Page 105 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2016
P. 105

An Ongoing Series



                                         Injuries and Footwear (Part 2)

                                               Minimalist Running Shoes



                       Joseph J. Knapik, ScD; Robin Orr, PhD; Rodney Pope, PhD; Tyson Grier, MS








              ABSTRACT
              This article defines minimalist running shoes and ex-  Introduction
              amines physiological, biomechanical, and injury rate   Within the past 12 years, minimalist running shoes have
              differences when running in conventional versus min-  gained popularity as an alternative to modern, high-
              imalist running shoes. A minimalist shoe is one that   technology running footwear. Advocates argue that run-
              provides “minimal interference with the natural move-  ning in minimalist shoes is closer to barefoot running, for
              ment of the foot, because of its high flexibility, low heel   which humans are naturally adapted through years of
              to toe drop, weight and stack height, and the absence   evolution, while opponents argue that the foot is better
              of motion control and stability devices.” Most stud-  protected by the stability, support, and superior cushion-
              ies indicate that running in minimalist shoes results   ing provided by modern running shoes.  In this article, we
                                                                                                 1
              in a lower physiological energy cost than running in   first define the minimalist shoe, then review physiological
 Hosted by NAEMT’s PHTLS Committee and EMS World Expo  conventional shoes, likely because of the lower weight   and biomechanical differences between running in mini-
              of the minimalist shoe. Most individuals running  in   malist and conventional footwear and examine studies
              conventional shoes impact the ground heel first (rear-  that have compared injury rates based on biomechanical
              foot strike pattern), whereas most people running in   differences and running in the two types of footwear.
 OCTOBER 4, 2016   Presenting the latest research and information   minimalist shoes tend to strike with the front of the
              foot (forefoot strike pattern). The rate at which force
 NEW ORLEANS, LA   on prehospital trauma care from internationally   is developed on ground impact (i.e., the loading rate)   It is important to note that we are only considering
                                                                 studies that have looked at conventional and minimal-
 recognized experts around the globe, the 5th annual
 ERNEST N. MORIAL   World Trauma Symposium will expand your medical   is generally higher when running in conventional ver-  ist footwear. Minimalist footwear was developed by
              sus minimalist shoes. Findings from studies that have
 CONVENTION CENTER  knowledge and improve your clinical care, ultimately   looked at associations between injuries and foot strike   running shoe companies in response to the “barefoot
                                                                 movement,” the movement away from shoes altogether
 improving your patients’ outcomes. A 1-day   patterns or injuries and loading rates are conflicting,   in favor of running barefoot.  In the US military, bare-
                                                                                          2
 educational event that will change the way    so it is not clear if these factors influence injury rates;   foot running is not permitted in regular unit training
              more research is needed. Better-designed prospective
 you practice.  studies indicate that bone stress injuries and the overall   and some form of running footwear is required. Thus,
              injury incidence are higher in minimalist shoes during   this review only includes studies that compare minimal-
 All attendees will receive 8 hours of CECBEMS-  the early weeks (10–12 weeks) of transition to this type   ist and conventional footwear. This is the second part
                                                                 of our review of footwear and injuries. Part 1 covered
 accredited CE, CME or nursing CE.     of footwear. Longer-term studies are needed to define   the history of athletic footwear, how selecting footwear
              injury rates once runners are fully transitioned to mini-  based on arch height affects injury rates, and provided
              malist shoes. At least one longer-term minimalist-shoe   an historical comparison of injury incidence when run-
 The premier education event for   investigation is ongoing and, hopefully, will be pub-
 Early Bird Discount!  lished soon.                              ning in shoes versus boots.
 ALL providers of out-of-hospital   WorldTraumaSymposium.com   Register by 9/2 and   Keywords: injuries, foot; footwear; shoes, minimalist; shoes,   What Is a “Minimalist Running Shoe”?
 Save $50!    conventional; shoes, running
 trauma care.                                                    A definition of a “minimalist shoe” was developed by
                                                                 a group of 43 people who were primarily running shoe


 #WorldTrauma16   Learn about PHTLS at naemt.org              89
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110