LMA-Proseal in paralyzed anaesthetized 29. Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, et al. Comparison of five
patients. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2014;8:80–84. 2nd-generation supraglottic airway devices for airway manage-
5. Ekinci O, Abitagaoglu S, Turan G, et al. The comparison of ProSeal ment performed by novice military operators. Biomed Res Int.
and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients 2015;201898:1–8.
under controlled ventilation. Saudi Med J. 2014;35:432–436. 30. Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Haslam GM, et al. I-gel insertion by
6. Jaoua H, Djaziri L, Bousselmi J, et al. The I-gel. Tunis Med. novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:991–995.
2014;92:239–244. 31. Thiruvenkatarajan V, Van Wijk RM, Rajbhoj A. Cranial nerve
7. Duckett J, Fell P, Han K, et al. Introduction of the i-gel supraglot- injuries with supraglottic airway devices: a systematic review of
tic airway device for prehospital airway management in a UK published case reports and series. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:344–359.
ambulance service. Emerg Med J. 2014;1:505–507. 32. Endo K, Okabe Y, Maruyama Y, et al. Bilateral vocal cord paraly-
8. Ostermayer D, Gausche-Hill M. Supraglottic airways: the history sis caused by laryngeal mask airway. Am J Otolaryn. 2007;28:
and current state of prehospital airway adjuncts. Prehosp Emerg 126–129.
Care. 2014;18:106–115. 33. Brimacombe J, Clarke G, Keller C. Lingual nerve injury associ-
9. Goliash G, Ruetzler A, Fischer H, et al. Evaluation of advanced ated with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a case report and
airway management in absolutely inexperienced hands: a ran- review of the literature. Br J Anesthaesia. 2005;95:420–423.
domized manikin trial. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013;20:310–314. 34. Bruce IA, Ellis R, Kay NJ. Nerve injury and the laryngeal mask
10. Haske D, Schempf B, Gaier G, et al. Performance of the iGel dur- airway. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;18:899–901.
ing pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 35. Britton T, Blakeman TC, Eggert J, et al. Managing endotracheal
2013;564:72–77. tube cuff pressure at altitude: a comparison of four methods. J
11. Barreira SR, Souza CM, Fabrizia F, et al. Prospective, randomized Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:S240–244.
clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme used in patients 36. Castle N, Pilay Y, Spencer N. Insertion of six different supraglot-
®
undergoing general anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2013;63: tic airway devices whilst wearing chemical, biological, radiation,
456−460. nuclear-personal protective equipment: a manikin study. Anaes-
12. Studer NM, Horn GT, Studer LL, et al. Feasibility of supraglottic thesia. 2011;66:983–988.
airway use by combat lifesavers on the modern battlefield. Mil 37. Eastridge BJ, Mabry R, Seguin P, et al. Pre-hospital death on the
Med. 2013;178:1202–1207. battlefield: implications for the future of combat casualty care. J
13. Jeon W, Cho S, Baek S, et al. Comparison of the proseal LMA Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:S431–S437.
and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy. Kor J 38. Johnson KR, Genovesi MG, Lassar KH. Esophageal obturator
Anesth. 2012. [Epub ahead of print] airway: use and complications. JACEP. 1976;5:36–39.
14. Bein B, Scholz J. Supraglottic airway devices. Best Pract Res Clin 39. Benger JR, Voss S, Coates D, et al. Randomised comparison of
Anaesth. 2005;19:581–593. the effectiveness of the laryngeal mask airway supreme, i-gel and
15. Mayglothling J, Duane T, Gibbs M, et al. Emergency tracheal current practice in the initial airway management of prehospi-
intubation immediately following traumatic brain injury: an East- tal cardiac arrest (REVIVE-Airways): a feasibility study research
ern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management protocol. BMJ Open. 2013;67.
guidline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:S333–S340. 40. Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube
16. Theiler L, Gutzmann M, Kleine-Brueggeney M, et al. Igel supra- or facemask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:1017–1023.
glottic airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational 41. Adams BD, Cuniowski PA, Muck A, et al. Registry of emer-
multicenter study. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:990–995. gency airways arriving at combat hospitals. J Trauma. 2008;64:
17. Russo S, Cremer S, Galli T, et al. Randomized comparison of the 1548–1554.
I-gel, the LMA Supreme, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using 42. McManus JG, Parsons D, Proulx CA, et al. Combat trauma
clinical and fiberoptic assessments in the elective patients. BMC airway management: Combitube versus the King laryngeal tra-
Anesthesiol. 2012;18:1–9. cheal device by Army combat medic students. Acad Emerg Med.
18. Timmerman A. Supraglottic airways in difficult airway manage- 2005;12:162.
ment: successes, failures, use and misuse. Anaesthesia. 2011;66: 43. Dickey NW. Defense Health Board Memo: Supraglottic Airway
45–56. Use in Tactical Evacuation Care. 2012-06. 7700 Arlington Blvd.,
19. Steinbruner D, Mazur R, Mahoney PF. Intracranial placement of a Suite 5101, Falls Church VA, 22042-5101. 17 Sept. 2012.
nasopharyngeal airway in a gun shot victim. Emerg Med J. 24:311. 44. Ruetzler K, Roessler B, Potura L, et al. Performance and skill re-
20. Ellis DY, Lambert C, Shirley P. Intracranial placement of nasoph- tention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway
ryngeal airways: is it all that rare? Emerg Med J. 2006;23:661–663. devices – a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2011;82:593–597.
21. Martin JE, Mehta R, Aarabi B, et al. Intracranial insertion of a 45. Butler FK, Hagmann J, Butler EG. Tactical Combat Casualty
nasopharyngeal airway in a patient with craniofacial trauma. Mil Care in Special Operations. Mil Med. 1996;161(suppl):3–16.
Med. 2004;169:496–497. 46. Bledsoe B, Gandy W. The disappearing endotracheal tube: his-
22. Schade K, Borzotta A, Michaels A. Intracranial malposition of toric skill threatened by lack of practice and new devices. J Emerg
nasopharyngeal airway. J Trauma. 2000;49:967–968. Med Serv. 2009;34:88–99.
23. Muzzi DA, Losasso TJ, Cucchiara RF. Complication from a na- 47. Wang H, Mann N, Mears G, et al. Out-of-hospital airway man-
sopharyngeal airway in a patient with a basilar skull fracture. agement in the United States. Resuscitation. 2011. [Epub ahead
Anesthesiology. 1991;74:366–368. of print]
24. Kim MH, Lee JH, Choi YS, et al. Comparison of the laryngeal 48. Denver Metro Airway Study Group. A prospective multicenter
mask airway supreme and the i-gel in paralysed elderly patients. evaluation of prehospital airway management performance in a
A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesth. 2017;34:1–7. large metropolitan region. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:304–310.
Extraglottic Airways in Tactical Combat Casualty Care | 27