Page 52 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2016
P. 52

Testing of Junctional Tourniquets by Medics of the
           Israeli Defense Force in Control of Simulated Groin Hemorrhage



                               Jacob Chen, MD, MHA, MSc*; Avi Benov, MD, MHA*;
                 Roy Nadler, MD; Geva Landau, MD; Alex Sorkin, MD; James K. Aden 3rd, PhD;
                                  John F. Kragh Jr, MD; Elon Glassberg, MD, MHA





          ABSTRACT

          Background: Junctional hemorrhage is a common cause   hemorrhage (i.e., bleeding from wounds at the junction
          of battlefield death but little is known about testing of   of the trunk and its appendages, including the groin, the
          junctional tourniquet models by medics. The purpose of   buttocks, the axilla, the shoulder girdle, or the neck).
                                                                                                           1–3
          the testing described herein is to assess military experience   In two studies  of US battlefield casualties who died and
                                                                         4,5
          in junctional tourniquet use in simulated prehospital care.   underwent autopsy (either killed in action out of hospi-
          Methods: Fourteen medics were to use the following four   tal or died of wounds after hospital admission), about
          junctional tourniquets: Combat Ready Clamp (CRoC),   20% of preventable deaths were attributed to junctional
          Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT), Junc-  hemorrhage. Such deaths before or after reaching a sur-
          tional Emergency Treatment Tool (JETT), and SAM Junc-  gical facility might be preventable by better hemorrhage
          tional Tourniquet (SJT). The five assessment categories   control interventions.  As late as 2009, the Committee
                                                                                2,3
          were safety, effectiveness, time to effectiveness, and two   on Tactical Combat Casualty Care recommended only
          categories of user preference: (1) by all models assessed,   manual compression with a hemostatic dressing to man-
          and (2) by only the model most preferred. Users ranked   age out-of-hospital junctional hemorrhage, because no
          preference by answering, “If you had to go to war today   other treatment options had been shown superior.  In
                                                                                                          5
          and you could only choose one, which tourniquet would   2011, Blackbourne et al.  described junctional hemor-
                                                                                   6
          you choose to bring?” Results: All tourniquet uses were   rhage as being compressible but unsuitable for tourni-
          safe. By the time the first five testers were done, all three   quet application because a limb tourniquet cannot fit
          AAJT models had been broken. CRoC and AAJT had the   body areas that are junctional.
          highest percentage effectiveness as their difference was not
          statistically significant. SJT and JETT had fastest mean   The possible benefits of a junctional tourniquet were
          times to effectiveness as their difference was not signifi-  assessed by Kragh et al.  in US military war casualties
                                                                                  1
          cant. For preference, using each user’s ranking of all mod-  who arrived alive to a hospital from 2001 to 2010. They
          els assessed, SJT and AAJT were most preferred as their   considered casualties with potentially survivable injuries
          difference was not significant. For each user’s most pre-  (23%) and the percentage of those who had junctional
          ferred model, SJT, AAJT, and JETT were most preferred   wounds and died (20%); none of these casualties with
          as their difference was not significant. Conclusion: In the   junctional wounds was treated with a junctional tour-
          five assessment categories, multiple tourniquet models   niquet. They calculated that if all 20% with junctional
          performed similarly well; SJT and AAJT performed best   wounds were potentially savable with a junctional tour-
          in four categories, JETT was best in three, and CRoC was   niquet, then by this one estimate, the yield of optimal
          best in two. Differences between the top-ranked models in   use of such a device could have been three lives saved
          each category were not statistically significant.  per month.  Kragh et al. also detected a large increase
                                                                       1
                                                             in the annual percentage of junctional wounding among
          Keywords: tourniquets; hemorrhage; resuscitation; groin;   the casualties who arrived alive to a hospital; the find-
          inguinal; medical device; injuries; and wounds     ing indicated the need for junctional hemorrhage con-
                                                             trol rose 14-fold. 1

                                                             To address the need for junctional hemorrhage control,
          Introduction
                                                             novel and effective junctional tourniquets have been de-
          A common cause of death on the battlefield among ca-  veloped recently. As of October 2014, four models of
          sualties with potentially survivable injuries is junctional   junctional tourniquet have been developed  commercially

          *These authors contributed equally.



                                                          36
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57